定向减资情形下失权股东对债权人责任承担的探析
An Analysis of the Liability of Shareholders Who Have Lost Their Rights to Creditors in Cases of Targeted Capital Reduction
摘要: 对失权股权的定向减资在实现公司股权优化的同时也对债权人利益的保护提出了新的挑战。与等比例减资不同,该减资方式往往只涉及部分股东出资义务的免除或资本返还,但也会对公司责任财产造成实质性减损,而且此种方式更易变相成为股东逃避出资损害债权人债权的工具。文章尝试探讨失权股权通过定向减资处置时,失权股东对公司债权人的责任承担问题。在具体责任认定上,需综合考量公司偿债能力、失权程序和减资程序的合法性等因素,排除控制股东恶意失权减资转嫁风险,明确失权股东以减资范围为限对公司不能清偿部分以承担补充责任为主,连带责任为辅,实现失权股东自由退出与债权人利益保护的平衡,促进公司健康发展。
Abstract: Targeted capital reduction for impaired equity rights, while optimizing corporate ownership structure, poses new challenges to creditor protection. Unlike proportional capital reduction, this approach typically only involves waiving contribution obligations or returning capital to certain shareholders, yet substantially diminishes the company’s liquid assets. Moreover, it can easily become a means for shareholders to evade capital contributions and harm creditors’ interests. This paper examines the liability of impaired shareholders toward creditors when impaired equity is disposed through targeted capital reduction. In determining specific liabilities, factors such as the company’s debt repayment capacity, the legality of impairment procedures and capital reduction processes must be comprehensively evaluated. This approach aims to prevent controlling shareholders from maliciously reducing capital to shift risks, clarifies that impaired shareholders should primarily assume supplementary liability—with joint liability playing a secondary role—for the portion of debts the company cannot repay within the scope of capital reduction, thereby balancing shareholders’ voluntary exit with creditor protection and fostering sustainable corporate development.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
中华人民共和国公司法[EB/OL]. http://gongbao.court.gov.cn/Details/c979401282004999d124f53b17ec32.html, 2026-08-20.
|
|
[2]
|
李建伟. 公司法学[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2024: 234.
|
|
[3]
|
最高人民法院民事审判第二庭. 最高人民法院关于公司法解释(三)、清算纪要理解与适用[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2016: 271.
|
|
[4]
|
最高人民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国公司法》若干问题的规定(三)[EB/OL]. http://gongbao.court.gov.cn/Details/3da4e92fb4866e5d5e86617a099b15.html, 2026-08-20.
|
|
[5]
|
朱慈蕴. 公司法理论、实践与改革[M]. 北京: 当代中国出版社, 2024: 180.
|
|
[6]
|
周友苏. 中国公司法[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2024: 166.
|
|
[7]
|
王毓莹. 新公司法二十四讲: 审判原理与疑难问题深度释解[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2024: 243.
|
|
[8]
|
[日]田中亘. 日本公司法[M]. 王万旭, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2025: 241.
|
|
[9]
|
刘凯. 控制股东的信义义务及违信责任[J]. 政法论坛, 2009, 27(2): 149-157.
|
|
[10]
|
曹慧敏, 陈汉文. 公司违法减资时股东对于债权人的责任[J]. 人民司法, 2023(31): 94-99.
|
|
[11]
|
吴可加, 刘乙璞. 股东失权制度的侵权风险规制与责任体系构建[EB/OL]. 人民司法杂志社. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/9po-fYTq5PG1TAT6vyNVgg, 2025-09-23.
|
|
[12]
|
国家法官学院, 最高人民法院司法案例研究院. 中国法院2025年度案例: 公司纠纷[M]. 北京: 中国法治出版社, 2025: 232-234.
|
|
[13]
|
张俊勇. 论公司法修订中减资制度的完善[J]. 法律适用, 2023(1): 88-94.
|
|
[14]
|
龚博. 新公司法对减资制度的改进及其适用[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 30(3): 77-87.
|
|
[15]
|
云闯. 新公司法司法实务与办案指引[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2024: 45-46.
|