纳米诊断学的研究进展
Research Progress in Nanodiagnostics
DOI: 10.12677/ACRVM.2019.71001, PDF,   
作者: 韩建冬*, 额尔敦, 王美玲, 杜艳青, 梁凤英, 格根塔娜*:内蒙古医科大学,内蒙古 呼和浩特
关键词: 超声诊断临床 Ultrasound Diagnosis Clinical
摘要: 癌症已成为人类第二大死因。目前临床的问题是:肿瘤的诊断与预后分类是建立在临床症状与病理因素基础上,不足以反映肿瘤个体患者临床的全部动态过程,并不能够完全预测肿瘤诊断与治疗效果;临床绝大多数抗癌制剂仍不能区分癌细胞与正常细胞,结果导致了系统性的毒性与严重不良反应,纳米材料具有独特的声、光、电、热、磁和力学性能,为肿瘤的预警与个性化治疗带来了新的机遇。目前,基于纳米粒子的早期肿瘤标志物检测技术、活体动态多模式影像诊断技术、基于纳米粒子光热转换效应基础上的显像治疗一体化技术、纳米缓释药物与纳米药物递送器件已成为研究热点,并已取得了重大进展。纳米材料与微纳制造技术基础上的肿瘤诊断治疗技术,有望成为攻克肿瘤的有效手段。
Abstract: Cancer has become the second leading cause of death in humans. The current clinical problem is that the diagnosis and prognosis classification of tumors are based on clinical symptoms and pathological factors, which are not enough to reflect the clinical dynamics of individual tumor patients. It is not able to completely predict the diagnosis and treatment of tumors. Anticancer agents still cannot distinguish between cancer cells and normal cells, resulting in systemic toxicity and serious adverse reactions. Nanomaterials have unique acoustic, optical, electrical, thermal, magnetic and mechanical properties, which are early warning and personalized for tumors. Treatment brings new opportunities. At present, nanoparticle-based early tumor marker detection technology, in vivo dynamic multi-mode imaging diagnostic technology, imaging therapy integration technology based on nanoparticle photothermal conversion effect, nano sustained release drug and nano drug delivery device have become researches. Hot spots and significant progress has been made. Nano-materials and micro-nano manufacturing technology based on tumor diagnosis and treatment technology is expected to become an effective means to overcome tumors.
文章引用:韩建冬, 额尔敦, 王美玲, 杜艳青, 梁凤英, 格根塔娜. 纳米诊断学的研究进展[J]. 亚洲心脑血管病例研究, 2019, 7(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACRVM.2019.71001

参考文献

[1] Huda, W. (2002) Effective Doses to Adult and Pediatric Patients. Pediatric Radiology, 32, 272-279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Hollingsworth, C.L., Yoshizumi, T.T., Frush, D.P., et al. (2007) Pediatric Cardiac-Gated Angiography: Assessment of Radiation Dose. American Journal of Roentgenology, 189, 12-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Chapple, C.L., Willis, S. and Frame, J. (2002) Effective Dose in Pedi-atric Computed Tomography. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 47, 107-115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Brenner, D., Elliston, C., Hall, E. and Berdon, W. (2001) Esti-mated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT. American Journal of Roentgenology, 176, 289-296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] McCollough, C.H. and Zink, F.E. (1999) Performance Evaluation of a Multi-Slice CT sysTem. Medical Physics, 26, 2223-2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Mori, S., Nishizawa, K., Ohno, M. and Endo, M. (2006) Conversion Factor for CT Dosimetry to Assess Patient Dose Using a 256-Slice CT Scanner. The British Journal of Radiology, 79, 888-892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Mori, S., Endo, M., Nishizawa, K., Murase, K., Fujiwara, H. and Tanada, S. (2006) Comparison of Patient Doses in 256-Slice CT and 16-Slice CT Scanners. The British Journal of Radiology, 79, 56-61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Thomton, F.J., Paulson, E.K., Yoshizumi, T.T., Frush, D.P. and Nelson, R.C. (2003) Single versus Multidetector Row CT: Comparison of Radiation Doses and Dose Profiles. Academic Radi-ology, 10, 379-385.
