概念框架体系的建构路径——建构策略与特点的《普通高等学校本科专业类教学质量国家标准》“三原则”解析视角
Approach to Constructing Systems of Conceptual Frameworks—Analysis of the Building Strategies and Their Features from the Perspective of the Three Fundamental Principles in the National Criteria for the Teaching Quality of BA Programs in China’s Universities and Colleges
摘要: 研究发现以知识告知型为主的教学和基于建构主义观、注重培养能力的教学,均无法解决碎片化知识的传授方式导致教学效果不佳的问题。要更好地掌握知识和培养能力,需接受知识是能力组成部分的学习观。基于这样的学习观,本项研究,作为系列课堂教学探索的最新实证研究,设计以“概念框架体系”建构学科知识体系的路径,采用“学生讲课为主的Jigsaw III教学模式”施教,以整合知识习得和能力培养,旨在探析用学习者的不同学习经历把以“肢解”形式表征和呈现的知识系统化的教学策略和其特点。基于中国教育部2018年1月首次发布的《普通高等学校本科专业类教学质量国家标准》(本文简称《国标》)所提出“突出学生中心、突出产出导向和突出持续改进”三个基本原则,分析定性为主的研究结果表明:“问题建构法”、“认知具化法”、“多维拓展法”和“显性强化法”的教学策略具有能力培养的高阶指向性,教学广度和深度的互促性,教学、管理和评估的整合性以及师生认知的共进性特点,有助于在学习社区中共建共享知识,通过把碎片化知识建构于概念框架体系中、这样有意义的教学过程培养能力。
Abstract: Previous research reveals that neither the “Knowledge-Telling” method nor constructivism-based practices are effective in meeting the problem, the unsatisfactory instructional outcomes caused by learning and teaching lesson content in isolated, discrete ways. In order to better acquire knowledge and achieve competence, we should accept that knowledge is part of competence. On the basis of such learning theory, this study, the latest of the series of empirical studies on class instruction, aims to elaborate on the major strategies and their features of the approach to the construction of the systematic knowledge of disciplines by building the conceptual framework systems of the curriculum, through the Jigsaw III Model to integrate the development of competence and acquisition of disciplinary knowledge, and to inquire into and analyze the use of students’ different learning experiences to systematize the knowledge represented and presented in “dismembered” forms. The analysis of the qualitative data, from the perspective of the three fundamental principles (i.e., students’ center, outcome-based center, and continuous quality improvement) established in the National Criteria for the Teaching Quality of BA Programs in China’s Universities and Colleges issued by China’s Ministry of Education in January, 2018 (the National Criteria, hereafter), indicates that the techniques, useful in implementing the Jigsaw III Model, include question-based knowledge building, visualization of cognitive processes, multi-dimensional extension of knowledge, and awareness-raising intensification. These strategies are characterized by development of higher order cognitive skills, synergetic effect of breadth and depth of curricular knowledge, integration of teaching, management, and assessment, and the teacher and learners’ joint effort and cognitive development, conducive to the promotion of the knowledge building and knowledge sharing in the learning community, through which to develop competence by building the fragmentary knowledge into the conceptual framework systems of the curriculum in meaningful ways.
文章引用:杨德生. 概念框架体系的建构路径——建构策略与特点的《普通高等学校本科专业类教学质量国家标准》“三原则”解析视角[J]. 教育进展, 2019, 9(2): 183-201. https://doi.org/10.12677/AE.2019.92033

参考文献

[1] 介绍《普通高等学校本科专业类教学质量国家标准》有关情况文字实录. 中华人民共和国教育部, 2018年1月30日发布. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/xw_fbh/moe_2069/ xwfbh_2018n/xwfb_20180130/201801/t20180130_325928.html
[2] 邓莉, 彭正梅. 面向未来的教学蓝图——美国《教学2030》述评[J]. 开放教育研究, 2017(1): 37-45.
[3] Katehi, L., Pearson, G. and Feder, M. (2009) Engineering in K-12 Education, Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 1-16.
[4] 管光海. 基于标准聚焦核心概念的STEM整合教育模式[J]. 开放教育研究, 2017(6): 87-93.
