“各依风俗”立法原则下的元代丁忧制度
The Dingyou System of the Yuan Dynasty from the Perspective of the Legislative Principle of “Everything in Accordance with the Original Custom”
摘要: “以孝治天下”是我国古代封建王朝千年来历代沿用的基本国策,作为儒家“孝文化”重要一环的丁忧制度,一经确立就被历代封建王朝所沿袭。元廷不仅在法律制度的构建和实践过程中注重继承中原法律制度,同时也与时俱进,作出适当调整。本文主要从丁忧制度在元代的建立、相关规定及“各依风俗”界限淡化的深层逻辑这两个方面来探讨丁忧制度在元代的发展历程以及在促进各民族交流交往过程中的桥梁作用。
Abstract: The principle of “governing the world with filial piety” has been a basic national policy adopted by ancient feudal dynasties in China for thousands of years. As an important part of Confucian “filial piety culture”, the Dingyou system has been followed by feudal dynasties since its establishment. The Yuan court not only focused on inheriting the legal system of the Central Plains in the construction and practice of the legal system, but also kept pace with the times and made appropriate adjustments. This article mainly explores the development process of the Dingyou system in the Yuan Dynasty and its role as a bridge in promoting exchanges and communication among various ethnic groups from two aspects: the establishment of the Dingyou system in the Yuan Dynasty, relevant regulations, and the deep logic of the weakening of the boundary of “everything in accordance with the original custom”.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
俞可平. 孝忠一体与家国同构——从丁忧看传统中国的政治形态[J]. 天津社会科学, 2021(5): 107-117.
|
|
[2]
|
丁凌华. 中国丧服制度史[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2000.
|
|
[3]
|
陈高华, 等. 中国风俗通史·元代卷[M]. 上海: 上海文艺出版社, 2001.
|
|
[4]
|
唐犀. 元代丁忧制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南政法大学, 2011.
|
|
[5]
|
章太长. 试论元代的丁忧制度[J]. 中华文化论坛, 2011(2): 139-142.
|
|
[6]
|
刘香玉. 浅谈元代官吏休假制[J]. 贵州文史丛刊, 2014(2): 18-22.
|
|
[7]
|
(元)佚名. 通制条格[M]. 方龄贵, 校注. 北京: 中华书局, 2001.
|
|
[8]
|
陈高华, 等, 点校. 元典章[M]. 天津: 天津古籍出版社, 2011.
|
|
[9]
|
(明)宋濂, 等, 撰. 元史[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1976.
|
|
[10]
|
(元)佚名. 至正条格[M]. 李玠奭, 等, 校注. 首尔: 韩国学中央研究院, 2007.
|
|
[11]
|
陈得芝, 校. 元代奏议辑录∙许有壬[M]. 杭州: 浙江古籍出版社, 1988.
|
|
[12]
|
[波斯]拉施特. 史集[M]. 余大钧, 等, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1997.
|
|
[13]
|
(元)黄溍. 金华黄先生集[M]. 上海: 商务印书馆, 1949.
|
|
[14]
|
(元)陆文圭. 墙东类稿[M]. 台北: 新文丰出版公司, 1985.
|