区块链-AIGC融合的智能数据产权管理对财务绩效的影响——基于A股上市公司
The Impact of Intelligent Data Property Rights Management Integrated with Blockchain and AIGC on Financial Performance—Evidence from A-Share Listed Companies
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.158848, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘星雨*, 甘笑萱*:南京邮电大学管理学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 数据产权区块链AIGC智能系统企业绩效Data Property Rights Blockchain AIGC Intelligent System Corporate Performance
摘要: 数据要素市场化配置背景下,确权难、交易成本高、维权滞后等问题制约企业价值创造。区块链与AIGC融合构建的智能数据产权管理系统,为破解数据产权管理困境、提升运营效率与财务绩效提供了全新技术路径。为探讨智能数据产权管理对企业财务绩效的影响及内在机制,本研究选取2022~2024年中国A股182家制造业与互联网上市公司数据,采用熵权-TOPSIS方法测度系统效率,实证检验智能数据产权管理效率对企业财务绩效的作用效果与传导路径。研究结果表明:区块链-AIGC融合的智能数据产权管理效率显著提升企业财务绩效;机制检验发现,智能数据产权管理通过提升数据确权、流通与维权效率,进而改善企业财务绩效;异质性分析显示,该提升效应在大型企业中更为显著,对中小企业则更能促进创新绩效。本研究从技术融合视角拓展了数据产权管理与企业绩效的相关研究,从政府、企业层面为推动数据要素市场化配置与智能数据系统建设提供了经验启示。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the market-oriented allocation of data factors, difficulties in rights confirmation, high transaction costs, and delayed rights protection restrict corporate value creation. The intelligent data property rights management system built through the integration of blockchain and AIGC provides a new technological path to resolve the dilemmas in data property rights management and improve operational efficiency as well as financial performance. To explore the impact and internal mechanism of intelligent data property rights management on corporate financial performance, this paper selects data from 182 manufacturing and Internet listed companies in China's A-share market from 2022 to 2024, measures system efficiency using the entropy weight-TOPSIS method, and empirically tests the effect and transmission path of intelligent data property rights management efficiency on corporate financial performance. The results show that the efficiency of intelligent data property rights management integrated with blockchain and AIGC significantly improves corporate financial performance. Mechanism tests reveal that intelligent data property rights management enhances financial performance by improving the efficiency of data rights confirmation, circulation and rights protection. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that this promotion effect is more significant in large enterprises, while it can better boost innovation performance in small and medium-sized enterprises. From the perspective of technological integration, this paper expands the research on data property rights management and corporate performance, and provides empirical implications for promoting the market-oriented allocation of data factors and the construction of intelligent data systems at the government and enterprise levels.
文章引用:刘星雨, 甘笑萱. 区块链-AIGC融合的智能数据产权管理对财务绩效的影响——基于A股上市公司[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(8): 55-65. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.158848

参考文献

[1] 王会艳, 陈优, 谢家平. 数字赋能中国制造业供应链韧性机理研究[J]. 软科学, 2024, 38(3): 8-13.
[2] 张树山, 谷城. 供应链数字化与供应链韧性[J]. 财经研究, 2024, 50(7): 21-34.
[3] 黄勃, 李海彤, 刘俊岐, 等. 数字技术创新与中国企业高质量发展——来自企业数字专利的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(3): 97-115.
[4] Rauniyar, K., Wu, X., Gupta, S., Modgil, S. and Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B. (2023) Risk Management of Supply Chains in the Digital Transformation Era: Contribution and Challenges of Blockchain Technology. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123, 253-277.
https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-04-2021-0235
[5] 范合君, 潘宁宁. 数字化转型、敏捷响应度与企业韧性[J]. 经济管理, 2024, 46(7): 36-54.
[6] Teece, D.J. (2007) Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319-1350.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
[7] 陶锋, 朱盼, 邱楚芝, 等. 数字技术创新对企业市场价值的影响研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(5): 68-91.
[8] 赵霞, 许雅雯, 徐永锋. 数字化协同如何影响供应链韧性——基于资源和关系整合的分析[J]. 产经评论, 2023, 14(5): 24-42.
[9] 李晓梅, 刘姗姗. 数据要素赋能企业供应链韧性: 理论机制与实证检验[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2025, 42(5): 1-11.
[10] 巫强, 姚雨秀. 企业数字化转型与供应链配置: 集中化还是多元化[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(8): 99-117.
[11] 邵颖红, 周恺伦, 程与豪. 政府补助在激励企业“卡脖子”技术创新中能否提供助力——以企业参与内循环程度为调节变量[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(3): 84-92.
[12] 宫晓云, 权小锋, 刘希鹏. 供应链透明度与公司避税[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(11): 155-173.
[13] 江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5): 100-120.