图文转译:以迟子建小说跨媒介改编为例
Intersemiotic Translation: A Case Study of Cross-Media Adaptations of Chi Zijian’s Novels
摘要: 迟子建作为当代重要作家,其作品的影视化改编数量和相关学术研究却远少于同量级作家。这一现象源于其小说弱情节的散文化结构、多感官沉浸式的物性书写以及民族志式的集体记忆叙事,这些文本特质在向影像媒介转译时构成了一种抵抗,使迟子建小说跨媒介改编成为研究图文转译的典型样本。对《额尔古纳河右岸》《踏着月光的行板》《布基兰小站的腊八夜》三部小说影视化改编的探究表明,改编者须在情节取舍、人物视觉化呈现与意象影像转译之间做出策略性调适,而这些调适指向了文字与影像两种媒介在感官体验、叙事时间与符号表意维度上的异构性。在接受层面,受众从“静默读者”转变为“感官接收者”,民族记忆的精神厚度在转译中有所减弱。但图文转译的意义不应仅从“损耗”的角度来判定,更在于跨媒介转译过程中激发出的创造性转化与新的美学可能。这一认识有助于在理论上深化对跨媒介转译与图文关系的理解,也为探索文学作品的跨媒介改编提供可参照的视角。
Abstract: Although Chi Zijian is a contemporary Chinese writer of considerable stature, the number of screen adaptations of her work and related academic inquiries remains notably limited compared to her peers. This phenomenon is rooted in the textual specificities of her novels: a loose, essayistic narrative structure, a multi-sensory and immersive material writing, and an ethnographic narrative of collective memory. When transposed to the visual medium, these features constitute a form of resistance, making the cross-media adaptation of Chi Zijian’s novels a representative case for examining intersemiotic translation. An investigation into the screen adaptations of The Last Quarter of the Moon, Walking to the Moonlight Andante, and Laba Night at Bukilan Station shows that adapters must make strategic adjustments in plot selection, visual representation of characters, and the translation of imagery into visual signs. These adjustments point to the heterogeneity between textual and visual media in terms of sensory experience, narrative time, and symbolic signification. At the reception level, the audience shifts from “silent reader” to “sensory receiver,” and the spiritual depth of ethnic memory is weakened in the process of translation. However, the meaning of intersemiotic translation should not be judged solely from the perspective of “loss”; rather, it lies in the creative transformation and new aesthetic possibilities stimulated during cross-media translation. This understanding helps deepen theoretical insights into intersemiotic translation and word-image relations, and also offers a referential perspective for exploring cross-media adaptations of literary works.
文章引用:曾依柳. 图文转译:以迟子建小说跨媒介改编为例[J]. 艺术研究快报, 2026, 15(3): 436-444. https://doi.org/10.12677/arl.2026.153060

参考文献

[1] 苏童. 关于迟子建[J]. 当代作家评论, 2005(1): 55-56.
[2] 彭丹. 文学名著改编成电影为何“难”? 听戴锦华、双雪涛对谈文学与影像的转换[N]. 文汇报, 2026-04-25(3).
[3] 李秀红. 新时期的影像阐释与小说传播[M]. 成都: 四川大学出版社, 2007: 4.
[4] 戴锦华. 电影批评[M]. 第2版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2015: 3.
[5] (法)梅洛-庞蒂. 可见的与不可见的[M]. 罗国祥, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2016: 326.
[6] 迟子建. 额尔古纳河右岸[M]. 北京: 人民文学出版社, 2018: 16-17, 138.
[7] 迟子建. 踏着月光的行板[M]. 北京: 北京十月文艺出版社, 2004: 94, 131.
[8] 赵宪章. 语图叙事的在场与不在场[J]. 中国社会科学, 2013(8): 146-165+207-208.
[9] 刘明银. 改编: 从文学到影像的审美转换[M]. 北京: 中国电影出版社, 2008: 180.
[10] (美)德斯蒙德, (美)霍克斯. 改编的艺术从文学到电影[M]. 李升升, 译. 北京: 世界图书出版公司, 2015: 125.
[11] (加)马歇尔·麦克卢汉. 理解媒介: 论人的延伸[M]. 何道宽, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2019: 18.
[12] (法)柏格森. 时间与自由意志[M], 吴士栋, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2009: 89.
[13] 顾津荣. 论迟子建小说对“多民族文学”理念的实践[J]. 当代文坛, 2024(2): 124-130.
[14] (德)莱辛. 拉奥孔[M]. 朱光潜, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2016: 90.
[15] (德)沃尔夫冈·伊瑟尔. 阅读活动——审美反应理论[M]. 金元浦, 周宁, 译. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 1991: 43-44.
[16] 张小荣. 从“隐含作者”到“隐含读者”——论跨媒介叙事的意义生成及流转[J]. 世界电影, 2026(2): 107-115.
[17] 戴锦华. 电影批评: 理论的演武场[N]. 中国艺术报, 2011-08-05(4).
[18] 吕中慧. 迟子建小说接受研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东师范大学文学院, 2025: 49-51.
[19] 华中科技大学中国当代写作研究中心. 苍凉与诗意: 2016秋讲·迟子建 戴锦华卷[M]. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社, 2018: 165.
[20] 吴晓东. 李娟的意义——兼及《我的阿勒泰》电视剧改编中的“媒介间性” [J]. 文艺理论与批评, 2025(1): 95-106.