学术期刊
切换导航
首 页
文 章
期 刊
投 稿
预 印
会 议
书 籍
新 闻
合 作
我 们
按学科分类
Journals by Subject
按期刊分类
Journals by Title
核心OA期刊
Core OA Journal
数学与物理
Math & Physics
化学与材料
Chemistry & Materials
生命科学
Life Sciences
医药卫生
Medicine & Health
信息通讯
Information & Communication
工程技术
Engineering & Technology
地球与环境
Earth & Environment
经济与管理
Economics & Management
人文社科
Humanities & Social Sciences
合作期刊
Cooperation Journals
首页
地球与环境
工程技术
石油天然气学报
Vol. 47 No. 2 (June 2025)
期刊菜单
最新文章
历史文章
检索
领域
编委
投稿须知
文章处理费
最新文章
历史文章
检索
领域
编委
投稿须知
文章处理费
建设工程领域新型争议解决方式——DAB机制的国际经验与中国探索
New Dispute Resolution Method in the Construction Engineering Field—International Experiences and Chinese Explorations of the DAB Mechanism
DOI:
10.12677/jogt.2025.472026
,
PDF
,
被引量
作者:
张秀静
:中国石油管道局工程有限公司国际分公司,河北 廊坊
关键词:
建设工程争议
;
争议裁决委员会(DAB)
;
FIDIC合同
;
多元化纠纷解决
;
Construction Project Disputes
;
Dispute Adjudication Board (DAB)
;
FIDIC Contract
;
Diversified Dispute Resolution
摘要:
随着全球经济合作和“一带一路”项目的推进,国际建设工程的规模和复杂程度越来越高。传统的诉讼、仲裁等争议解决方式,存在耗时长、费用高、容易激化矛盾等问题,难以满足现代工程需要。DAB机制凭借专业性强、流程灵活等特点,已在多个跨国工程中取得良好效果。但目前我国对DAB机制的运用仍处于起步阶段,存在法律定位不清、行业认知不足等问题。本文结合国际工程FIDIC 2017版合同条款和中国最高人民法院多元化纠纷解决政策,分析DAB机制的实际应用价值。
Abstract:
With the advancement of global economic cooperation and the “Belt and Road Initiative” projects, the scale and complexity of international construction projects are increasing. Traditional dispute resolution methods such as litigation and arbitration have problems such as long-time consumption, high costs, and the tendency to intensify conflicts, making it difficult to meet the needs of modern engineering projects. The Dispute Adjudication Board (DAB) mechanism, with its strong professionalism and flexible procedures, has achieved good results in many multinational engineering projects. However, the application of the DAB mechanism in China is still in its infancy, with issues such as unclear legal positioning and insufficient industry awareness. This paper analyzes the practical application value of the DAB mechanism by combining the FIDIC contract (2017 Edition) for international engineering projects and the diversified dispute resolution policies of the Supreme People’s Court of China.
文章引用:
张秀静. 建设工程领域新型争议解决方式——DAB机制的国际经验与中国探索[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2025, 47(2): 223-227.
https://doi.org/10.12677/jogt.2025.472026
参考文献
[1]
FIDIC (2017) Conditions of Contract for Construction. FIDIC Press.
[2]
DRBF微信公众号. Dispute Resolution Board Foundation [EB/OL].
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzUxNDQ3MzUyMw==&mid=2247483659&idx=1&sn=60d615163968c337cede53729a55d7b6&chksm=f8c950ba6163a2f9617ff3ff92340e1fa2883219c0d38daaf90e3c03b3ccf0d917ba9c5fec4e#rd
, 2017-11-22.
[3]
最高人民法院. 关于人民法院进一步深化多元化纠纷解决机制改革的意见(法发〔2016〕14号) [EB/OL].
https://www.court.gov.cn/fabu/xiangqing/22742.html
, 2025-01-10.
[4]
International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Revised Edition).
https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/IAA1994
投稿
友情链接
科研出版社
开放图书馆