基于DIA蛋白质组学解析菲律宾蛤仔壳色分化的多通路协同调控机制
Multi-Pathway Coordinated Regulatory Mechanisms Underlying Shell Color Differentiation in Ruditapes philippinarum Revealed by DIA-Based Proteomics
DOI: 10.12677/ojfr.2026.131009, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 吴思润, 梁誉腾, 吴牧雨, 马雪娇:大连海洋大学水产与生命学院,辽宁 大连;高志鹰, 霍忠明, 刘 洋:辽宁省贝类良种繁育工程技术研究中心,辽宁 大连
关键词: 菲律宾蛤仔DIA蛋白质组学壳色分化溶酶体通路分子机制Ruditapes philippinarum DIA Proteomics Shell Color Differentiation Lysosome Pathway Molecular Mechanism
摘要: 为揭示菲律宾蛤仔(Ruditapes philippinarum)同一壳体黑白壳区域色泽分化的分子机制,本研究采用数据非依赖采集(DIA)蛋白质组学技术,对黑壳(B组)与白壳(W组)区域对应的外套膜组织进行差异蛋白筛选及功能解析。通过主成分分析(PCA)验证样本重复性,结合P值(<0.05)与差异倍数(FC ≥ 1.5或≤1/1.5)筛选显著差异蛋白,同步开展GO功能富集与KEGG通路富集分析。结果显示,共筛选获得1500个显著差异表达蛋白,其中下调蛋白数量(1117个)约为上调蛋白(383个)的2.9倍,提示蛋白表达抑制在壳色分化中占主导。KEGG富集分析发现,差异蛋白显著富集于溶酶体、SNARE、Spliceosome三条核心通路:溶酶体通路中CTSL、CTSS蛋白下调抑制壳基质更新;SNARE通路Syntaxin、SNAP-25等蛋白下调阻碍囊泡运输与色素分泌;Spliceosome通路SF3B/U2复合体、PRPF/SF蛋白下调影响转录后RNA加工效率。三条通路与能量代谢通路协同作用,形成“能量代谢–物质分泌–转录后加工”的调控网络,共同介导蛤仔壳色差异。本研究从蛋白质组层面揭示了蛤仔壳色分化的多通路协同调控机制,填补了贝类壳色形成中RNA加工层面调控的研究空白,为蛤仔壳色性状的分子育种提供理论依据。
Abstract: To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying color differentiation between black and white shell regions within the same shell of the Manila clam (Ruditapes philippinarum), this study employed data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics to identify and functionally characterize differentially expressed proteins in mantle tissues corresponding to black (B group) and white (W group) shell areas. Sample reproducibility was validated by principal component analysis (PCA). Significantly differentially expressed proteins were screened using a P value (<0.05) combined with fold-change criteria (FC ≥ 1.5 or ≤1/1.5), followed by Gene Ontology (GO) functional enrichment and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses. The results identified a total of 1,500 significantly differentially expressed proteins were identified, among which downregulated proteins (1117) were approximately 2.9 times more abundant than upregulated proteins (383), indicating that suppression of protein expression plays a dominant role in shell color differentiation. KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that these proteins were significantly enriched in three core pathways: lysosome, SNARE, and spliceosome. In the lysosome pathway, downregulation of CTSL and CTSS inhibited shell matrix turnover; in the SNARE pathway, reduced expression of proteins such as syntaxin and SNAP-25 impeded vesicle transport and pigment secretion; and in the spliceosome pathway, downregulation of the SF3B/U2 complex and PRPF/SF proteins affected the efficiency of post-transcriptional RNA processing. These three pathways act synergistically with energy metabolism pathways to form an integrated regulatory network of “energy metabolism - material secretion - post-transcriptional processing”, collectively mediating shell color differences in the Manila clam. At the proteomic level, this study reveals a multi-pathway coordinated regulatory mechanism underlying shell color differentiation, fills a knowledge gap regarding RNA-processing-level regulation in molluscan shell coloration, and provides a theoretical basis for molecular breeding of shell color traits in clams.
文章引用:吴思润, 梁誉腾, 吴牧雨, 马雪娇, 高志鹰, 霍忠明, 刘洋. 基于DIA蛋白质组学解析菲律宾蛤仔壳色分化的多通路协同调控机制[J]. 水产研究, 2026, 13(1): 67-81. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojfr.2026.131009

参考文献

[1] Marin, F., Luquet, G., Marie, B. and Medakovic, D. (2008) Molluscan Shell Proteins: Primary Structure, Origin, and Evolution. In: Current Topics in Developmental Biology, Elsevier, 209-276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Addadi, L. and Weiner, S. (2014) Biomineralization: Mineral Formation by Organisms. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 83, 439-466.
