篮球教学对于初中生积极心理发展影响的实验研究
Experimental Study on the Influence of Basketball Teaching on the Positive Psychological Development of Junior High School Students
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2026.166310, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李媛媛:武汉体育学院体育教育学院,湖北 武汉;洪晓彬:武汉体育学院心理学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: 篮球初中生积极心理Basketball Junior High School Students Positive Psychology
摘要: 目的:本研究旨在探讨篮球教学干预对初中生积极心理发展的影响。方法:以初中生为研究对象,采用随机对照实验设计,将其分为实验组(篮球教学组,n = 44)与对照组(田径教学组,n = 42),两组均接受为期一学期的教学干预。采用青少年积极心理发展量表,分别对两组研究对象进行干预前测与后测,通过独立样本t检验、两因素方差分析对干预效果进行统计检验。结果:干预前,实验组与对照组的积极心理发展水平无显著差异(t = 1.12, p = 0.266);干预后,实验组积极心理发展水平显著高于对照组(t = 2.26, p = 0.009)。两因素方差分析结果显示,时间主效应显著(F = 31.51, p = 0.001),表明两种教学干预均能提升初中生整体积极心理水平;组别主效应显著(F = 4.12, p = 0.045),提示篮球教学干预效果优于田径教学干预;时间与组别的交互作用显著(F = 16.70, p = 0.001),进一步简单效应分析表明,仅在干预后,实验组积极心理发展水平显著高于对照组。
Abstract: Objective: This study aims to explore the effect of basketball teaching intervention on the positive psychological development of junior high school students. Methods: Junior high school students were selected as research subjects and divided into an experimental group (basketball teaching group, n = 44) and a control group (track and field teaching group, n = 42) using a randomized controlled trial design. Both groups received one semester of teaching intervention. The Adolescent Positive Psychological Development Scale was used to conduct pre-intervention and post-intervention tests on the two groups respectively. Independent-samples t-test and two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) were adopted to statistically examine the intervention effects. Results: Before the intervention, there was no significant difference in the level of positive psychological development between the experimental group and the control group (t = 1.12, p = 0.266); after the intervention, the level of positive psychological development in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (t = 2.26, p = 0.009). The results of two-factor ANOVA showed that the main effect of time was significant (F = 31.51, p = 0.001), indicating that both teaching interventions could improve the overall positive psychological level of junior high school students; the main effect of group was significant (F = 4.12, p = 0.045), suggesting that the effect of basketball teaching intervention was superior to that of track and field teaching intervention; the interaction effect between time and group was significant (F = 16.70, p = 0.001). Further simple effect analysis revealed that the level of positive psychological development in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group only after the intervention.
文章引用:李媛媛, 洪晓彬 (2026). 篮球教学对于初中生积极心理发展影响的实验研究. 心理学进展, 16(6), 228-233. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.166310

参考文献

[1] 柴晓运, 李晓燕, 曹娟, 等(2020). 中国青少年积极发展量表(简版)的编制: 基于一个大样本数据. 心理与行为研究, 18(5), 631-637.
[2] 胡楠, 黄丹丹, 郑洪珠, 等(2023). 身体活动对大学生积极心理品质的影响——基于深度神经网络分析. 体育学刊, 30(4), 118-123.
[3] 刘光宇(2017). 探索与启示: 美国校园篮球文化发展研究. 沈阳体育学院学报, 36(5), 47-52.
[4] 卢元镇, 马廉祯, 孙麒麟, 等(2026). 运动项目文化研究. 体育学刊, 33(1), 1-22.
[5] 吕健, 王勇, 阿提拉∙阿巴提(2025). 篮球课程思政课教学时代价值、现实困境与实践路径研究. 体育世界, (10), 107-109.
[6] 张红英, 王军, 李新影, 等(2017). 我国留守青少年积极心理品质对抑郁症状的影响. 中国健康教育, 33(5), 387-391.
[7] 中国心理科学研究院(2023). 2022年青少年心理健康状况调查报告. 社会科学出版社.
[8] 朱旺, 牟柳, 温继怀, 等(2026). 教练员领导方式对青少年篮球运动员亲反社会行为的影响. 湖北体育科技, 45(2), 76-82.
[9] Ayranci, M., & Aydin, M. K. (2025). The Complex Interplay between Psychological Factors and Sports Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. PLOS One, 20, e0330862.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Bruner, M. W., McLaren, C. D., Sutcliffe, J. T., Gardner, L. A., Lubans, D. R., Smith, J. J. et al. (2023). The Effect of Sport-Based Interventions on Positive Youth Development: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16, 368-395.[CrossRef
[11] Chuning, A. E., Durham, M. R., Killgore, W. D. S., & Smith, R. (2024). Psychological Resilience and Hardiness as Protective Factors in the Relationship between Depression/Anxiety and Well-Being: Exploratory and Confirmatory Evidence. Personality and Individual Differences, 225, Article ID: 112664.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Corti, J. F., Raimundi, M. J., Celsi, I., Alvarez, O., & Castillo, I. (2023). The Moderating Effect of Athletes’ Personal Values on the Relationship between Coaches’ Leadership Behaviors and the Personal and Social Skills of Young Basketball Players. Sustainability, 15, Article 4554.[CrossRef
[13] Freire, T., & Ferreira, G. (2018). Health-Related Quality of Life of Adolescents: Relations with Positive and Negative Psychological Dimensions. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 23, 11-24.[CrossRef
[14] Haoran, S., Tianci, L., Hanwen, C., Baole, T., Yiran, C., & Yan, J. (2023). The Impact of Basketball on the Social Adjustment of Chinese Middle School Students: The Chain Mediating Role of Interpersonal Relationships and Self-Identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1205760.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Locke, E. A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Personnel Psychology, 50, 801.
[16] Meulenbeek, K., Loheide‐Niesmann, L., Spagnuolo, F., & Cima, M. J. (2026). Positive Youth Development and Prosocial Behavior: A Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta‐analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 98, 7-35.[CrossRef
[17] Morales-Belando, M. T., Côté, J., & Arias-Estero, J. L. (2023). A Longitudinal Examination of the Influence of Winning or Losing with Motivational Climate as a Mediator on Enjoyment, Perceived Competence, and Intention to Be Physically Active in Youth Basketball. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 28, 568-581.[CrossRef
[18] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.[CrossRef
[19] White, R. L., Vella, S., Biddle, S., Sutcliffe, J., Guagliano, J. M., Uddin, R. et al. (2024). Physical Activity and Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Best-Evidence Synthesis of Mediation and Moderation Studies. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 21, Article No. 134.[CrossRef] [PubMed]