承转之间:论民俗的稳定性特征与现代性流变
Between Transfer and Inheritance: On the Stability of Folk Custom and the Evolution of Modernity
摘要: 在社会流动性持续加快、数字技术全面渗透的当代语境下,民俗的生成机制与存在形态发生了深刻变革。民俗群体已从传统的地域固定型群体,转向临时聚合型、圈层化与符号化联结的多元形态。本文以《民俗学概论》的理论框架为基础,聚焦民俗传承与适应过程中相互交织的“稳定性”与“流变性”核心议题,通过双重维度的系统分析展开研究。首先,阐释民俗跨越时空维系文化认同的稳定性机制,深入剖析集体性、程式化、传承性等关键特征的内在逻辑;其次,立足现代性冲击的现实背景,从实践形式、社会功能与文化意义三个维度,解析民俗的现代流变轨迹,并结合数字化传播、消费社会崛起、生活节奏加速等时代特征,辅以具体案例进行深度解构。研究表明,民俗的生命力并非源于对传统的僵化固守,而是在于“传统传承”与“时代创新”的动态平衡,这种辩证关系构成了民俗持续存续与焕发活力的核心动力。
Abstract: In the contemporary context of accelerating social mobility and pervasive digital technology, the mechanisms and forms of folk culture have undergone profound transformations. Traditional regional communities have evolved into diverse, temporally aggregated groups characterized by hierarchical connections and symbolic associations. Grounded in the theoretical framework of “Introduction to Folklore Studies”, this research focuses on the interwoven dynamics of “stability” and “fluidity” in folk cultural transmission and adaptation, employing a dual-dimensional systematic analysis. First, it elucidates the stability mechanisms that sustain cultural identity across time and space, delving into the intrinsic logic of collective identity, ritualized patterns, and generational continuity. Second, within the context of modernity’s challenges, the study examines the modern trajectory of folk culture through three dimensions: practical manifestations, social functions, and cultural significance. By integrating contemporary features like digital dissemination, the rise of consumer society, and accelerated lifestyles, the research employs concrete case studies for in-depth analysis. The findings reveal that folk culture’s vitality stems not from rigid adherence to tradition, but from the dynamic equilibrium between “traditional inheritance” and “contemporary innovation”. This dialectical relationship forms the core driving force behind the sustained existence and revitalization of folk traditions.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
钟敬文. 民俗学概论[M]. 第二版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2019.
|
|
[2]
|
孙九霞. 民俗主体变迁、民俗形态混杂与民俗学的新路径[J]. 民俗研究, 2025(6): 5-12.
|
|
[3]
|
高丙中. 民俗文化与民俗生活[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 1994.
|
|
[4]
|
王霄冰. 民俗主义论与德国民俗学[J]. 民间文化论坛, 2006(3): 100-105.
|
|
[5]
|
刘晓春. 民俗与消费时代的日常生活[J]. 学术研究, 2011(5): 3-8.
|
|
[6]
|
岳永逸. 都市中国的乡土音声: 民俗、曲艺与心性[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2015.
|
|
[7]
|
霍布斯鲍姆∙兰格. 传统的发明[M]. 修订版. 顾杭, 庞冠群, 译. 北京: 译林出版社, 2020.
|
|
[8]
|
费孝通. 乡土中国∙生育制度[M]. 重印本. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2022.
|
|
[9]
|
陈勤建. 当代中国民俗学[M]. 上海: 上海文艺出版社, 2021.
|
|
[10]
|
萧放. 传统节日与当代社会[J]. 民俗研究, 2022(3): 5-16.
|
|
[11]
|
吕微. 民俗学的“本真性”问题与理论反思[J]. 民族文学研究, 2021(1): 89-98.
|
|
[12]
|
彭兆荣. 非物质文化遗产的本真性困境与突围[J]. 思想战线, 2020(5): 120-127.
|
|
[13]
|
郑土有. 数字时代民俗传承的路径与挑战[J]. 文化遗产, 2023(2): 45-53.
|