涉众型网络寻衅滋事罪的司法认定
Judicial Determination of the Crime of Seeking Trouble and Causing Trouble through Stakeholder Network
摘要: 涉众型网络寻衅滋事罪是传统寻衅滋事罪在网络场域衍生的新型犯罪形态,兼具网络空间的开放性以及涉众犯罪的规模化、危害性大等特征,已然成为网络空间治理的重心。相较于普通网络寻衅滋事行为,该类犯罪涉案主体较多、信息的传播速度更快并且伴随着线上线下危害的叠加,对网络公共秩序与现实中的社会秩序造成极大的危害。然而在司法实践中,本罪适用存在着诸多困境,就导致罪名“口袋化”适用问题突出,部分裁判违背罪刑法定与刑法谦抑性原则,对行为人的合法权利造成一定程度的损害。本文立足于网络空间秩序以及社会秩序,指出涉众型网络寻衅滋事罪的司法裁判争议焦点与认定难点,明晰此罪核心要件的实质判断标准,厘清层级化共犯归责边界与法定出罪事由,着力破解当前司法认定中的问题,为同类案件的审理提供理论参考与实践指引。
Abstract: The stakeholder-type network crime of provocation is a new type of crime derived from the traditional crime of provocation in the network field, which has the characteristics of openness of cyberspace and large-scale and great harm of stakeholder crimes, and has become the focus of cyberspace governance. Compared with the common network behavior of seeking trouble, this kind of crime involves more subjects, spreads information faster, and is accompanied by the superposition of online and offline hazards, which causes great harm to online public order and social order in reality. However, in judicial practice, there are many difficulties in the application of this crime, which leads to the prominent problem of “pocketing” the application of the crime. Some referees violate the principle of legality and modesty of criminal law, causing some damage to the legitimate rights of the actor. Based on the order of cyberspace and social order, this paper points out the focus and difficulties in the judicial judgment of the crime of seeking trouble through stakeholder network, clarifies the substantive judgment standard of the core elements of this crime, clarifies the boundary of hierarchical accomplice’s liability and the legal reasons for the crime, and tries to solve the problems in the current judicial determination, thus providing theoretical reference and practical guidance for the trial of similar cases.
文章引用:胡俊凯. 涉众型网络寻衅滋事罪的司法认定[J]. 争议解决, 2026, 12(10): 33-38. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2026.1210259

参考文献

[1] 苏晓宇. 网络空间寻衅滋事罪探析[J]. 廊坊师范学院学报(社会科学版), 2022, 38(2): 94-100.
[2] 沈晓白. 合宪性视角下网络寻衅滋事的刑法规制边界[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2024, 27(3): 158-166.
[3] 刘浩. 寻衅滋事罪口袋化的司法限缩路径[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(1): 162-172.
[4] 魏琪. 网络空间秩序的刑法规制——以编造、故意传播虚假信息罪的适用为中心[J]. 北京警察学院学报, 2023(3): 41-47.
[5] 王胜华, 周洲. 网络型寻衅滋事罪司法认定的现实考察与问题省思[J]. 湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 29(3): 71-81.
[6] 黄成. 网络造谣型寻衅滋事罪司法认定争议问题研究[J]. 太原理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 41(2): 51-58.
[7] 李光宇, 艾丹. 引导、参与网络舆论暴力行为的刑法评价[J]. 广西警察学院学报, 2024, 37(1): 84-95.
[8] 刘宪权, 王哲, 薛军, 等. 网络造谣、传谣行为构成寻衅滋事罪的认定——以张某国犯寻衅滋事罪一案为例展开[J]. 人民司法, 2021(28): 104-109.
[9] 陈兴良. 寻衅滋事罪的法教义学形象: 以起哄闹事为中心展开[J]. 中国法学, 2015(3): 265-283.
[10] 陈烨. 网络时代言论自由的法律边界及刑法规制[J]. 北京警察学院学报, 2020(2): 11-22.
[11] 张梦涛. 网络言论自由的法律规制研究[J]. 安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 39(2): 5-9.
[12] 王剑. 网络起哄闹事型寻衅滋事罪的争议与解决[J]. 池州学院学报, 2023, 37(2): 43-46.