甘蓝型油菜耐盐相关性状的主成分分析及综合评价
Principal Component Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation on Salt Tolerance Related Traits in Brassica napus L.
DOI: 10.12677/BR.2018.72014, PDF,  被引量    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 胡丁雪, 吴道明, 游婧璨, 贺亚军, 钱 伟:西南大学农学与生物科技学院,重庆
关键词: 甘蓝型油菜耐盐性主成分分析综合评价Brassica napus L. Salt Tolerance Principal Component Analysis Comprehensive Evaluation
摘要: 目的:通过对种子萌芽期盐胁迫下甘蓝型油菜耐盐相关指标的研究,筛选和鉴定甘蓝型油菜耐盐种质资源。方法:通过浓度梯度实验对中双11号油菜种子萌芽期进行盐胁迫培养,测定种子的发芽率,确定最佳盐胁迫浓度为1.2% NaC1。在此浓度下,对88份不同遗传背景的甘蓝型油菜在盐胁迫处理下进行发芽试验,同时以去离子水为对照,播种后7天测定种子的发芽率、根长、整株鲜重和发芽势,以盐胁迫下各性状相对指数作为衡量耐盐性指标,利用主成分分析、隶属函数分析及聚类分析对其进行耐盐性综合评价。结果:在1.2% NaC1胁迫下,根长受盐胁迫影响程度最大,而发芽率受盐胁迫影响最小。各耐盐指标间的相关性分析表明,除了根长与发芽率之间无显著相关外,其他指标两两之间均存在显著正相关。通过对各耐盐指标进行主成分分析,最终确定各主成分贡献率及各指标对耐盐综合指标的贡献率。进一步应用隶属函数分析法对88个材料各主成分进行了综合评估并进行聚类分析,将88个基因型划分为高度耐盐、中度耐盐、不耐盐和盐敏感型4类,其中高度耐盐基因型有8个,中度耐盐21个,低度耐盐33个,盐敏感型26。根据综合评价结果,筛选出最耐盐品种为SW190。结论:可利用主成分分析、隶属函数分析和聚类分析对甘蓝型油菜种子萌芽期耐盐性进行分类和综合评价,筛选甘蓝型油菜耐盐种质。
Abstract: Objective: To identify and screen the salt tolerance resource in Brassica napus L., four indexes of salt tolerance related traits during seed germination stage were studied. Method: In this study, 1.2% NaCl was determined as the optimal salt stress concentration by the concentration gradient experiment on Zhongshuang 11. Subsequently, 88 Brassica napus varieties with different genetic background were evaluated for salt tolerance under the conditions of normal water supply and salt stress with 1.2% NaCl. Four indexes related to salt stress tolerance, including relative germination rate, relative root length, relative fresh weight and relative germination potential were measured. Principal component analysis, membership function value analysis and clustering analysis were used to evaluate the salt tolerance of 88 genotypes. Result: The results showed that salt stress has less influence on germination rate. However, it has larger influence on root length. By the principal component analysis on the four indexes, contribution rate of each principal component was obtained. The 88 materials were evaluated by membership function value analysis and for cluster analysis. Eighty-eight genotypes were clustered into 4 different levels of tolerance. 8, 21, 33 and 26 lines were classified as strong salt tolerant, medium tolerant, low tolerant and sensitive under salt stress during seed germination stage, respectively. Based on the results of comprehensive analysis, SW190 was determined to possess the strongest salt tolerance. Conclusion: It is feasible to comprehensively evaluate the salt tolerance of B. napus at the stage of seed germination by principal component analysis, membership function value analysis, and clustering analysis, which could be used to screen germplasm lines of B. napus for salt tolerance.
文章引用:胡丁雪, 吴道明, 游婧璨, 贺亚军, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜耐盐相关性状的主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 植物学研究, 2018, 7(2): 101-112. https://doi.org/10.12677/BR.2018.72014

参考文献

[1] Yong, H., Wang, C., Bancroft, I., Li, F., Wu, X., Kitashiba, H. and Nishio, T. (2015) Identification of a Gene Controlling Variation in the Salt Tolerance of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Planta, 242, 313-326.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Ruan, C.J., da Silva, J.A.T., Mopper, S., Qin, P. and Lutts, S. (2012) Halophyte Improvement for a Salinized World. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 29, 329-359.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Munns, R. and Tester, M. (2008) Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance. Plant Biology, 59, 651-681.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 陈兆波, 余健. 我国油菜生产形势分析及科研对策研究[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2010, 32(2): 303-308.
[5] Parida, A.K. and Das, A.B. (2005) Salt Tolerance and Salinity Effects on Plants. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe, 60, 324-349.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 王东明, 贾媛, 崔继哲. 盐胁迫对植物的影响及植物盐适应性研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(4): 124-128.
[7] 方先文, 汤陵华, 王艳平. 耐盐水稻种质资源的筛选[J]. 植物遗传资源学报. 2004, 5(3): 295-298.
