我国刑法应当坚持实质解释立场

Criminal Law Should Adhere to the Position of Substantive Interpretation in China

摘要: 刑法的适用过程离不开法律解释，在刑法学的发展史上，出现了诸如文义解释、历史解释、逻辑解释、目的解释等多种解释方法，在法律的适用过程中，基于不同方法的功效不同，需要法律人基于一定的解释学立场来恰当的运用相应的解释方法解决法律和现实问题，在我国刑法学界不断探讨形式解释立场和实质解释立场的优劣。本文旨在从历史的发展、罪刑法定原则的要求、漏洞填补的需要、个案公正的需求等角度来论证实质解释的重要性，借以阐释我国刑法在实践中应当立足于实质解释立场这一观点。

Abstract: The application of criminal law cannot be separated from legal interpretation. In the history of the development of criminal law, there have been many kinds of interpretation methods, such as literal interpretation, historical interpretation, logical interpretation and purpose interpretation . In the application process of law, based on the different efficacy of different methods, it is necessary for the legal person to use appropriate interpretation methods to solve legal and practical problems on the basis of certain hermeneutic standpoint. In the field of criminal law in China , the advantages and disadvantages of the standpoint of formal interpretation and substantive interpretation are constantly discussed. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the importance of substantive interpretation from the perspectives of historical development, the requirement of the principle of legality of crime and punishment, the need to fill loopholes, and the need for case justice, so as to explain that the criminal law of our country should be based on the position of substantive interpretation in practice .