浅析刑事案件庭审实质化规程及模式

Discussion on the Substantive Rules and Modes of Criminal Case Trial

摘要: 在依法治国成为治国重器大背景下，为遏制冤假错案，坚持惩罚犯罪与保障人权高度统一，亟待对旧有刑事司法制度进行革新，改变原有部分不合时宜、简单粗暴刑事办案方式，而改革的矛头和关键直指庭审环节。作为以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革的突破口，刑事庭审实质化理应成为必然要求和应有之义。因此，合理理清庭审实质化与以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革关系，正确考量庭审实质化与办案效率互相博弈，科学规划庭审实质化基本要求，超前谋划庭审实质化发展趋势等系列问题应成为理论研究的重点及实践检验的指标。

Abstract: Under the overarching context of the rule of law serving as a cornerstone of governance, there is an urgent need to reform outdated criminal justice systems to curb wrongful convictions and uphold the seamless integration of punishing crimes with safeguarding human rights. This requires transforming certain obsolete and overly simplistic criminal case-handling practices. The focus and pivotal point of this reform lie in court trial procedures. As the breakthrough point for the trial-centered reform of the criminal procedure system, the substantiveization of criminal court trials must become an inevitable demand and intrinsic requirement. Consequently, critical issues such as clarifying the relationship between substantive trials and trial-centered judicial reforms, rationally balancing the interplay between trial substantiation and judicial efficiency, scientifically defining the fundamental requirements for trial substantiation, and proactively planning for its developmental trajectory should be prioritized as focal points for theoretical research and practical evaluation.