基于CNKI和WOS数据库的植物物候研究文献计量分析
Bibliometric Analysis of Plant Phenology Research Based on CNKI and WOS Databases
DOI: 10.12677/br.2026.152013, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李罕琪*, 朱司司*, 王馨熠, 李云丹, 陆 清, 曾 举, 周瑞伍#:玉溪师范学院地理与国土工程学院,云南 玉溪
关键词: 植物物候文献计量分析可视化分析CNKIWOSPlant Phenology Bibliometric Analysis Visual Analysis CNKI WOS
摘要: 植物物候是反映气候变化影响生态系统的重要指示因子,也是国内外生态学研究的热点领域。为系统梳理该领域的研究动态、热点及发展趋势,本研究以CNKI和WOS数据库中1994~2024年间收录的相关学术论文为基础,运用VOSviewer和CiteSpace软件进行文献计量与可视化分析。结果表明:(1) 植物物候研究发文量总体呈上升趋势,中国、美国和挪威是发文量最多的国家,发文量最高的机构为中国科学院,核心作者包括挪威的Atle Mysterud和中国的常兆丰;(2) 中英文文献均高度关注“植物物候”“气候变化”和“物候期”等主题,但英文研究更侧重于微观机理和全球尺度模拟,中文研究则更多聚焦于典型区域的物候响应与应用实践;(3) 近三十年来,植物物候研究从早期的现象描述逐步转向对气候变化响应的机制探讨,并呈现出多技术融合、多过程耦合的发展特征。本研究可为把握植物物候领域的研究脉络和未来方向提供科学参考。
Abstract: Plant phenology is a key indicator reflecting the impact of climate change on ecosystems and has become a hotspot in ecological research both domestically and internationally. To systematically review the research dynamics, hotspots, and development trends in this field, this study conducted a bibliometric and visual analysis using relevant academic articles published between 1994 and 2024 from the CNKI and WOS databases, employing VOSviewer and CiteSpace software. The results show that: (1) The number of publications in plant phenology research has generally increased, with China, the United States, and Norway being the most productive countries. The Chinese Academy of Sciences is the most prolific institution, and core authors include Atle Mysterud from Norway and Zhaofeng Chang from China. (2) Both Chinese and English literature frequently focus on themes such as “plant phenology”, “climate change”, and “phenological phase”. However, English-language studies tend to emphasize micro‑level mechanisms and global‑scale modeling, while Chinese studies focus more on phenological responses and practical applications in typical regions. (3) Over the past three decades, plant phenology research has shifted from early descriptive studies to mechanistic investigations of responses to climate change, showing a trend toward multi-technology integration and multi‑process coupling. This study provides a scientific reference for understanding the research context and future directions in the field of plant phenology.
文章引用:李罕琪, 朱司司, 王馨熠, 李云丹, 陆清, 曾举, 周瑞伍. 基于CNKI和WOS数据库的植物物候研究文献计量分析[J]. 植物学研究, 2026, 15(2): 109-122. https://doi.org/10.12677/br.2026.152013

参考文献

[1] 李敏, 韩瑾璇, 胡俊峰, 杨毅立, 郑郁善, 陈凌艳. 园林植物物候研究展望[J]. 四川建筑, 2021, 41(6): 269-273.
[2] Shen, M., Wang, S., Jiang, N., Sun, J., Cao, R., Ling, X., et al. (2022) Plant Phenology Changes and Drivers on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3, 633-651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Piao, S., Liu, Q., Chen, A., Janssens, I.A., Fu, Y., Dai, J., Liu, L., Lian, X., Shen, M. and Zhu, X. (2019) Plant Phenology and Global Climate Change: Current Progresses and Challenges. Global Change Biology, 5, 1922-1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] de Jong, R., de Bruin, S., de Wit, A., Schaepman, M.E. and Dent, D.L. (2011) Analysis of Monotonic Greening and Browning Trends from Global NDVI Time-Series. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 692-702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 李静, 陈向晴, 于茜, 孙艳玲, 王辉, 崔铁军, 张晓阳. 基于MODIS数据的植被物候时空变化[J]. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 41(3): 66-74.
[6] 徐佳, 樊海东, 倪健. 1950-2015年中国植物物候变化的集成分析[J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 2019, 14(2): 1-11.
[7] 韩瑾璇, 李敏, 胡俊峰, 杨毅立, 陈凌艳. 植物物候变化研究进展[J]. 黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报, 2021, 34(5): 49-55.
[8] Yi, L., Jiang, H., Hong, F., Zhang Y., Bai, J. and Hu, D. (2025) Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends and Hotspots in the Field of Forest Musk Deer (Moschus berezovskii). JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 35, 307-319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 马勤, 杨继涛, 琚彤军, 李秧秧, 康博文, 同金霞. 基于文献计量的植物WUE研究现状分析[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2022, 37(6): 266-272.
[10] 肖鹏飞, 吴德东. 全球植物修复研究文献计量分析[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(21): 8685-8695.
[11] 赵摇. 基于CNKI数据库的植被遥感监测文献计量分析[J]. 智慧农业导刊, 2023, 3(13): 17-20.
[12] 代武君, 金慧颖, 张玉红, 周志强, 刘彤. 植物物候学研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(19): 6705-6719.