不同树形对龙安柚光合特性和果实品质的影响
Effects of Different Tree Shapes on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Fruit Quality of Citrus grandis var. Longanyou
DOI: 10.12677/BR.2018.73039, PDF,    国家科技经费支持
作者: 张抗萍:南方山地园艺学教育部重点实验室/西南大学园艺园林学院,重庆;西南大学农学与生物科技学院,重庆;李荣飞, 夏清清, 何桥, 梁国鲁, 郭启高*:南方山地园艺学教育部重点实验室/西南大学园艺园林学院,重庆;易佑文, 苏理荣:广安区农业局,四川 广安;胡涛, 江学友:广安市科技开发培训中心,四川 广安
关键词: 龙安柚树形光合能力果实品质叶绿素含量Citrus grandis var. Longanyou Tree Shape Photosynthetic Capacity Fruit Quality Chlorophyll Content
摘要: 试验以龙安柚开心形、Y字形、双层分层形和自然圆头形4种树形为研究对象,测定各树形冠层不同部位的叶片光合特性及果实品质,并分析二者间的相关性。结果表明:1) 4种树形上部叶片的净光合速率(Pn)均高于下部叶片;一天中,Y字形不同部位叶片的Pn均高于其他树形,其次是开心形,说明Y字形和开心形光合能力较强。2) Y字形和开心形叶片的Chla、Chla/Chlb和SPAD含量均高于双层分层形与自然圆头形,而Chlb含量则相反;Car含量以开心形上部最高(0.61 mg∙g−1),Y字形上部次之(0.54 mg∙g−1),自然圆头形的叶片中含量最低。表明Y字形和开心形的捕光能力增强从而提高其光合效能。3) Y字形和开心形果实着色程度较好,单果重和可溶性固形物含量较高。开心形上下部Vc含量、总糖含量均较高,且可滴定酸(TA)较低。说明Y字形、开心形果实品质优于其他树形,且开心形冠层上部和下部的果实品质较为均一。4) Vc含量与Chla/Chlb (r = 0.838)和SPAD (r = 0.866)呈极显著正相关;Pn与果实转化糖及蔗糖含量、单果重、果形指数均呈极显著正相关,并与单果重的相关性系数最大(r = 0.712)。综上,龙安柚的Y字形、开心形冠层透光性好,叶绿素含量提高,树体叶片光合性能增强,有利于增加单果重,提高果实中糖和Vc含量,改善果皮色泽。
Abstract: Selecting reasonable tree structure can guarantee ventilation and light transmittance in the canopy, which is better for improving the rate of light utilization and high yield, quality or regular bearing. We used the open center shape, Y-shape, double layered shape and natural round shape of Citrus grandis var. Longanyou as the research object in this paper, and then photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality in different position of four kinds of canopy were measured and their relationships were analyzed. The results showed that: 1) The net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of the upper leaves of four kinds of canopy was higher than that of the lower leaves. The Pn of the leaves of different parts of the Y-shape was higher than that of the other canopies in the day, followed by the open center shape. It is indicated that the photosynthetic abilities of Y-shaped and open center shape were better than the other two. 2) The contents of Chla, Chla/Chlb and SPAD in Y-shaped and open center shape leaves were higher than those in the other two, while the Chlb content was opposite. The two canopies with higher level of carotenoid content were the upper part of open center shape (0.61 mg∙g−1) and Y-shape (0.54 mg∙g−1), and natural round shape was the lowest. It is indicated that the higher light-harvesting abilities of Y-shape and open center shape enhance its photosynthetic efficiency. 3) The direct reasons for high fruit quality of Y-shape and open center shape were that their fruit peel coloration, soluble solids content and fruit weight were better or higher than those in other two. Moreover, the contents of Vitamin C (Vc) and total sugar were higher, and the titratable acid (TA) was lower in the fruits of upper and lower parts of open center shape, which indicated that its fruit quality was uniform. 4) There was a significant positive correlation between Vc content and Chla/Chlb (r = 0.838) and SPAD (r = 0.866). The Pn was positively correlated with fruit sugar and sucrose content, fruit weight and fruit shape index, and the correlation coefficient with fruit weight was the highest (r = 0.712). In conclusion, Y-shaped and Open center shape have obvious advantages such as better ventilation and light transmittance ability, higher chlorophyll content etc., which could enhance the photosynthetic performance and be beneficial to increase the fruit weight and improve the fruit quality.
