电信网络诈骗共同犯罪司法认定疑难研究

Study on Difficulties in Judicial Determination of Complicity in Telecommunication Network Fraud

摘要: 近年来，电信网络诈骗犯罪的犯罪率逐渐上升，犯罪主体结构更为复杂，犯罪手段和模式也更加多样，为人民群众的生命财产安全造成了极大损害，也为司法机关的案件审理工作带来了巨大的难题。电信网络诈骗罪往往以共同犯罪的形式呈现，国家在打击电信网络诈骗共同犯罪时存在司法认定上的问题。将通过案例分析法和文献分析法，总结电信网络诈骗共同犯罪的基本界定和行为类型。并在此基础上，文章分析了电信网络诈骗共同犯罪司法认定的疑难，如主观“明知”标准难以认定、共同犯罪数额认定的困境以及主从犯认定的疑难。最后，本文提出了相应的完善建议，如多视角综合适用“明知”认定电信网络诈骗共犯、以差异化的标准认定犯罪数额以及综合所处的具体环节和整体作用、分角色认定主从犯。

Abstract: In recent years, telecommunication network fraud has shown a trend of high frequency, organization, and cross-regional development, posing severe challenges to judicial determination. Such crimes often manifest as complicity with strict division of labor and complex hierarchies, yet significant judicial divergences exist regarding the determination of subjective “knowledge,” the division of criminal amounts, and the distinction between principal and accessory offenders. Based on judicial practice, combined with the development of criminal law theory and analysis of typical cases, this paper systematically examines the typological characteristics and determination dilemmas of complicity in telecommunication network fraud. It explores the introduction of theories such as “neutral helping behavior” and “unilateral complicity” to improve the determination mechanism for aiding offenses, advocates for the establishment of a differentiated and objective system for determining criminal amounts, and promotes a method for distinguishing between principal and accessory offenders that “combines the role in specific links with the overall contribution.” The aim is to provide more operable and uniform guidance for judicial practice.