不同磷形态提取方法在南四湖沉积物中的应用比较研究
Comparative Study on the Application of Different Phosphorus Extraction Methods in Sediments of Nan Si Lake
DOI: 10.12677/aep.2026.163034, PDF,   
作者: 陈朋金:烟台大学土木工程学院,山东 烟台
关键词: 磷形态提取方法沉积物南四湖Phosphorus Forms Extraction Methods Sediments South Four Lakes
摘要: 磷是水体富营养化的关键限制性因子之一,其在水体–沉积物系统中的迁移转化与环境行为备受关注。本文以南四湖7个点位(D1, D2, D3, N1, N2, N3, N4)沉积物为研究对象,采用Hieltjes-Lijklema法(H-L法)、Rydin法、Psenner法和SMT法四种常用磷形态提取方法,对沉积物中不同形态磷进行系统提取与对比分析。结果表明,不同提取方法在磷形态分类、提取效率及形态分配上存在显著差异,其中H-L法提取的总磷含量最高,SMT法提取的在Fe/Al-P和Ca-P与其它方法相比具有较好的可比性。Rydin法和Psenner法在Fe/Al-P的提取中表现出较高灵敏度,适用于研究Fe/Al-P的环境行为。本文通过对比分析不同方法的提取结果,揭示了各方法在磷形态识别中的优势与局限性,为南四湖沉积物磷形态的环境风险评估与治理提供科学依据。
Abstract: Phosphorus is one of the key limiting factors for eutrophication in water bodies, and its migration, transformation and environmental behavior in the water-sediment system have attracted much attention. This paper takes the sediments from seven sites (D1, D2, D3, N1, N2, N3, and N4) in the South Four Lakes as the research object and uses four commonly used phosphorus fractionation methods, namely the Hieltjes-Lijklema method (H-L method), Rydin method, Psenner method and SMT method, to systematically extract and comparatively analyze different forms of phosphorus in the sediments. The results show that there are significant differences among the four methods in terms of phosphorus fraction classification, extraction efficiency and fraction distribution. Among them, the H-L method has the highest total phosphorus content, and the Fe/Al-P and Ca-P extracted by the SMT method have better comparability with those extracted by other methods. The Rydin method and Psenner method show high sensitivity in the extraction of Fe/Al-P and are suitable for studying the environmental behavior of iron and aluminum-bound phosphorus. Through the comparative analysis of the extraction results of different methods, this paper reveals the advantages and limitations of each method in phosphorus fraction identification, providing a scientific basis for the environmental risk assessment and management of phosphorus fractions in the sediments of the South Four Lakes.
文章引用:陈朋金. 不同磷形态提取方法在南四湖沉积物中的应用比较研究[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2026, 16(3): 326-333. https://doi.org/10.12677/aep.2026.163034

参考文献

[1] 金相灿, 王圣瑞, 庞燕. 湖泊沉积物磷形态及其生物可利用性研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2004, 24(6): 1083-1088.
[2] Sondergaard, M., Jensen, J.P. and Jeppesen, E. (2003) Role of Sediment and Internal Loading of Phosphorus in Shallow Lakes. Hydrobiologia, 506, 135-145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Psenner, R., Bostrom, B. and Pettersson, K. (1988) Phosphorus Fractions in Lake Sediments. Hydrobiologia, 159, 281-292.
[4] Wang, S.R., Jin, X.C. and Zhang, Y.L. (2006) Phosphorus Fractions and Their Bioavailability in Sediments from the Shallow Lakes in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River, China. Environmental Pollution, 144, 723-731.
[5] Ruban, V., Demare, J.L., Lucotte, M., et al. (1999) A Single Solution Reagent for the Determination of Phosphorus in Sea Water. Marine Chemistry, 64, 169-177.
[6] Hedley, M.J., Stewart, J.W.B. and Chauhan, B.S. (1982) Changes in Inorganic and Organic Soil Phosphorus Fractions Induced by Cultivation Practices and by Laboratory Incubations. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 46, 970-976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 张乃明, 史静, 褚素贞. 不同提取方法对土壤磷形态分析结果的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2005, 36(2): 204-207.
[8] 刘敏, 侯立军, 许世远, 等. 长江口潮滩沉积物中磷的形态分布及其环境意义[J]. 环境科学, 2002, 23(5): 12-17.
[9] 王军, 周孝德, 陈宏平, 等. 不同提取方法对河流沉积物磷形态分析的影响[J]. 环境科学研究, 2008, 21(3): 113-117.
[10] 山东省环境保护厅. 山东省环境状况公报[R]. 济南: 山东省环境保护厅, 2025.
[11] 李军, 张祖陆, 郑西来, 等. 南四湖沉积物磷污染特征及释放风险评价[J]. 环境科学, 2010, 31(8): 1792-1798.
[12] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
[13] 王庆改, 张祖陆, 张文静, 等. 南四湖沉积物重金属污染及潜在生态风险评价[J]. 环境科学学报, 2012, 32(7): 1733-1741.