文章引用:张抗萍, 李荣飞, 夏清清, 何桥, 梁国鲁, 易佑文, 苏理荣, 胡涛, 江学友, 郭启高. 不同树形对龙安柚光合特性和果实品质的影响[J]. 植物学研究, 2018, 7(3): 305-317. https://doi.org/10.12677/BR.2018.73039

参考文献

[1] 熊爱民. 龙安柚高品质果生产技术[J]. 中国南方果树, 2012, 41(5): 83.
[2] 董然然, 安贵阳, 赵政阳, 等. 不同树形矮化自根砧苹果的冠内光照及其生长和产量比较[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(9): 1867-1873.
[3] Spann, T.M., Beede, R.H. and DeJong, T.M. (2009) Contributions of Short- and Long-Shoots to Yield of “Kerman” Pistachio (Pistacia vera L.). Scientia Horticulturae, 121, 495-500.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Lauri, P.É., Combe, F. and Brun, L. (2014) Regular Bearing in the Apple—Architectural Basis for an Early Diagnosis on the Young Tree. Scientia Horticulturae, 174, 10-16.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Duga, A.T., Ruysen, K., Dekeyser, D., et al. (2015) Spray Deposition Profiles in Pome Fruit Trees: Effects of Sprayer Design, Training System and Tree Canopy Characteristic. Crop Protection, 67, 200-213.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Zhang, J., Serra, S., Leisso, R.S., et al. (2016) Effect of Light microcLimate on the Quality of “d’Anjou” Pears in Mature Open-Centre Tree Architecture. Biosystems Engineering, 141, 1-11.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Widmer, A. and Krebs, C. (2000) Influence of Planting Density and Tree Form on Yield and Fruit Quality of “Golden Delicious” and “Royal Ala” Apples. International Symposium on Orchard and Plantation Systems, 557, 235-242.
[8] Dallabetta, N., Forno, F., Mattedi, L., et al. (2014) The Implication of Different Pruning Methods on Apple Training Systems. Poljoprivredai Sumarstvo, 60, 173.
[9] Gullo, G., Motisi, A., Zappia, R., et al. (2014) Rootstock and Fruit Canopy Position Affect Peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] (cv. Rich May) Plant Productivity and Fruit Sensorial and Nutritional Quality. Food Chemistry, 153, 234-242.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Almeras, T., Costes, E. and Salles, J.C. (2004) Identification of Biomechanical Factors Involved in Stem Shape Variability between Apricot Tree Varieties. Annals of Botany, 93, 455-468.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 冉辛拓, 宋海舟, 高志货, 等. 梨不同树形对光效能及产量品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2012, 39(5): 957-962.
[12] Lampinen, B.D., Tombesi, S., Metcalf, S.G., et al. (2013) Spur Behaviour in Almond Trees: Relationships between Previous Year Spur Leaf Area, Fruit Bearing and Mortality. Tree Physiology, 1, 700-706.
[13] 何凤梨, 王飞, 魏钦平, 等. 桃树冠层相对光照分布与果实产量品质关系的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(2): 502-507.
[14] 岳玉苓, 魏钦平, 张继祥, 等. 黄金梨棚架树体结构相对光照强度与果实品质的关系[J]. 园艺学报, 2008, 35(5): 625-630.
[15] He, F.L., Wang, F., Wei, Q.P., et al. (2008) Relationships between the Distribution of Relative Canopy Light Intensity and the Peach Yield and Quality. Agricultural Science in China, 7, 297-302.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 王建新, 牛自勉, 李志强, 等. 乔砧富士苹果不同冠形相对光照强度的差异及对果实品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2011(1): 8-14.
[17] 王小伟, 尚志华, 张强, 等. 樱桃透光和郁闭树冠相对光照强度及其果实品质和产量的差异[J]. 园艺学报, 2009(2): 157-162.
[18] Wang, S.Y., Chen, C.T. and Wang, C.Y. (2009) The Influence of Light and Maturity on Fruit Quality and Flavonoid Content of Red Raspberries. Food Chemistry, 112, 676-684.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 舒展, 张晓素, 陈娟, 等. 叶绿素含量测定的简化[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2010(4): 399-402.
