敦煌盆地东部侏罗纪原型盆地探讨
Study on Jurassic Prototype of the Eastern Dunhuang Basin
DOI: 10.12677/JOGT.2017.396092, PDF,  被引量    科研立项经费支持
作者: 侯旭波, 王金铎, 刘国宏:中石化胜利油田分公司勘探开发研究院,山东 东营 ;刘卫彬:中国地质调查局油气资源调查中心,北京
关键词: 敦煌盆地侏罗纪原型盆地五墩凹陷沉积充填Dunhuang Basin Jurassic Prototype Basin Wudun Sag Sedimentary Filling
摘要: 以敦煌盆地东部各凹陷为研究对象,系统分析了侏罗纪盆地构造格架及沉积充填特征,恢复了其原型盆地。研究结果表明:侏罗纪之前,敦煌盆地与周边盆地具有相似的演化背景,至三叠纪末期,盆地“三山夹两坳”的构造背景初步形成;早侏罗世,敦煌盆地发生断陷,形成一系列彼此分割的小型凹陷,发育冲积扇–辫状河–湖沼相粗碎屑沉积;中侏罗世,湖盆范围进一步扩大,五墩凹陷发育半深湖–深湖相沉积,中–下侏罗统最大沉积厚度为1100 m,其他凹陷中–下侏罗统最大沉积厚度为600 m,以滨浅湖沉积为主;晚侏罗世时期,盆地发生整体拗陷,普遍接受上侏罗统沉积,充填了棕红色河流相砂砾岩沉积物。
Abstract: The Jurassic prototype of the Eastern Dunhuang Basin was studied from tectonic framework and sedimentary filling characteristics, and the prototype of the basin was restored. The results showed that evolution characteristics of Dunhuang Basin were similar to adjacent basins before Jurassic. The tectonic framework of “two depressions between three hills” was formed in the end of the Triassic. Dunhuang Basin was down faulted and formed a series of small sags in early Jurassic, which were separated from each other and filled with coarse clastic sediments of alluvial fan-braided river-limnetic facies. In the middle Jurassic, the lake basin spread more widely. In Wudun Sag, half-deep lake and deep lake facies were developed and maximum thickness of the Middle-Lower Jurassic strata was 1100 m. In contrast, in other sags shore shallow lake sedimentation system was mainly developed and maximum thickness of the Middle-Lower Jurassic strata was about 600 m. In late Jurassic, the Dunhuang Basin integrally sagged and was universally filled with brown-red sandy conglomerate of fluvial facies.
文章引用:侯旭波, 王金铎, 刘国宏, 刘卫彬. 敦煌盆地东部侏罗纪原型盆地探讨[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2017, 39(6): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.12677/JOGT.2017.396092

参考文献

[1] 杜旭东, 漆家福, 陆克政, 等. 大港探区中生代原型盆地恢复及成盆模式[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 1999, 7(3): 230-239.
[2] 杜旭东, 李洪革, 陆克政, 等. 华北地台东部及邻区中生代(J-K)原型盆地分布及成盆模式探讨[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1999, 26(4): 5-9.
[3] 谭明友. 渤海湾盆地东营–惠民凹陷孔店期原型盆地分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2003, 25(4): 348-352.
[4] 周小进, 杨帆. 中国南方新元古代–早古生代构造演化与盆地原型分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2007, 29(5): 10-15.
[5] 林中凯, 蔡利飘, 罗婷婷, 等. 敦煌盆地地层发育特征分析[J]. 内江科技, 2012(3): 149.
[6] 江平, 范小林. 敦煌盆地中、下侏罗统含油气系统分析[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2005, 30(2): 211-214.
[7] 赵澄林, 季汉成. 敦煌盆地群侏罗系石油地质研究[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2002.
[8] 陶宏洲, 王峰, 李爱武, 等. 敦煌盆地中侏罗统玄武岩与盆地演化关系浅析[J]. 吐哈油气, 2009, 14(1): 18-21.
[9] 张志诚, 郭召杰, 韩作振. 敦煌盆地中侏罗世火山岩的地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 1998, 34(1): 72-79.
[10] 郑孟林, 曹春潮, 李明杰, 等. 阿尔金断裂带东南缘含油气盆地群的形成演化[J]. 地质论评, 2003, 49(3): 277-284.
[11] 郭召杰, 张志诚. 阿尔金盆地群构造类型与演化[J]. 地质论证, 1998, 44(4): 357-363.
[12] 黄立功, 钟建华, 郭泽清, 等. 阿尔金造山带中、新生代的演化[J]. 地球学报, 2004, 25(3): 287-294.
[13] 张国栋, 王昌桂. 阿尔金走滑构造域沉积盆地特征[J]. 勘探家, 1997, 2(3): 17-20.