铺置方式对组合粒径石英砂支撑剂裂缝导流能力的影响
Effect of Placement Modes on Fracture Conductivity of Combined-Size Quartz Sand Proppants
DOI: 10.12677/jogt.2026.484060, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 梁梦珑*, 李子恒, 钱雅慧, 章 跃, 蒋 鑫:重庆科技大学石油与天然气工程学院,重庆;舒 煜:西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,四川 成都
关键词: 组合支撑剂;铺置方式;裂缝导流能力;石英砂;Combined Proppants; Placement Mode; Fracture Conductivity; Quartz Sands
摘要: 为明确不同铺置方式对组合支撑剂裂缝导流能力的影响,选取20/40目 + 30/50目、30/50目 + 40/70目和40/70目 + 70/140目3种石英砂组合,分别采用尾追式铺置与混合式铺置,在不同闭合压力条件下开展短期导流能力实验。结果表明,3种组合支撑剂的导流能力均随闭合压力升高而降低。20/40目 + 30/50目和40/70目 + 70/140目组合在混合式铺置条件下表现出较高的导流能力,且在高闭合压力下优势更明显;30/50目 + 40/70目组合的导流能力则呈现阶段性反应,不同闭合压力条件下两种铺置方式的导流能力存在差异。研究表明,组合支撑剂导流能力受粒径组合、铺置结构及闭合压力共同控制,其变化与颗粒堆积形成的孔隙结构及充填层承载稳定性相关。
Abstract: To clarify the effects of different proppant placement modes on fracture conductivity, three quartz sand combinations, namely 20/40 + 30/50 mesh, 30/50 + 40/70 mesh, and 40/70 + 70/140 mesh, were investigated. Short-term conductivity tests were conducted under different closure pressures using tail-in placement and mixed placement. The results show that the fracture conductivity of all three proppant combinations decreased with increasing closure pressure. For the 20/40 + 30/50 mesh and 40/70 + 70/140 mesh combinations, mixed placement yielded higher fracture conductivity than tail-in placement, with the advantage becoming more pronounced at high closure pressures. In contrast, the 30/50 + 40/70 mesh combination exhibited a stage-dependent response, with the relative conductivity performance of the two placement modes varying with closure pressure. The results indicate that the conductivity of combined proppants is jointly governed by particle-size combination, placement structure, and closure pressure, and is closely associated with the pore structure formed by particle packing and the load-bearing stability of the proppant pack.
文章引用:梁梦珑, 李子恒, 舒煜, 钱雅慧, 章跃, 蒋鑫. 铺置方式对组合粒径石英砂支撑剂裂缝导流能力的影响[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2026, 48(4): 566-574. https://doi.org/10.12677/jogt.2026.484060

参考文献

[1] 陈思源, 刘浩, 金衍, 等. 压裂支撑剂发展综述与展望[J]. 石油科学通报, 2023, 8(3): 330-346.
[2] 张学平, 刘友权, 张鹏飞, 周厚安. 大川中沙溪庙致密砂岩储层支撑裂缝导流能力的影响因素[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2024, 53(3): 92-97.
[3] 郭天魁, 吕明锟, 陈铭, 胥云, 翁定为, 曲占庆, 戴彩丽, 侯健, 刘晓强. 体积压裂多分支裂缝支撑剂运移规律[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(4): 832-844.
[4] Liu, Y., Mu, S., Guo, J., Chen, C. and Wang, S. (2021) Model for Fracture Conductivity Considering Particle Size Distribution in a Proppant Monolayer. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 95, Article ID: 104188.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104188
[5] 曹科学, 蒋建方, 郭亮, 王乐, 马凤, 安冬梅. 石英砂陶粒组合支撑剂导流能力实验研究[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2016, 38(5): 684-688.
[6] 朱海燕, 刘英君, 王向阳, 等. 考虑支撑剂颗粒破碎的页岩分支裂缝导流能力[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(1): 72-79.
[7] Liang, X., Zhou, F., Liang, T., Huang, Y., Wei, D. and Ma, S. (2020) The Effect of Combined Proppants upon the Fracture Conductivity in Tight Gas Reservoirs. Energy Reports, 6, 879-884.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.04.007
[8] Sun, H., He, B., Xu, H., Zhou, F., Zhang, M., Li, H., et al. (2022) Experimental Investigation on the Fracture Conductivity Behavior of Quartz Sand and Ceramic Mixed Proppants. ACS Omega, 7, 10243-10254.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c06828
[9] Wu, B., Xiao, F., Kong, M., Wang, B. and Zhang, S. (2022) Research on Proppant Optimization and Field Test of Ultra-Deep Tight Conglomerate Sandstone Reservoir. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, Article 891063.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.891063
[10] 杨亚东, 邹龙庆, 王一萱, 等. 川南深层页岩气藏压裂裂缝导流能力影响因素分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(5): 162-167.
[11] 国家能源局. SY/T 6302-2019压裂支撑剂导流能力测试方法[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2019.
[12] Wei, J.G., Zhou, X.F., Fu, X.F., Chen, Y.H. and Bu, F. (2021) Experimental Investigation of Long-Term Fracture Conductivity Filled with Quartz Sand: Mixing Proppants and Closing Pressure. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46, 32394-32402.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.083
[13] Wang, W., Zhou, D., Gu, T., Yan, Y., Yang, X. and Xu, S. (2025) Experimental Investigation on the Influence of Proppant Crushing on the Propped Fracture Conductivity. Processes, 13, Article 2166.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072166
[14] Tian, F., Jia, Y., Yang, L., Liu, X., Guo, X. and Martyushev, D.A. (2024) Experimental Study on Factors Affecting Fracture Conductivity. Processes, 12, Article 1465.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12071465
[15] Li, B. and Li, H. (2026) Morphology-Aware Experimental Evaluation of Proppant-Supported Fracture Conductivity and Surface Roughness Evolution in Tight Sandstone Fractures. Applied Sciences, 16, Article 6364.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16136364
[16] Liu, Y., Mu, S., Guo, J., Yang, X., Chen, C. and Liu, H. (2022) Analytical Model for Fracture Conductivity with Multiple Particle Sizes and Creep Deformation. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 102, Article ID: 104607.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104607