[20] Zhou, J.Y., Sun, C.D., Zhang, L.L., et al. (2010) Preferential Accumulation of Orange-Colored Carotenoids in Ponkan (Citrus reticulata) Fruit Peel Following Postharvest Application of Ethylene or Ethephon. Scientia Horticulturae, 126, 229-235.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 傅秀敏. 红肉和白肉枇杷果实类胡萝卜素差异积累机制研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2013.
[22] Warren, C.R. and Adams, M.A. (2004) Evergreen Trees Do Not Maximize Instantaneous Photosynthesis. Trends in Plant Science, 9, 270-274.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] 许大全. 光合作用学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013.
[24] 范晓明, 袁德义, 杨斐翔, 等. 锥栗不同树体结构对光的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2015(22): 7426-7434.
[25] 张显川, 高照全, 付占方, 等. 苹果树形改造对树冠结构和冠层光合能力的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2007, 34(3): 537-542.
[26] 姜卫兵, 高光林, 俞开锦, 等. 水分胁迫对果树光合作用及同化代谢的影响研究进展[J]. 果树学报, 2002, 19(6): 416-420.
[27] 金孝芳, 贾尚智, 石亚亚, 等. 不同绿茶品种(系)光合特性及叶绿素含量的比较研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2013, 26(2): 520-523.
[28] 张晶楠, 张淑燕, 孙培琪, 等. 富士苹果垂柳形树冠光照参数与果实品质的关系[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010(4): 205-209.
[29] 王瑞, 陈永忠, 陈隆升, 等. 油茶叶片SPAD值与叶绿素含量的相关分析[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2013, 33(2): 77-80.
[30] 潘静, 曹兵, 万仲武. 两种果树叶片SPAD值与叶绿素含量相关性分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2012(5): 9-12.
[31] 刘西军, 陈静, 徐小牛, 等. 桂花叶片SPAD、叶绿素含量和比叶重特征[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2013, 40(1): 51-54.
[32] 周忆堂, 马红群, 梁丽娇, 等. 不同光照条件下长春花的光合作用和叶绿素荧光动力学特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41: 3589-3595.
[33] 王博轶, 冯玉龙. 生长环境光强对两种热带雨林树种幼苗光合作用的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(1): 23-30.
[34] 南鑫, 孙桂丽. 库尔勒香梨光合特性和果实品质研究进展[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2014(2): 1-4.
[35] 王琰. 苹果不同树形树冠特性及其对果实产量和品质的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2011.
[36] 张强, 魏钦平, 王小伟, 等. 乔砧富士苹果树冠枝梢数量和分布对产量与品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2010, 37(8): 1205-1212.
[37] González-Talice, J., Yuri, J.A. and Del Pozo, A. (2013) Relations among Pigments, Color and Phenolic Concentrations in the Peel of Two Gala Apple Strains According to Canopy Position and Light Environment. Scientia Horticulturae, 151, 83-89.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[38] 伍涛, 张绍铃, 吴俊, 等. “丰水”梨棚架与疏散分层冠层结构特点及产量品质的比较[J]. 园艺学报, 2008, 35(10): 1411-1418.
[39] 王志强, 牛良, 刘淑娥, 等. CO2施肥对大棚油桃光合作用及产量品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2001, 18(2): 75-79.
[40] 李丙智, 阮班录, 君广仁, 等. 改形对红富士苹果树体光合能力及果实品质的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 33(5): 119-122.
[41] 蔺经, 杨青松, 李晓刚, 等. 梨三主枝开心形对光合及果实品质的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2008(1): 20-24.
[42] 王瑜, 向青云, 吴亚维, 等. 贵州中部地区苹果的光合特性及其对产量和品质的影[J]. 园艺学报, 2010, 37(6): 984-990.
[43] Iglesias, D.J., Tadeo, F.R. and Legaz, F. (2001) In Vivo Sucrose Stimulation of Color Change in Citrus Fruit Epicarps: Interactions between Nutritional and Hormonal Signals. Physiologia Plantarum, 112, 238-224.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] 陶俊, 张上隆, 安新民, 等. 光照对柑桔果皮类胡萝卜素和色泽形成的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(11): 1833-1836.
[45] 江才伦, 彭良志, 曹立, 等. 不同修剪方式对柑橘产量、品质的影响及效益研究[J]. 果树学报, 2012, 29(6): 1017-1021.