[8] 王秀萍, 张国新, 鲁雪林, 吴新海, 刘雅辉, 曹彩霞. 棉花苗期耐盐性鉴定方法和鉴定指标研究[J]. 河北农业科学, 2011, 15(3): 8-11.
[9] 姜静涵, 关荣霞, 郭勇, 常汝镇, 邱丽娟. 大豆苗期耐盐性的简便鉴定方法[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(7): 1248-1256.
[10] 王萌萌, 姜奇彦, 胡正, 张辉, 樊守金, 冯沥, 张海玲.小麦品种资源耐盐性鉴定[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2012, 13(2): 189-194.
[11] 乔海龙, 沈会权, 陈健, 陶红, 臧慧, 栾海业, 张英虎, 陈和. 大麦种质耐盐性鉴定及评价[J]. 核农学报, 2015, 29(1): 153-160.
[12] 陈新军, 胡茂龙, 戚存扣, 浦惠明, 张洁夫, 高建芹, 傅寿仲. 不同甘蓝型油菜品种种子萌发耐盐能力研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2007(4): 26-27.
[13] 龙卫华, 浦惠明, 张洁夫, 戚存扣, 张学昆. 甘蓝型油菜发芽期的耐盐性筛选[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2013, 35(3): 271-275.
[14] 奚天雪, 杨磊, 袁玫, 李梦琦, 张景华, 周安琪, 高霞莉, 温洪宇. Nacl胁迫对甘蓝、白菜和油菜种子萌发的影响[J]. 种子, 2016, 35(6): 32-35.
[15] 顾东祥, 汤亮, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 基于图像分析方法的水稻根系形态特征指标的定量分析[J]. 作物学报, 2010(5): 810-817.
[16] Nasu, S., Kitashiba, H. and Nishio, T. (2012) “Na-No-Hana Project’’ for Recovery from the Tsunami Disaster by Producing Salinity-Tolerant Oilseed Rape Lines: Selection of Salinity-Tolerant Lines of Brassica Crops. Journal of Integrated Field Science, 9, 33-37.
[17] Munns, R. and James, R.A. (2003) Screening Methods for Salinity Tolerance: A Case Study with Tetraploid Wheat. Plant Soil, 253, 201-218.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 王德青, 朱建平, 谢邦昌. 主成分聚类分析有效性的思考[J]. 统计研究, 2012, 11(11): 84-87.
[19] 符明联, 李根泽, 杨清辉, 原小燕, 王敬乔. 隶属函数法鉴定油菜甘芥种间杂交后代的抗旱性[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2011, 33(4): 368-373.
[20] 王德青, 朱建平, 王洁丹. 基于自适应权重的函数型数据聚类方法研究[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2015, 1(1): 84-92.
[21] 黄镇, 杨瑞阁, 徐爱遐, 李建宏, 鲁瑞文, 罗鹏. 盐胁迫对3大类型油菜种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 38(7): 49-53.
[22] Marnville, J.W. and Baligar, B.V. (1993) Testing Crops for Salinity Tolerance. Proceeding of the Workshop on Adaptation of Plants to Soil Stresses, Lincoln, NE, l-4 August 1993, 234-247.
[23] Hamdy, A., Ab-dul-Dayem, S. and Abu-Zeid, M. (1993) Saline Water Management for Optimum Crop Production. Agricultural Water Management, 24, 189-203.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Ashraf, M. and Mcneilly, T. (2011) Salinity Tolerance in Brassica Oil Seeds. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 23, 157-174.
[25] 李春龙. 盐胁迫对油菜种子萌发的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(26): 11198-11199.
[26] 周广生, 梅方竹, 周竹青, 朱旭彤. 小麦不同品种耐湿性生理指标综合评价及其预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36(11): 1378-1382.
[27] 徐蕊, 王启柏, 张春庆, 吴承来. 玉米自交系抗旱性评价指标体系的建立[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(1): 72-84.
[28] 孙璐, 周宇飞, 汪澈, 肖木辑, 陶冶,许文娟, 黄瑞冬. 高粱品种萌发期耐盐性筛选与鉴定[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(9): 1714-1722.
[29] 白志英, 李存东, 孙红春, 赵金锋. 小麦代换系抗旱生理指标的主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(12): 4264-4272.
[30] 王贺正, 马均, 李旭毅, 李艳, 张荣萍, 刘慧远, 汪仁全. 水稻开花期抗旱性鉴定指标的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(11): 1485-1489.
[31] 祁旭升, 王兴荣, 许军, 张建平, 米君. 胡麻种质资源成株期抗旱性评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(15): 3076-3087.
[32] 孟庆立, 关周博, 冯佰利, 柴岩, 胡银岗. 谷子抗旱相关性状的主成分与模糊聚类分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(8): 2667-2675.
[33] 袁志发, 周静芋. 多元统计分析[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002.