矿企ISO 14001认证的多元驱动路径——基于fsQCA与中介效应的管理决策系统组态研究
Multi-Driving Paths for ISO 14001 Certification in Mining Enterprises—Research on the Configuration of Management Decision System Based on fsQCA and Mediating Effect
DOI: 10.12677/mse.2026.152031, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 蔡梦妍:江西理工大学经济管理学院,江西 赣州
关键词: ISO 14001认证ESG表现模糊集定性比较分析管理决策系统ISO 14001 Certification ESG Performance fsQCA Management Decision System
摘要: 企业如何通过内外部要素协同配置实现ISO 14001认证是环境管理与工程决策优化的关键议题。现有研究多关注外部规制或单一因素净效应,难揭示多重前因条件复杂因果机制。本研究基于吉登斯结构化理论,构建“规则–资源–能动性”的系统工程分析框架,以中国A股矿业上市公司为样本,采用模糊集定性比较分析与中介分析结合的方法,探寻驱动ISO 14001认证的多元组态路径,检验ESG表现的中介角色。研究发现:1) 存在八条引致认证的等效前因组态,可归纳为六类驱动模式,揭示认证决策在多路径协同下的系统实现逻辑;2) ESG表现在多数组态路径中起部分中介作用,表明前因条件协同效应不仅直接推动认证,还通过提升企业综合可持续发展水平间接促成管理决策优化。本研究为理解企业环境管理实践提供系统组态视角,揭示认证多要素联动、多路径通达的深层逻辑,为矿业企业运营决策和政策制定者提供启示。
Abstract: How enterprises can achieve ISO 14001 certification through coordinated internal and external element configuration is a key environmental management and engineering decision - optimization issue. Existing studies focus on external regulations or single-factor net effects and can’t reveal complex multi-antecedent causal mechanisms. This study, based on Giddens’ structural theory, constructs a “rules - resources - agency” system engineering analysis framework. Using Chinese A-share mining listed companies as samples, it combines fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis and mediation analysis to explore ISO 14001 certification driving paths and test ESG performance’s mediating role. Findings: 1) Eight equivalent antecedent configurations lead to certification, classifiable into six driving modes, showing multi-path coordinated certification decision logic; 2) ESG performance partially mediates most paths, meaning antecedent condition synergy directly promotes certification and indirectly optimizes management decisions by enhancing enterprise sustainable development. This study offers a systematic view for understanding enterprise environmental management, reveals multi-factor and multi-path certification logic, and provides insights for mining enterprises and policy makers.
文章引用:蔡梦妍. 矿企ISO 14001认证的多元驱动路径——基于fsQCA与中介效应的管理决策系统组态研究[J]. 管理科学与工程, 2026, 15(2): 305-320. https://doi.org/10.12677/mse.2026.152031

参考文献

[1] Pan, F., Xu, Y. and Wang, L. (2025) How to Achieve High-Quality Participation in Voluntary Environmental Regulation: Influencing Factors and Decision Mechanism. PLOS One, 20, e0332806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 谢波, 程栋鹏. 市场激励型环境规制能否促进企业ESG实践?——基于碳排放权交易试点政策的准自然实验[J]. 生态经济, 2024, 40(9): 161-168.
[3] 田金方, 李泰棒, 杨晓彤. 环境规制强度与ESG评级质量[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2024, 40(6): 58-69.
[4] 杨东宁, 周长辉. 企业自愿采用标准化环境管理体系的驱动力: 理论框架及实证分析[J]. 管理世界, 2005(2): 85-95, 107.
[5] Han, M., Zheng, D. and Gu, D. (2022) Driving Mechanism for Manufacturer’s Decision of Green Innovation: From the Perspectives of Manager Cognition and Behavior Selection. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 851180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Lyu, Y., Liu, X. and Lu, Y. (2025) Digital Transformation as an ESG Performance Catalyst with Insights from China’s External Governance. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 32589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Porter, M.E. and Linde, C.V.D. (1995) Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 97-118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 许金花, 叶妃三, 商丽霞. 公众环境关注度对企业碳绩效水平的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2024, 21(6): 865-875.
