基于深度学习的滑坡目标检测模型对比研究
Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models for Landslide Object Detection
DOI: 10.12677/gser.2026.153048, PDF,   
作者: 郑智鹏:云南师范大学地理学部,云南 昆明
关键词: 滑坡检测目标检测YOLOv8YOLOv11RT-DETR深度学习Landslide Detection Object Detection YOLOv8 YOLOv11 RT-DETR Deep Learning
摘要: 针对滑坡目标识别中人工解译效率低、复杂场景下目标检测效果不稳定等问题,本文基于公开滑坡目标检测数据集,选取YOLOv8、YOLOv11和RT-DETR三种目标检测模型开展对比实验,对不同模型在滑坡识别任务中的性能进行分析。实验采用统一数据集和训练条件,从模型训练过程、验证集定量指标以及可视化检测结果三个方面进行评价。结果表明,三种模型均能够较好地完成滑坡目标检测任务,训练过程中损失函数整体下降,精确率(Precision, P)、召回率(Recall, R)和平均精度均值(mean Average Precision, mAP)等指标持续提升并趋于稳定,表现出较好的收敛性。其中,RT-DETR的综合检测性能最好,其Precision、Recall、mAP@0.5和mAP@0.5:0.95分别达到0.954、0.950、0.964和0.815,均优于YOLOv8和YOLOv11,说明其在滑坡目标识别和边界框定位方面具有更高精度。可视化结果进一步表明,RT-DETR的检测框完整性和稳定性最好,YOLOv11次之,YOLOv8在个别复杂场景下存在重复检测现象。研究表明,三种模型均适用于滑坡目标检测任务,其中RT-DETR更适合精度要求较高的场景,YOLOv11更适合兼顾检测效果与实时性的应用需求。
Abstract: To address the problems of low efficiency in manual interpretation and unstable detection performance in complex landslide scenes, this study conducted comparative experiments using three object detection models, namely YOLOv8, YOLOv11, and RT-DETR, based on a public landslide object detection dataset, and analyzed their performance in landslide recognition tasks. Under the same dataset and training conditions, the models were evaluated from three aspects: the training process, quantitative validation metrics, and visualization of detection results. The results show that all three models can effectively accomplish landslide object detection. During training, the loss functions generally decreased, while indicators such as Precision (P), Recall (R), and mean Average Precision (mAP) continuously improved and gradually stabilized, indicating good convergence. Among them, RT-DETR achieved the best overall detection performance, with Precision, Recall, mAP@0.5, and mAP@0.5:0.95 reaching 0.954, 0.950, 0.964, and 0.815, respectively, all higher than those of YOLOv8 and YOLOv11, demonstrating higher accuracy in landslide recognition and bounding box localization. The visualization results further show that RT-DETR achieved the best completeness and stability of detection boxes, followed by YOLOv11, while YOLOv8 showed repeated detections in some complex scenes. The study indicates that all three models are suitable for landslide object detection tasks. RT-DETR is more suitable for scenarios requiring higher accuracy, while YOLOv11 is more appropriate for applications that need to balance detection performance and real-time efficiency.
文章引用:郑智鹏. 基于深度学习的滑坡目标检测模型对比研究[J]. 地理科学研究, 2026, 15(3): 509-520. https://doi.org/10.12677/gser.2026.153048

参考文献

[1] 唐亚明, 张茂省, 薛强, 等. 滑坡监测预警国内外研究现状及评述[J]. 地质论评, 2012, 58(3): 533-541.
[2] 许强, 汤明高, 徐开祥, 等. 滑坡时空演化规律及预警预报研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008(6): 1104-1112.
[3] 李忠生. 国内外地震滑坡灾害研究综述[J]. 灾害学, 2003(4): 65-71.
[4] 葛大庆, 戴可人, 郭兆成, 等. 重大地质灾害隐患早期识别中综合遥感应用的思考与建议[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2019, 44(7): 949-956.
[5] 许强, 朱星, 李为乐, 等. “天-空-地”协同滑坡监测技术进展[J]. 测绘学报, 2022, 51(7): 1416-1436.
[6] 许强, 董秀军, 李为乐. 基于天-空-地一体化的重大地质灾害隐患早期识别与监测预警[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2019, 44(7): 957-966.
[7] 杨军, 兰婉婕. 多目标优化的遥感影像目标检测特征金字塔网络架构搜索方法[J/OL]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 1-21.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/23.1235.T.20260402.1452.002, 2026-04-23.
[8] 刘爽, 吕俊良, 秦宇航, 等. 基于YOLOv8的PCB缺陷检测改进算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(理学版), 2026, 64(2): 344-350.
[9] 李培辉, 伍红玲, 孙龙, 等. 融合YOLOv8与全局注意力机制的滑坡检测模型研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2026, 35(1): 81-91.
[10] Varghese, R. and M., S. (2024) YOLOv8: A Novel Object Detection Algorithm with Enhanced Performance and Robustness. 2024 International Conference on Advances in Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing Systems (ADICS), Chennai, 18-19 April 2024, 1-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Khanam, R. and Hussain, M. (2024) YOLOv11: An Overview of the Key Architectural Enhancements.
[12] Zhao, Y., Lv, W., Xu, S., Wei, J., Wang, G., Dang, Q., et al. (2024). DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-Time Object Detection. 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, 17-21 June 2024, 16965-16974.
[13] Han, K., Wang, Y., Chen, H., Chen, X., Guo, J., Liu, Z., et al. (2023) A Survey on Vision Transformer. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45, 87-110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 涂梨平, 陈美球, 冷鹏. 基于目标检测算法YOLOv9的滑坡隐患识别——以永新县为例[J]. 测绘通报, 2025(6): 37-42.
[15] Liu, Z., Mao, H., Wu, C.Y., Feichtenhofer, C., Darrell, T. and Xie, S. (2022) A ConvNet for the 2020s. 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, 18-24 June 2022, 11966-11976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 刘子煜, 刘金朝, 孙凯仪, 等. 基于Stable Diffusion和RepViT-YOLOv11模型的钢轨表面伤损检测方法[J/OL]. 铁道建筑, 2026: 1-11.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2027.u.20260402.0907.002, 2026-04-23.
[17] 孔誉霏, 张瑞菊, 庞蕾, 等. PM-YOLO: 多尺度融合的无人机小目标检测算法[J/OL]. 计算机工程与应用, 2026: 1-19.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2127.tp.20260328.1225.002, 2026-04-23.
[18] 郑文韬, 郑红, 孙玉泉, 等. 融合时序特征与运动引导的改进RT-DETR飞鸟检测方法[J/OL]. 计算机工程与应用, 2026: 1-12.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2127.tp.20260401.1545.006, 2026-04-23.
[19] 董绍江, 陈智雄, 夏浩然, 等. 基于改进RT-DETR的ROV机器人水下小目标检测方法[J/OL]. 计算机工程与应用, 2026: 1-13.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2127.tp.20260328.1536.012, 2026-04-23.
[20] 黎作鹏, 张少文, 刘佳祥, 等. 基于RT-DETR改进的航拍小目标检测算法[J]. 计算机工程与设计, 2026, 47(3): 879-887.