[9] Berns, E.A., Hendrick, R.E. and Cutter, G.R. (2002) Performance Comparison of Full-Field Digital Mammography in Clinical Practice. Medical Physics, 29, 830-834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Fischbach, F., Ricke, J., Freund, T., et al. (2002) Flat Panel Digital Radi-ography Compared with Storage Phosphor Computed Radiography: Assessment of Dose versus Image Quality in Phantom Studies. Investigative Radiology, 37, 609-614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Kroft, L.J., Veldkamp, W.J., Mertens, B.J., Boot, M.V. and Geleijns, J. (2005) Comparison of Eight Different Digital Chest Radiography Systems: Variation in Detection of Simulated Chest Disease. American Journal of Roentgenology, 185, 339-346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Veldkamp, W.J., Kroft, L.J., Boot, M.V., Mertens, B.J. and Geleijns, J. (2006) Contrast Detail Evaluation and Dose Assessment of Eight Digital Chest Radiography Systems in Clinical Practice. European Radiology, 16, 333-341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Neofotistou, V., Tsapaki, V., Kottou, S., Schreiner-Karoussou, A. and Vano, E. (2005) Does Digital Imaging Decrease Patient Dose? A Pilot Study and Review of the Literature. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 117, 204-210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Samei, E., Lo, J.Y., Yoshizumi, T.T., et al. (2005) Comparative Scatter and Dose Performance of Slot-Scan and Full Field Digital Chest Radiography Systems. Radiology, 235, 940-949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Parker, M.S., Hui, F.K., Camacho, M.A., Chung, J.K., Broga, D.W. and Sethi, N.N. (2005) Female Breas Radiation Exposure during CT Pulmonary Angiography. American Journal of Roentgenology, 185, 1228-1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Hurwitz, L.M., Yoshizumi, T.T., Reiman, R.E., et al. (2006) Radiation Dose to the Female Breast from 16-MDCT Body Protocols. American Journal of Roentgenology, 186, 1718-1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Einstein, A.J., Henzlova, M.J. and Rajogopalan, S. (2007) Estimating Risk of Cancer Associated with Radiation Exposure from 64-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography. JAMA, 298, 317-323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Mukundan, S., Wang, P.I., Frush, D.P., et al. (2007) MOSFET Dosimetry for Radiation Dose Assessment of Bismuth Shielding of the Eye in Children. American Journal of Roentgenology, 188, 1648-1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Neufang, K.F., Zanella, F.E. and Ewen, K. (1987) Radiation Doses to the Eye Lenses in Computed Tomography of the Orbit and Petrous Bones. European Journal of Radiology, 7, 203-205.
[20] Hopper, K.D., Neuman, J.D., King, S.H. and Kunselman, A.R. (2001) Radioprotection to the Eye during CT Scanning. American Journal of Roentgenology, 22, 1194-1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Yeoman, L.J., Howarth, L., Britten, A., Cotterill, A. and Adam, E.J. (1992) Gantry Angulation in Brain CT: Dosage Implications, Effect on Posterior Fossa Artifacts, and Current International Practice. Radiology, 184, 113-116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Huda, W. and McCollough, C.H. (2008) CT of the Heart Radiation Dose Considerations. In: Schoepf, U.C., Ed., CT of the Heart, 2nd Edition, Humana, Totowa.
[23] Hurwitz, L.M., Yoshizumi, T.T., Goodman, P., et al. (2007) Effective Dose Determination Using an Anthropomorphic Phantom and Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor Technology for Clinical Adult Body Multidetector Array Computed Tomography Protocols. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 31, 544-549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Kusnezow, W., Jacob, A., Walijew, A., Diehl, F. and Hoheisel, J.D. (2003) Antibody Microarrays: An Evaluation of Production Parameters. Proteomics, 3, 254-264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]