任务厌恶对大学生拖延注意偏向的影响:来自眼动追踪的证据
The Effect of Task Aversion on Attentional Bias in College Students’ Procrastination: Evidence from Eye-Tracking
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2026.166311, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张琳琳, 李瑞琳, 刘栖伶, 李 杰, 周思怡:西南交通大学希望学院基础部,四川 成都
关键词: 拖延任务厌恶注意偏向眼动追踪大学生Procrastination Task Aversion Attentional Bias Eye-Tracking College Students
摘要: 拖延是指个体尽管预见到可能带来不利后果,仍自愿推迟计划性任务的行为,在大学生群体中尤为普遍。任务厌恶是引发拖延的关键认知因素,但其影响个体注意偏向的微观机制尚不明确。本研究采用眼动追踪技术,探讨不同任务厌恶水平对大学生拖延相关词汇注意偏向的影响。研究采用3 (任务厌恶水平:高、中、低) × 2 (词汇类型:拖延词汇、非拖延词汇)两因素被试内实验设计,选取35名大学生为被试,记录其平均注视时长、首次注视时长、注视点个数、首次注视前时长、反应时及正确率。结果发现:(1) 注视点个数上,任务厌恶水平主效应显著(F = 6.617, p < 0.05),高厌恶情境下注视点个数更多;(2) 首次注视时长上,任务厌恶与词汇类型交互作用显著(F = 6.959, p < 0.05),仅在高厌恶情境下,拖延词汇的首次注视时长显著短于非拖延词汇(t = −3.420, p < 0.001);(3) 其他指标的主效应与交互效应均不显著。研究表明,拖延词汇的注意偏向具有情境依赖性,高任务厌恶情境下,拖延语义能更快捕获个体注意,而任务厌恶主要通过调节早期注意捕获速度而非后期加工深度来影响拖延行为。本研究为拖延的情绪调节理论提供了眼动证据,并为高校拖延干预提供了理论依据。
Abstract: Procrastination refers to the voluntary delay of planned tasks despite the anticipation of potential negative consequences, and it is particularly prevalent among college students. Task aversion is a key cognitive factor triggering procrastination, yet its underlying mechanism affecting attentional bias remains unclear. Using eye-tracking technology, this study investigated the influence of different levels of task aversion on college students’ attentional bias toward procrastination-related words. A 3 (task aversion: high, medium, low) × 2 (word type: procrastination words, non-procrastination words) within-subjects experimental design was adopted, with 35 college students as participants. Six indices were recorded: average fixation duration, first fixation duration, fixation count, time to first fixation, reaction time, and accuracy. The results showed that: (1) For fixation count, the main effect of task aversion level was significant (F = 6.617, p < 0.05), with more fixations in the high-aversion condition; (2) For first fixation duration, the interaction between task aversion and word type was significant (F = 6.959, p < 0.05). Specifically, only in the high-aversion condition was the first fixation duration significantly shorter for procrastination words than for non-procrastination words (t = −3.420, p < 0.001); (3) No significant main or interaction effects were found for the other indices. The findings indicate that attentional bias toward procrastination words is context-dependent. In high task-aversion situations, procrastination-related semantics capture attention more quickly, and task aversion influences procrastination mainly by regulating early attentional capture rather than later processing depth. This study provides eye-tracking evidence for the affect regulation theory of procrastination and offers a theoretical basis for procrastination interventions in college settings.
文章引用:张琳琳, 李瑞琳, 刘栖伶, 李杰, 周思怡 (2026). 任务厌恶对大学生拖延注意偏向的影响:来自眼动追踪的证据. 心理学进展, 16(6), 234-246. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.166311

参考文献

[1] 白文金(2020). 大学生学习拖延与时间管理倾向的关系及其干预研究. 硕士学位论文, 昆明: 云南师范大学.
[2] 陈俊, 易晓文(2009). 拖延行为个体对人格特征词、拖延词的注意偏向. 心理科学, 32(2), 316-319+323.
[3] 侯滔(2021). 任务厌恶对拖延行为的影响. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[4] 林飏(2013). 大一新生学业拖延的现状、成因及对策——以北京某高校大一新生为例. 北京教育学院学报(自然科学版), 8(4), 21-26.
[5] 单静波(2022). 大学生学业拖延现状、影响因素及干预. 硕士学位论文, 杭州: 浙江理工大学.
[6] 童廷婷, 白幼玲, 冯廷勇(2024). 情绪调节改善拖延行为的认知机制: 任务厌恶中介作用. 心理学报, 56(4), 458-468.
[7] 王俊宇(2022). 不同情绪调节策略影响拖延行为的神经基础. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[8] 徐俊业(2022). 完美主义影响拖延行为的认知神经机制. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[9] 杨雅琪(2021). 预期想象影响拖延行为的认知神经机制. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[10] 张顺民(2020). 拖延的时间决策模型及神经基础. 博士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[11] Li, Y. H., Liu, C. Y., Huo, Z. Z. et al. (2024). Task Aversiveness and Outcome Value Mediate the Relationship between Self-Control and Academic Procrastination among Primary School Students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39, 3029-3045.[CrossRef
[12] Steel, P. (2006). The Nature of Procrastination: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review of Quintessential Self-Regulatory Failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 65-94.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Zhang, S., Verguts, T., Zhang, C., Feng, P., Chen, Q., & Feng, T. (2021). Outcome Value and Task Aversiveness Impact Task Procrastination through Separate Neural Pathways. Cerebral Cortex, 31, 3846-3855.[CrossRef] [PubMed]