[3] Sun, X., Liu, Z., Zhou, L., Wu, B., Dong, Y. and Yang, A. (2016) Integration of Next Generation Sequencing and EPR Analysis to Uncover Molecular Mechanism Underlying Shell Color Variation in Scallops. PLOS ONE, 11, e0161876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Song, X., Li, L., Zhang, G. and Guo, X. (2020) Transcriptomic and Proteomic Insights into Shell Color Formation in the Clam Ruditapes philippinarum. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 17421.
[5] Chen, J., Huang, J., Zeng, Q., Xu, L. and Zhang, C. (2021) Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Potential Genes Involved in Shell Color Formation in Ruditapes philippinarum. Aquaculture Research, 52, 1135-1148.
[6] Suzuki, M., Saruwatari, K., Kogure, T., Yamamoto, Y., Nishimura, T., Kato, T., et al. (2009) An Acidic Matrix Protein, Pif, Is a Key Macromolecule for Nacre Formation. Science, 325, 1388-1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Mann, K. and Jackson, D.J. (2014) Characterization of Mollusc Shell Matrix Proteins by Quantitative Proteomics. Proteomics, 14, 2545-2556.
[8] Zhang, C., Xie, L. and Zhang, R. (2020) Energy Metabolism and Shell Formation in Mollusks: Molecular Insights and Applications. Frontiers in Physiology, 11, Article 1040.
[9] Pu, J., Li, C., Chen, J., Li, Y. and Zhang, G. (2021) mTOR Signaling Pathway Regulates Shell Biomineralization in the Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, Article 674229.
[10] Zhang, G., Fang, X., Guo, X., Li, L. and Zhang, L. (2019) Lysosomal Activity and Shell Matrix Remodeling in Mollusk Biomineralization. Scientific Reports, 9, Article No. 5751.
[11] Kinoshita, S., Wang, N., Inoue, H. and Maeyama, K. (2021) Proteomic Analysis of Shell Matrix Proteins from the Japanese Pearl Oyster Pinctada fucata. Marine Biotechnology, 23, 381-393.
[12] Liu, X., He, M., Huang, H. and Zhang, L. (2018) Identification of Shell Matrix Proteins Related to Shell Color in the Scallop Chlamys nobilis. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part D: Genomics and Proteomics, 25, 12-21.
[13] Wang, X., Li, Y., Guo, H., Chen, J. and Li, C. (2022) Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Reveals Key Proteins Involved in Shell Color Differentiation in Meretrix meretrix. Journal of Proteomics, 260, Article 104549.
[14] Li, Y., Song, X., Chen, J., and Zhang, C. (2024) Proteomic Insights into Shell Pigmentation Mechanisms in Bivalves. Marine Biotechnology, 26, 99-113.
[15] Cox, J. and Mann, M. (2008) MaxQuant Enables High Peptide Identification Rates, Individualized p.p.b.-Range Mass Accuracies and Proteome-Wide Protein Quantification. Nature Biotechnology, 26, 1367-1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Cox, J., Neuhauser, N., Michalski, A., Scheltema, R.A., Olsen, J.V. and Mann, M. (2011) Andromeda: A Peptide Search Engine Integrated into the MaxQuant Environment. Journal of Proteome Research, 10, 1794-1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Parker, S.J., Rost, H., Rosenberger, G., Collins, B.C., Malmström, L., Amodei, D., et al. (2015) Identification of a Set of Conserved Eukaryotic Internal Retention Time Standards for Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 14, 2800-2813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Martinez-Val, A., Bekker-Jensen, D.B., Hogrebe, A. and Olsen, J.V. (2021) Data Processing and Analysis for Dia-Based Phosphoproteomics Using Spectronaut. In: Methods in Molecular Biology, Springer, 95-107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Vaudel, M., Burkhart, J.M., Sickmann, A., Martens, L. and Zahedi, R.P. (2011) Peptide Identification Quality Control. Proteomics, 11, 2105-2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Rozanova, S., Uszkoreit, J., Schork, K., Serschnitzki, B., Eisenacher, M., Tönges, L., et al. (2023) Quality Control—A Stepchild in Quantitative Proteomics: A Case Study for the Human CSF Proteome. Biomolecules, 13, Article 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Ashburner, M., Ball, C.A., Blake, J.A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J.M., et al. (2000) Gene Ontology: Tool for the Unification of Biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nature Genetics, 25, 25-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Sato, Y., Furumichi, M. and Tanabe, M. (2012) KEGG for Integration and Interpretation of Large-Scale Molecular Data Sets. Nucleic Acids Research, 40, D109-D114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Turk, V., Stoka, V., Vasiljeva, O., Renko, M., Sun, T., Turk, B., et al. (2012) Cysteine Cathepsins: From Structure, Function and Regulation to New Frontiers. Biochimica et Biophysica ActaProteins and Proteomics, 1824, 68-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Reiser, J., Adair, B. and Reinheckel, T. (2010) Specialized Roles for Cysteine Cathepsins in Health and Disease. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 120, 3421-3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Ding, J., Wen, Q., Huo, Z., Nie, H., Qin, Y. and Yan, X. (2021) Identification of Shell-Color-Related MicroRNAs in the Manila Clam Ruditapes philippinarum Using High-Throughput Sequencing of Small RNA Transcriptomes. Scientific Reports, 11, Article No. 8044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Liu, J., Yang, D., Liu, S., Li, S., Xu, G., Zheng, G., et al. (2015) Microarray: A Global Analysis of Biomineralization-Related Gene Expression Profiles during Larval Development in the Pearl Oyster, Pinctada fucata. BMC Genomics, 16, Article No. 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Marie, B., Joubert, C., Tayalé, A., Zanella-Cléon, I., Belliard, C., Piquemal, D., et al. (2012) Different Secretory Repertoires Control the Biomineralization Processes of Prism and Nacre Deposition of the Pearl Oyster Shell. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 20986-20991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Droga-Mazovec, G., Bojič, L., Petelin, A., Ivanova, S., Romih, R., Repnik, U., et al. (2008) Cysteine Cathepsins Trigger Caspase-Dependent Cell Death through Cleavage of Bid and Antiapoptotic Bcl-2 Homologues. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 283, 19140-19150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Ivanina, A.V., Falfushynska, H.I., Beniash, E., Piontkivska, H. and Sokolova, I.M. (2017) Biomineralization-Related Specialization of Hemocytes and Mantle Tissues of the Pacific Oysters Crassostrea gigas. Journal of Experimental Biology, 220, 3209-3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Jahn, R. and Scheller, R.H. (2006) SNAREs—Engines for Membrane Fusion. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 7, 631-643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Südhof, T.C. and Rothman, J.E. (2009) Membrane Fusion: Grappling with SNARE and SM Proteins. Science, 323, 474-477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Hong, W. (2005) Snares and Traffic. Biochimica et Biophysica ActaMolecular Cell Research, 1744, 120-144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Fang, D., Xu, G., Hu, Y., Pan, C., Xie, L. and Zhang, R. (2011) Identification of Novel Genes Involved in Shell Formation in the Pearl Oyster Pinctada fucata. Marine Biotechnology, 13, 624-632.
[34] Rizo, J. and Xu, J. (2015) The Synaptic Vesicle Release Machinery. Annual Review of Biophysics, 44, 339-367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Wahl, M.C., Will, C.L. and Lührmann, R. (2009) The Spliceosome: Design Principles of a Dynamic RNP Machine. Cell, 136, 701-718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Will, C.L. and Luhrmann, R. (2010) Spliceosome Structure and Function. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 3, a003707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Matera, A.G. and Wang, Z. (2014) A Day in the Life of the Spliceosome. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 15, 108-121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Papasaikas, P. and Valcárcel, J. (2016) The Spliceosome: The Ultimate RNA Chaperone and Sculptor. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 41, 33-45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Cretu, C., Schmitzová, J., Ponce-Salvatierra, A., Dybkov, O., De Laurentiis, E.I., Sharma, K., et al. (2016) Molecular Architecture of SF3b and Structural Consequences of Its Cancer-Related Mutations. Molecular Cell, 64, 307-319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Lee, S.C. and Abdel-Wahab, O. (2016) Therapeutic Targeting of Splicing in Cancer. Nature Medicine, 22, 976-986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Chen, W. and Moore, M.J. (2015) Spliceosomes. Current Biology, 25, R181-R183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]