断层邻近倾斜煤层开挖回填与不回填围岩响应对比研究
Comparative Study on Surrounding Rock Response of Inclined Coal Seam Excavation with and without Backfilling near a Fault
摘要: 为比较断层邻近倾斜煤层开采中采空区回填对围岩响应的影响,建立含上盘、断层弱化带和下盘的三维数值模型,设置仅开挖不回填和边开挖边回填两种工况,模拟工作面沿x方向分步推进过程中垂向应力、垂向位移和塑性区的演化。工作面布置于上盘煤层内,由x = 190 m推进至x = 310 m,步距10 m,共推进12步;在第12步回填工况基础上,对围岩弹性模量、围岩黏聚力及抗拉强度、断层带强度参数和等效上覆荷载进行±20%单因素扰动。计算结果显示,在既定参数和及时回填假定下,回填体承担部分上覆荷载,采空区支承状态得到改善。第12步时,仅开挖工况最大下沉量为2936.85 mm,回填工况为64.16 mm,降低97.82%;塑性单元数由870个降至95个,降低89.08%;峰值垂向压应力由19.03 MPa增至25.65 MPa,反映回填体参与了荷载传递。三项响应指标对等效上覆荷载的敏感性均最高。模型参数取自现有FLAC3D建模文件,尚未通过现场岩样试验、RMR/Q分级和地应力实测进行独立反演;断层按弱化带处理,且未考虑断层面滑移、回填滞后、压实及渗流耦合作用。所得结果主要用于比较两种工况的相对差异和参数变化趋势,不宜直接作为具体矿井沉降量或破坏范围的定量预测。
Abstract: A three-dimensional numerical model containing the hanging wall, a weakened fault zone and the footwall was established to examine the influence of goaf backfilling on an inclined coal seam near a fault. Excavation without backfilling and excavation with immediate backfilling were simulated during a 12-step advance from x = 190 m to x = 310 m at a step length of 10 m. For the Step-12 backfill case, one-factor-at-a-time perturbations of ±20% were applied to the surrounding-rock elastic modulus, surrounding-rock cohesion and tensile strength, fault-zone strength parameters and equivalent overburden load. At Step 12, backfilling reduced the maximum subsidence from 2936.85 mm to 64.16 mm and the number of plastic elements from 870 to 95, while the peak vertical compressive stress increased from 19.03 MPa to 25.65 MPa as the backfill participated in load transfer. All three response indices were most sensitive to the equivalent overburden load. The mechanical parameters were adopted from the existing FLAC3D input files but were not independently calibrated using site-specific laboratory tests, RMR/Q classification or in-situ stress measurements. The results are therefore interpreted as relative responses and parameter trends rather than direct quantitative predictions for a specific mine.
文章引用:梁翱翔. 断层邻近倾斜煤层开挖回填与不回填围岩响应对比研究[J]. 矿山工程, 2026, 14(5): 1209-1221. https://doi.org/10.12677/me.2026.145119

参考文献

[1] 张奇, 宣以琼. 基于FLAC3D的断层对煤层回采的影响研究[J]. 湖北理工学院学报, 2024, 40(3): 66-70.
[2] 高志虎, 穆国虎, 高文东, 等. 断层不同盘位下缓倾斜煤层工作面覆岩破断与变形规律研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2025, 57(11): 141-149.
[3] 刘雨生, 孟祥瑞, 程详, 等. 逆断层上下盘开采扰动下断层活化响应模拟研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2024, 20(8): 33-41.
[4] 刘超. 采动影响下断层活化致围岩失稳破坏机理研究[J]. 陕西煤炭, 2025, 44(7): 20-25, 38.
[5] 张梦丽, 詹润. 厚松散层覆盖下逆冲断层倾角变化与采动活化响应模拟研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2023, 32(10): 173-180.
[6] 包苏东, 刘南, 付凯凯, 等. 深井大倾角仰采工作面过断层开采技术研究与应用[J]. 中国矿业, 2025, 34(S2): 328-333.
[7] 李浩然, 杨本水. 断层对煤层回采的影响模拟研究[J]. 四川轻化工大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 35(5): 87-94.
[8] 李先平. 不同因素影响下含断层构造倾斜煤层底板损伤及断层活化突水规律数值模拟研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2020.
[9] 柳群荣, 郭忠林, 陈青松, 等. 基于FLAC3D的分级尾砂充填治理采空区研究[J]. 矿冶, 2019, 28(1): 4-8.
[10] 唐礼忠, 周建雄, 张君, 等. 动力扰动下深部采空区围岩力学响应及充填作用效果[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 39(6): 623-628.
[11] 王海峰, 苏成哲, 李继红, 等. 基于FLAC3D对某铅锌矿巷道稳定性及采空区治理方案研究[J]. 甘肃冶金, 2024, 46(2): 1-4.
[12] 闫松林. 浅埋煤层条带膏体充填置换开采技术研究[J]. 能源与节能, 2026(1): 172-175.
[13] 王雁冰, 王健龙, 任文涛, 等. 复杂地质条件下连采连充式采煤防冲理论分析[J]. 工程科学学报, 2026, 48(3): 477-491.
[14] 姜永丰, 房祥龙, 海龙. 歪头山尾矿库下充填开采围岩稳定性分析[J]. 化工矿产地质, 2024, 46(4): 321-328.
[15] Zhang, P., Xu, Z., Deng, X., Zhang, Y. and Hu, X. (2026) Study on the Migration Laws of Overlying Strata in Backfill Mining of Close-Distance Coal Seams. Processes, 14, Article 1448.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14091448
[16] 吴亚萍, 胡友彪, 刘瑜, 等. 深部大型断层注浆改造及数值模拟分析[J]. 煤炭技术, 2017, 36(2): 35-37.
[17] 吴姗, 宋卫东, 杜建华, 等. 高陡边坡下充填法开采挂帮矿稳定性数值模拟与安全监测[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2013, 30(6): 874-879, 885.
[18] 钱鸣高, 缪协兴, 许家林. 岩层控制中的关键层理论研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 1996, 21(3): 225-230.