黔东南州山地旅游气候舒适度分析
Analysis of Mountain Tourism Climatic Comfort in Qiandongnan Prefecture
摘要: 旅游气候舒适度是旅游活动适宜性的重要指标,本文基于2020~2024年黔东南州105处景点周边气象站观测资料,结合地形特征,深入分析黔东南州旅游气象舒适度的时空分布及景点视域特征,为全域旅游高质量发展提供科学支撑。结果表明:(1) 黔东南州全年旅游气象舒适度均处于I~III级,无IV、V级不舒适时段,旅游气候优势显著。(2) 空间分布上,全州旅游气象舒适度指数(Z)为5.58~6.17,均达II级舒适等级,中部、西部略优于东南部及北部边缘。雷公山“无夏型”、东南部“长夏暖冬”的气候特征共同打造黔东南特色“避暑核心区”与“避寒优势带”。(3) 海拔梯度分析表明,II级舒适区盛夏主要分布于827~1127 m中高海拔区域,寒冬集中于556~844 m中低海拔区域,寒冬总体舒适度略高于盛夏。(4) 黔东南景点视域空间连续性较低,呈现点状、带状、斑状及斑块状分布格局,高可视区集中于雷公山、云台山等西北部高海拔区域,东部、南部视域连续性强,片状特征明显。
Abstract: Tourism climatic comfort is an important indicator of the suitability of tourism activities. Based on meteorological station observational data from 105 scenic spots in Qiandongnan Prefecture (2020~2024), and taking into account the region’s topographic characteristics. Analysis of the spatiotemporal distribution and scenic-view-based characteristics of tourism meteorological comfort in Qiandongnan Prefecture. Provide scientific support for the high-quality development of integrated tourism. The results show that: (1) Throughout the year, tourism climatic comfort is at Level I to III. No uncomfortable periods of Level IV or V occur. This indicates a remarkable climatic advantage for tourism. (2) Spatially, the tourism meteorological comfort index (Z) ranges from 5.58 to 6.17 across the prefecture. All areas reach Level II (comfortable level). The central and western regions perform slightly better than the southeastern and northern marginal areas. The distinctive “no-summer” climate characteristic of Leigong Mountain, combined with the “long summer and warm winter” climate pattern of the southeastern region, collectively defines the unique “Summer Retreat Core Area” and “Winter Avoidance Advantage Zone” in Qiandongnan. (3) Altitude gradient analysis shows that the Level II comfort zone during mid-summer is primarily distributed across the mid-to high-elevation range (827~1127 m), whereas the winter comfort zone is concentrated in the mid-to low-elevation range (556~844 m); overall, the comfort level during winter is slightly higher than during mid-summer. (4) The spatial continuity of scenic viewsheds is relatively low. Their distributions show point-like, band-like, patch-like, and block-like patterns. High-visibility areas are concentrated in the northwestern high-altitude regions, such as Leigong Mountain and Yuntai Mountain. The eastern and southern parts have strong viewshed continuity, with distinct sheet-like features.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
殷浩然, 张平平, 董庆栋, 等. 基于海拔梯度的秦巴山地旅游气候适宜性评价[J]. 山地学报, 2021, 39(5): 710-721.
|
|
[2]
|
邓粒子, 保继刚. 中国避暑型与避寒型宜人气候的分布特征及差异[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(1): 41-52.
|
|
[3]
|
范立张, 解明恩, 肖瑞迪. 云南大理避暑旅游气候适宜性分析[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 46(5): 888-895.
|
|
[4]
|
蔡嘉仪, 李长顺, 杨晓燕, 等. 福建省避暑旅游气候条件及适宜性分析[J]. 海峡科学, 2022(7): 14-19.
|
|
[5]
|
李磊, 陶卓民, 陆林, 等. 贵州省避暑旅游流网络结构特征及其影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(11): 3208-3224.
|
|
[6]
|
庞红丽, 王子童, 陈丽英. 基于AHP和GIS的重庆市旅游用地生态敏感性评价及策略研究[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 2025(4): 37-41.
|
|
[7]
|
张潇潇. 大连金普新区旅游开发土地生态适宜性评价[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 阜新: 辽宁工程技术大学, 2017.
|
|
[8]
|
张娇. 基于GIS的宜兴竹海森林公园旅游开发生态适宜性评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京大学, 2016.
|
|
[9]
|
贵州省市场监督管理局. DB52/T 556-2024旅游气象舒适度标准[S/OL]. https://std.samr.gov.cn/db/search/stdDBDetailed?id=2BCF0383EF393101E06397BE0A0AD2B3, 2024-12-13.
|
|
[10]
|
国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 42074-2022气候季节划分[S/OL]. https://openstd.samr.gov.cn/bzgk/std/newGbInfo?hcno=2CC96F656DE7E1641FEA09766A87FDD3, 2022-10-14.
|