基于在线评分的新能源汽车推荐排序方法
Online Rating-Based Recommendation and Ranking Method for New Energy Vehicles
摘要: 针对当前新能源汽车推荐方法未充分考虑消费者购物心理、排序结果公平性不足的问题,本文融合电商平台的评分数据,引入前景理论计算消费者的心理损益值,代入博弈交叉效率排序模型,为平台提出一套新能源汽车推荐排序方法。选取汽车之家14款新能源汽车作为研究样本验证模型有效性,结果表明:本文方法相较于传统TOPSIS和均分排序结果,能够同时兼顾客观产品性能与消费者主观心理损益偏好,可为新能源汽车消费决策、平台高效推荐提供量化参考。
Abstract: To address the limitations of existing new energy vehicle (NEV) recommendation methods, including insufficient consideration of consumers’ purchasing psychology and inadequate fairness of ranking results, this paper integrates rating data from e-commerce platforms, adopts Prospect Theory to calculate consumers’ psychological gain and loss values, and incorporates the calculation results into the Game Cross Efficiency Ranking Model, to propose a systematic NEV recommendation and ranking method for e-commerce platforms. 14 NEV models from Autohome are selected as research samples to verify the effectiveness of the proposed model. The results show that compared with the traditional TOPSIS method and equal-weighted average ranking method, the method proposed in this paper can simultaneously take both objective product performance and consumers’ subjective psychological gain and loss preferences into account, which can provide quantitative references for NEV consumption decision-making and efficient recommendation operation of e-commerce platforms.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
中国经济网. 2025年新注册登记新能源汽车1293万辆[EB/OL]. 2026-01-27. http://www.ce.cn/xwzx/gnsz/gdxw/202601/t20260127_2731560.shtml, 2026-04-07.
|
|
[2]
|
张巧, 耿秀丽. 基于在线评论数据融合的产品排序研究[J/OL]. 智能计算机与应用, 1-9. 2026-04-07.[CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
徐畅, 赵萌, 孟鑫宇, 等. 考虑期望强度与属性补偿关系的新能源汽车在线推荐方法[J]. 管理学报, 2024, 21(7): 1056-1066.
|
|
[4]
|
盛志远, 沈超, 董丰, 等. 基于Kano-IPA模型的新能源汽车产品需求优先级排序方法[J]. 佳木斯大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 42(9): 61-65.
|
|
[5]
|
李宛哲, 李英. 考虑在线评论中个体标准差异的汽车产品排序方法[J]. 系统工程, 2021, 39(3): 143-152.
|
|
[6]
|
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
姜雨茹, 叶国菊, 刘尉. 基于前景理论的犹豫模糊TOPSIS多属性决策方法[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2026, 56(2): 42-55.
|
|
[8]
|
Sexton, T.R., Silkman, R.H. and Hogan, A.J. (1986) Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 32, 73-105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
Liang, L., Wu, J., Cook, W.D. and Zhu, J. (2008) The DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model and Its Nash Equilibrium. Operations Research, 56, 1278-1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|