基于AHP和模糊综合评价法的锂电池生产线管理水平研究
Study on the Management Level of Lithium Battery Production Line Based on AHP and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method
摘要: 锂电池作为新能源产业的核心基础元器件,在全球能源结构转型与智能制造升级的双重推动下,市场需求呈爆发式增长。生产车间作为制造企业创造核心价值的关键单元,其管理水平直接影响企业的生产效率、产品品质与市场响应效率。本文选取F企业锂电池生产线作为研究对象,搭建以人、机、料、法、环为核心的锂电池生产线管理水平评价体系,依托专家打分法,运用层次分析法测算出该体系中人、机、料、法、环各一级指标及对应二级指标的权重;同时通过问卷调查,结合模糊综合评价法对生产线各影响因素的实际表现开展量化评价。评价结果显示,方法因素在权重与评价值上均处于首位,是当前生产线管理的优势模块;设备因素权重位列第二,评价值却仅略高于权重最低的环境因素,成为制约整体管理水平提升的关键短板;环境因素的权重与评价值均为最低,根据“木桶效应”应该重视环境管理的提升。本文最终从设备、环境、材料、人员、方法五大维度,针对性提出生产线管理的优化策略。
Abstract: As a core basic component of the new energy industry, lithium-ion batteries are experiencing explosive growth in market demand driven by the dual forces of global energy structure transformation and intelligent manufacturing upgrading. As a key unit for creating core value in manufacturing enterprises, the management level of production workshops directly affects enterprises’ production efficiency, product quality and market response efficiency. This paper takes the lithium-ion battery production line of Enterprise F as the research object and constructs an evaluation system for the management level of lithium-ion battery production lines with man, machine, material, method and environment as the core. Based on the expert scoring method, the analytic hierarchy process is used to calculate the weights of the first-level indicators and corresponding second-level indicators of man, machine, material, method and environment in the system. Meanwhile, through questionnaire surveys and combined with the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, a quantitative evaluation is conducted on the actual performance of various influencing factors of the production line. The evaluation results show that the method factor ranks first in both weight and evaluation value, serving as the advantageous module of current production line management. The machine factor ranks second in weight, but its evaluation value is only slightly higher than that of the environment factor with the lowest weight, making it a key shortcoming restricting the improvement of overall management level. Both the weight and evaluation value of the environment factor are the lowest. According to the “cask effect”, attention should be paid to the improvement of environmental management. Finally, this paper puts forward targeted optimization strategies for production line management from five dimensions: machine, environment, material, man and method.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王港. 基于精益生产的P公司车间生产管理优化研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2023.
|
|
[2]
|
王昕. 基于精益管理思想的Z公司机加工生产线生产管理改进研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2024.
|
|
[3]
|
李华增, 孙小明. 生产现场系统化改善的应用性研究[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2004(2): 81-86.
|
|
[4]
|
任一啸, 沈琦, 张嘉伟. 工业工程在生产线优化中的应用探讨[J]. 工程技术研究, 2019, 4(16): 237-238.
|
|
[5]
|
叶至东. 精益思想在汽车装配产线中的应用[J]. 时代汽车, 2023(19): 25-27.
|
|
[6]
|
孙伟. 精益生产理论在洗煤生产安全管理中的应用[J]. 能源与节能, 2024(3): 234-237.
|
|
[7]
|
王娜, 王娟, 叶顺坚, 等. 精益管理在航天产品生产过程质量管控中的探索与实践[J]. 质量与可靠性, 2022(3): 1-6.
|
|
[8]
|
张雅蒙, 李少波. 基于AHP-DEMATEL-ISM的制造业生产效率关键影响因素研究[J]. 内燃机与配件, 2023(2): 115-117.
|
|
[9]
|
陈耀湘. “人机料法环”在飞机维修现场安全管控的运用[J]. 产品可靠性报告, 2023(9): 50-52.
|
|
[10]
|
杨金海, 梁丹凤, 熊浩阳. 站类产品车间内部质量管理研究——以盈峰环境科技集团有限公司为例[J]. 中国储运, 2024(8): 147-148.
|
|
[11]
|
陈婉红. 基于质量管理与“人机料法环”的食品厂质量控制问题与策略研究[J]. 食品安全导刊, 2025(16): 68-72.
|
|
[12]
|
黄艳, 郑晶磊, 张芾, 吕铮, 王华东. 基于模糊层次分析的炼化企业资产完整性管理成熟度评价[J]. 中国设备工程, 2024(17): 14-17.
|
|
[13]
|
邓一丁. 基于精益生产的H公司生产线优化[J]. 销售与管理, 2025(1): 72-74.
|
|
[14]
|
王敏. “木桶效应”对基层“单套制”推广应用的影响及对策——基于平顶山市、县公共机构业务信息系统数据库清单的调查分析报告[J]. 档案管理, 2019(4): 57-59.
|