[9] Xu, X., Wang, S., Li, J. and Qiao, T. (2024) Environmental Regulatory Intensity, Green Finance and Corporate Green Sustainable Development Performance. Heliyon, 10, e30114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Christmann, P. and Taylor, G. (2006) Firm Self-Regulation through International Certifiable Standards: Determinants of Symbolic versus Substantive Implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 863-878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Berliner, D. and Prakash, A. (2014) Public Authority and Private Rules: How Domestic Regulatory Institutions Shape the Adoption of Global Private Regimes. International Studies Quarterly, 58, 793-803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Sica, A. and Giddens, A. (1986) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Contemporary Sociology, 15, 344-346.
[13] Barley, S.R. and Tolbert, P.S. (1997) Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution. Organization Studies, 18, 93-117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Wu, Y. and Tham, J. (2023) The Impact of Environmental Regulation, Environment, Social and Government Performance, and Technological Innovation on Enterprise Resilience under a Green Recovery. Heliyon, 9, e20278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Wang, X., Yang, Q. and He, N. (2020) Research on the Influence of Environmental Regulation on Social Employment—An Empirical Analysis Based on the STR Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, Article 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Jarzabkowski, P. (2008) Shaping Strategy as a Structuration Process. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 621-650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Delmas, M.A. and Montes-Sancho, M.J. (2011) An Institutional Perspective on the Diffusion of International Management System Standards: The Case of the Environmental Management Standard ISO 14001. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 103-132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Cole, M.A., Elliott, R.J.R. and Shimamoto, K. (2006) Globalization, Firm-Level Characteristics and Environmental Management: A Study of Japan. Ecological Economics, 59, 312-323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 于连超, 董晋亭, 张卫国, 等. ISO 14001环境认证对企业全要素生产率的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2022, 19(9): 1280-1287.
[20] 路江涌, 何文龙, 王铁民, 等. 外部压力、自我认知与企业标准化环境管理体系[J]. 经济科学, 2014(1): 114-125.
[21] Blackman, A. and Guerrero, S. (2012) What Drives Voluntary Eco-Certification in Mexico? Journal of Comparative Economics, 40, 256-268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] IS0 14001:2015 (2015) Environmental Management Systems—Requirements with a Guidance for Use.
[23] 白福萍, 梁博涵, 商梦亭. 高管环保背景如何促进提高企业ESG表现?——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 南方金融, 2024(10): 46-61.
[24] 王琳璘, 廉永辉, 董捷. ESG表现对企业价值的影响机制研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2022(5): 23-34.
[25] 魏宇琦, 高锦萍. 高管激励对企业ESG“漂绿”行为的影响研究[J/OL]. 科学学与科学技术管理: 1-25. 2025-11-11.[CrossRef
[26] Ragin, C.C. (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Beynon, M., Battisti, M., Jones, P. and Pickernell, D. (2020) How Institutions Matter in the Context of Business Exit: A Country Comparison Using GEM Data and FSQCA. British Journal of Management, 32, 832-851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] 余益伟, 杨玄酯, 张民, 等. 环境保护税如何影响制造业企业污水排放?——基于A股制造业上市公司的实证分析[J]. 税务研究, 2025(9): 55-63.
[29] 曾卓骐. 科技金融能否提高战略性新兴企业创新绩效? [J/OL]. 商业研究: 1-12. 2025-09-16.[CrossRef
[30] 王辉, 林伟芬, 谢锐. 高管环保背景与绿色投资者进入[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2022, 39(12): 173-194.
[31] 赵沁娜, 李航. ESG评级是否促进了企业绿色技术创新——来自中国上市公司的微观证据[J]. 南方经济, 2024(2): 116-135.
[32] 唐开翼, 欧阳娟, 甄杰, 等. 区域创新生态系统如何驱动创新绩效?——基于31个省市的模糊集定性比较分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2021, 42(7): 53-72.
[33] 杜运周, 贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA): 管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界, 2017(6): 155-167.
[34] Zschoch, M.A. (2011) Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, Benoit Rihoux and Charles Ragin, Eds., Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications, 2009, pp. xxv, 209. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 44, 743-746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] Verweij, S.S. (2013) Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16, 165-166.
[36] 程博, 闵思同, 胡朝会. 可持续发展报告鉴证程序研究[J]. 财会月刊, 2025, 46(18): 77-82.