面向通勤路径上下游节点辨识及通行能力匹配研究
Study on Capacity Matching of Upstream and Downstream Node Identification for Commuter Paths
DOI: 10.12677/orf.2025.152089, PDF,    国家科技经费支持
作者: 姚 佼*, 王 银:上海理工大学管理学院,上海;上海理工大学智慧城市交通研究院,上海
关键词: 交通工程通勤路径上下游节点匹配辨识模型通行能力匹配率Traffic Engineering Commuter Paths Upstream and Downstream Nodes Matching Identification Model Capacity Matching Rate
摘要: 针对城市道路高峰小时通勤路径中车辆排队累积并溢出至上游节点,导致上下游节点通行能力折损的问题,研究在分析四类典型通勤路径场景的基础上,综合考虑上下游间距等静态因素,以及流量流向与信号参数等动态因素,提出了上下游流量流向匹配辨识模型;进一步通过调节信号配时、相位相序及可变车道等策略,建立了上下游节点通行能力匹配模型。案例结果表明,上游直行、下游直行或左转的路径一、二匹配度均在0.79以上,效果显著;四类路径实施匹配策略后,整体通行能力匹配率提升了5.8%,其中上游直行下游左转的路径二、上游左转下游直行的路径三,通行能力匹配率提升均超过20%。因此,本研究提出的路径通行能力匹配模型具有较强的工程应用价值。
Abstract: The issue of vehicle queues accumulating and spilling over to upstream nodes during peak commuting hours on urban roads leads to reduced capacity at both upstream and downstream nodes. The study analyzed four typical commuter path scenarios and proposed a flow-direction matching identification model. This model considers both static factors, such as upstream-downstream spacing, and dynamic factors, like flow direction and signal parameters. Further, by adjusting signal timing, phase sequence, and variable lanes, a capacity matching model for upstream and downstream nodes was developed. Case results show that the matching degree for paths with upstream straight and downstream straight or left turns (Path 1 and 2) is above 0.79, indicating significant improvement. After implementing the matching strategy, the overall capacity matching rate increased by 5.8%. In particular, Path 2 (upstream straight, downstream left turn) and Path 3 (upstream left turn, downstream straight) saw capacity matching improvements exceeding 20%. Therefore, the proposed path capacity matching model has strong engineering application value.
文章引用:姚佼, 王银. 面向通勤路径上下游节点辨识及通行能力匹配研究[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2025, 15(2): 350-362. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2025.152089

参考文献

[1] 聂磊, 马万经. 基于车道等饱和度的交叉口车道功能优化模型[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(1): 42-50.
[2] Wu, A., Qi, L. and Yang, X. (2013) Mechanism Analysis and Optimization of Signalized Intersection Coordinated Control under Oversaturated Status. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 96, 1433-1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Wu, W., Ma, W. and Long, K. (2015) Capacity Matching Based Model for Protected Left Turn Phases Design of Adjacent Signalized Intersections along Arterial Roads. PROMETTraffic & Transportation, 27, 13-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 吴伟, 刘洋, 马万经, 等. 考虑上下游通行能力匹配的干线禁左模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(6): 157-163.
[5] Yao, R., Guo, W. and Zhou, H. (2017) Integrative Design of Left-Turn Lane Space and Signal Coordination for Two Adjacent Intersections. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 44, 274-285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 姚荣涵, 彭程, 周红媚. 协调控制交叉口短车道长度和配时参数协同优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(4): 1082-1087.
[7] Zhang, Q., Guo, X.C. and Liang, H. (2014) Correlation Degree Model of Urban Signalized Intersection Group Based on Turning Flows. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 641, 839-847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 齐立群, 云美萍, 杨晓光. 短连线交叉口饱和条件下相位差优化设计研究[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2013, 31(2): 128-133.
[9] 王浩, 彭国雄, 杨晓光. 相位相序安排与交叉口设计之间的关系[J]. 公路交通科技, 2004, 21(2): 92-94.
[10] 刘树青. 城市交通拥堵主动防控与快速疏导控制方法研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2017.
[11] 杨胜德. 基于交叉口群协调路径链的区域交通信号控制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 金华: 浙江师范大学, 2022.
[12] 曲大义, 万孟飞, 王兹林, 等. 基于交通波理论的干线绿波协调控制方法[J]. 公路交通科技, 2016, 33(9): 112-119.
[13] 张保硕. 短车道信号交叉口通行能力及组织优化分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 长安大学, 2020.
[14] 马万经, 陆艳, 安琨, 等. 短车道信号控制交叉口通行能力概率模型[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40(11): 1641-1646.
[15] 姚佼, 赵靖, 王银, 等. 一种信控交叉口不同功能车道通行能力匹配方法和装置[P]. 中国专利, 2024102701442. 2025-02-14.