人为德性与自发秩序:对休谟正义理论的审视
Artificial Virtue and Spontaneous Order: A Re-Examination of Hume’s Theory of Justice
DOI: 10.12677/acpp.2026.153111, PDF,   
作者: 王禹丹:黑龙江大学哲学学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨
关键词: 休谟正义理论人为德性财产权David Hume Theory of Justice Artificial Virtue Property Right
摘要: 本文探讨休谟正义理论中“人为德性”与“自发秩序”的内在关联。休谟以情感主义道德哲学为根基,指出道德判断的核心是基于“普遍观念”的道德感,理性仅起辅助作用,并以此区分自然与人为德性,提出正义不来源于理性或自然德性,而是人类在资源适度稀缺与人性有限慷慨的条件下,为维系社会存续与共同利益构建的协议。休谟的贡献在于突破了自然法先验框架地解释了正义的起源,其以社会功利为尺度的后果导向也对当代分配正义理论产生启示意义,但也具有“旁观者视角”的局限性和以财产权为中心的狭隘性的内在困境。
Abstract: This paper explores the intrinsic connection between “artificial virtue” and “spontaneous order” in Hume’s theory of justice. Based on his sentimentalist moral philosophy, Hume points out that the core of moral judgment is the moral sense based on the “general point of view”, where reason only plays an auxiliary role. By distinguishing between natural and artificial virtues, he proposes that justice does not originate from reason or natural virtues, but is an agreement constructed by humans to maintain social survival and common interests under the conditions of moderate scarcity of resources and limited generosity of human nature. Hume’s contribution lies in breaking through the transcendental framework of natural law to explain the origin of justice, and his consequence-oriented approach with social utility as the criterion also has enlightening significance for contemporary distributive justice theory. However, it also has inherent dilemmas, including the limitation of the “spectator’s perspective” and the narrowness centered on property rights.
文章引用:王禹丹. 人为德性与自发秩序:对休谟正义理论的审视[J]. 哲学进展, 2026, 15(3): 91-97. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2026.153111

参考文献

[1] (英)大卫·休谟. 人性论[M]. 关文运, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2016.
[2] 赵雨淘. 人为德性与文明社会的秩序构建——对休谟正义理论的辩护性阐释[J]. 道德与文明, 2021(4): 110-121.
[3] (英)大卫·休谟. 道德原则研究[M]. 曾晓平, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2017.
[4] 龚群. 人为规范与德性——再论休谟的正义论[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 53(4): 14-23+179.
[5] 伍志燕. 论休谟的财产权理论[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2008(1): 53-57.
[6] 孙海霞. 休谟“旁观者”的同情理论探微[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 17(3): 58-62.
[7] 李薇. 论休谟道德哲学中的“旁观者” [J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2025, 39(2): 143-152.
[8] 黄济鳌. 正义与人性——休谟与罗尔斯的正义论的一种比较[J]. 现代哲学, 2023(3): 108-115.