电商平台分期支付影响交易规模与用户粘性的理论机制研究
Research on the Theoretical Mechanism of E-Commerce Platform Installment Payment Affecting Transaction Scale and User Stickiness
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.154413, PDF,   
作者: 曹琪琪:南京邮电大学管理学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 分期支付交易规模用户粘性Installment Payments Transaction Scale User Retention
摘要: 分期支付已成为电商平台主流支付方式,但其影响交易规模与用户粘性的内在机理尚待系统阐释。本文基于消费者行为理论与心理账户理论,构建分期支付影响效应的整合分析框架。研究发现,分期支付通过三重机制扩张交易规模:支付痛感的时间稀释效应削弱即期支付的心理成本,感知财务约束的缓解效应降低消费门槛,心理账户的柔性重构效应改变资金的认知归属性。在用户粘性建构方面,分期支付通过体验价值的内化沉淀、习惯形成的路径依赖、以及信用资本的锁定效应,形成用户留存的行为惯性。进一步分析揭示,交易规模扩张与用户粘性建构之间存在内在张力:过度授信可能引发逆向筛选与债务累积,反而侵蚀长期用户关系。本文为理解数字支付时代的消费行为提供了理论视角,也为平台在追求商业目标的同时兼顾消费者福祉与金融稳定提供了实践启示。
Abstract: Installment payments have become a mainstream payment method on e-commerce platforms, yet the underlying mechanisms through which they influence transaction scale and user retention remain to be systematically elucidated. This paper constructs an integrated analytical framework for the impact of instalment payments, grounded in consumer behaviour theory and mental accounting theory. Findings reveal that instalment payments expand transaction scale through three mechanisms: the temporal dilution effect of payment pain reduces the psychological cost of immediate payment; the perceived easing of financial constraints lowers consumption thresholds; and the flexible restructuring effect of mental accounts alters the cognitive attribution of funds. Regarding user retention, instalment payments foster behavioural inertia through the internalisation of experiential value, path dependence in habit formation, and the lock-in effect of credit capital. Further analysis reveals an inherent tension between transaction scale expansion and user retention: excessive credit granting may trigger adverse selection and debt accumulation, thereby eroding long-term user relationships. This paper offers a theoretical perspective for understanding consumer behavior in the era of digital payments, while also providing practical insights for platforms to balance consumer welfare and financial stability alongside their pursuit of commercial objectives.
文章引用:曹琪琪. 电商平台分期支付影响交易规模与用户粘性的理论机制研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(4): 415-421. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.154413

参考文献

[1] 冯在. “先买后付”能促进消费吗[N]. 中国税务报, 2025-11-26(008).
[2] 李婷婷, 吴心怡. 考虑消费者退货下基于双通道心理账户的先享后付购买方式研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2024, 33(3): 118-124.
[3] Maesen, S. and Ang, D. (2025) Buy Now, Pay Later: Impact of Installment Payments on Customer Purchases. Journal of Marketing, 89, 13-35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 王力. 网络零售商的分期付款利率与产品定价研究[J]. 商业经济研究, 2025(3): 189-192.
[5] 曾颖. 互联网消费金融用户持续使用意愿影响因素研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 江西财经大学, 2019.
[6] 吴水龙, 王雪蕾, 袁永娜, 蒋廉雄. 分期消费下物质主义价值观对购买意愿的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2020, 17(12): 1831-1838+1880.
[7] Li, J., Xv, L. and Xv, S.Z. (2025) Just Show the Option: Adding a BNPL Payment Option in Online Shopping Can Nudge Purchase Intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, Article 101536.
[8] 陈玉聪, 杨俊, 张玉林. 基于TPB/UTAUT和信任的使用意愿影响因素研究[J]. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2020, 51(6): 70-78.
[9] 陆阳, 王健, 庄新田. 消费分期还款顺序对消费者购买意愿的影响研究——价格吸引力和受操纵感的中介作用[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(3): 39-47.
[10] Di Maggio, M., Katz, J. and Williams, E. (2022) Buy Now, Pay Later Credit: User Characteristics and Effects on Spending Patterns. NBER Working Paper No. 30508.
[11] 郝旭光. “心理账户”: 透视个体消费行为缘何违背常识? [N]. 北京日报, 2017-10-16(26).
[12] 郝旭光. 心理账户理论可解释许多非理性消费行为[N]. 上海证券报, 2017-10-24(9).
[13] 王丽丽. 消费者循环信用和小额分期付款使用行为研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2010.
[14] 张昊. 电商短期信贷息费优惠、降价与促消费: “分期免息”能带来好处吗? [J]. 商业经济与管理, 2024(6): 5-17.