[5] 陈丽, 郑勤华, 林世员. “互联网+”时代中国开放大学的机遇与挑战[J]. 开放教育研究, 2017(1): 15-20.
[6] 陈娬. 知识建构教学的学习评价设计研究[J]. 开放教育研究, 2017(2): 55-63.
[7] 钟勇. 改变语言以改变大学语言课堂——众成语言课程(2.0课程)和与其相匹配的术语评估[J]. 澳门理工学报, 2015(4): 126-135.
[8] 杜文彬, 刘登辉. 走向卓越的STEM课程开放——2017美国STEM教育峰会述评[J]. 开放教育研究, 2018(2): 60-68.
[9] 李晓蕾. 教学认识论关于“知识价值与建构路径”观点的合理性[J]. 四川师范大学报(社会科学版), 2017(1): 84-90.
[10] 吴忭, 胡艺龄, 赵玥颖. 如何使用数据: 回归基于理解的深度学习测评——访国际知名学习科学专家戴维谢弗[J]. 开放教育研究, 2019(1): 4-12.
[11] 赵国庆, 张丹慧, 陈钱钱. 知识整合教学理论解读: 将碎片化知识转化为连贯性想法——访学习科学国际著名专家马西娅C林教授[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2018(1): 3-14, 30.
[12] Gardner, H. (2008) Five Minds for the Future. Harvard Business, Boston, 85-99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Jackson, N. 如何通过高等教育培养学生的创新能力[J]. 旷群, 译. 澳门理工学报, 2014(3): 131-142.
[14] Prensky, M. 数字土著数字移民[J]. 胡智标, 王凯, 译. 远程教育杂志, 2009(2): 48-50.
[15] Di Sessa, A.A. (2002) Why “Conceptual Ecology” Is a Good Idea. In: Limon, M. and Mason, L., Eds., Reconsidering Conceptual Change. Issues in Theory and Practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 29-60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Anndrea, O., Inga, G., Matthias, N. and Alexander, R. (2015) Helping Preservice Teachers with Inaccurate and Fragmentary Prior Knowledge to Acquire Conceptual Understanding of Psychological Principles. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 14, 5-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 王竹立. 新建构主义: 网络时代的学习理论[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2011(2): 11-18.
[18] 高媛, 黄真真, 李冀红, 黄荣怀. 智慧学习环境中的认知负荷问题[J]. 开放教育研究, 2017(1): 56-64.
[19] Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L. and Cocking, R.R. (2000) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experi-ence, and School. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 16-17, 31-35, 136.
[20] Orrill, C.H. and Eriksen Brown, R. (2012) Making Sense of Double Number Lines in Professional Development: Exploring Teachers’ Understandings of Proportional Relationships. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15, 381-403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 索耶Sawyer, R.K. 剑桥学习科学手册[M]. 徐小冬, 等, 译. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2010: 1-3.
[22] 王建华. 领域、学科之争与高等教育概念体系的建构[J]. 现代大学教育, 2006(2): 6-9, 21.
[23] 覃建雄. 民族旅游学概念框架、学科体系与发展建议[J]. 西南民族大学学报, 2011(12): 154-159.
[24] 刘继同. 人类灵性概念框架范围内容、结构层次与中国本土灵性社会工作服务体系构建[J]. 人文杂志, 2015(2): 110-115.
[25] 杨鑫, 解月光, 赵可云. 教育信息化背景下教研员知识体系的构建研究[J]. 电化教学研究, 2017, 294(10): 112-117.
[26] 郭玉英, 姚建欣, 张静. 整合与发展——科学课程中概念体系的建构及其学习进阶[J]. 课程教材教法, 2013(3): 44-49.
[27] 常绍舜. 从经典系统论到现代系统论[J]. 系统科学学报, 2011(3): 1-4.
[28] Prawat, R.S. (2000) Dewey Meets the “Mozart of Psychology” in Moscow: The Untold Story. American Education Research Journal, No. 3, 663-696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] 文秋芳. 评析“概念型教学法”的理论与实践[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2013(2): 1-6, 11.
[30] Kuhn, T. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[31] