个人破产制度中豁免财产的理论建构与路径探索
Theoretical Construction and Path Exploration of Exempt Property in Personal Bankruptcy System
摘要: 豁免财产制度是个人破产立法的核心,关乎债务人生存权、发展权与债权人利益之间的平衡,也涉及社会公共利益的维护。本文立足于法理根基与实务争议,系统梳理豁免财产的历史源流与功能演进,辨析其在范围界定中“必要”与“合理”的尺度、“形式公平”与“实质公平”的冲突、“静态豁免”与“动态资产”的矛盾,并比较美、德、日三种立法模式的优劣。研究提出,我国宜采取“列举 + 概括”混合立法模式,构建涵盖宅地、职业工具、精神财产与数字资产在内的多层次豁免体系,辅以诚信审查、区域调节与阶梯式未来收入处理等配套机制,以期实现债务人再生、债权保障与社会稳定三者之有机统一。
Abstract: The exempt property system is central to personal bankruptcy legislation, balancing the debtor’s right to survival and development with the interests of creditors, while also safeguarding social public interests. Based on jurisprudential foundations and practical controversies, this article systematically reviews the historical evolution and functional development of exempt property, analyzes the tension between “necessity” and “reasonableness” in defining its scope, the conflict between “formal fairness” and “substantive fairness,” and the contradiction between “static exemption” and “dynamic assets.” It further compares the strengths and weaknesses of legislative models from the United States, Germany, and Japan. The study proposes that China should adopt a hybrid legislative model combining “enumeration and generalization,” constructing a multi-level exemption system covering homesteads, professional tools, spiritual property, and digital assets, supplemented by supporting mechanisms such as good-faith review, regional adjustment, and tiered future income processing. This aims to achieve an organic unity of debtor rehabilitation, creditor protection, and social stability.
文章引用:胡峻峰, 宋艳. 个人破产制度中豁免财产的理论建构与路径探索[J]. 法学, 2026, 14(2): 165-175. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2026.142058

参考文献

[1] 胡利玲. 论个人破产中豁免财产范围的确定[J]. 经贸法律评论, 2019(4): 110-123.
[2] 徐阳光, 陈科林. 论个人破产立法中的自由财产制度[J]. 东方论坛, 2020(3): 99-113.
[3] 张阳. 个人破产何以可能: 溯源、证立与展望[J]. 税务与经济, 2019(4): 1-10.
[4] 徐国栋. 《十二表法》研究[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2019.
[5] [德]康德. 道德形而上学原理[M]. 苗力田, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2023.
[6] 段宝玫. 清末《破产律》实施环境之历史考察[J]. 前沿, 2013(24): 144-146.
[7] 郭兴利. 建立个人破产制度: 化解个人债务纠纷的新路径[J]. 山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2010, 55(2): 140-144.
[8] 曹启选. 构建个人破产制度的若干思考——以深圳探索经验为视角[J]. 中国应用法学, 2024(1): 98-108.
[9] 程远州. 创新“执破融合”机制, 全国首宗个人“执转破”案件审结[Z/OL]. 人民日报客户端.
https://www.peopleapp.com/column/30048810283-500006206005, 2025-4-17.
[10] 刘梦醒. 个人破产豁免财产范围的法律相关问题探讨[J]. 法制博览, 2025(20): 36-38.
[11] [美]查尔斯·J·泰伯. 美国破产法新论[M]. 第3版. 韩长印, 何欢, 王之洲, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2017.
[12] 胡利玲. 论个人破产中豁免财产的构成与限制[J]. 东方论坛, 2020(3): 84-98.
[13] [日]山本和彦. 日本倒产处理法入门[M]. 金春, 等, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2016.
[14] 破产审判“小切口”助推营商环境“大优化”——浙江温州法院探索破产审判新机制工作访谈[N/OL]. 人民法院报, 2025-04-09.
https://www.court.gov.cn/zixun/xiangqing/461531.html, 2025-11-10.
[15] 李迪文. 个人债务“执转破”的认定与衔接——以首例个人债务“执转破”案件为例[J]. 法律适用, 2025(7): 107-126.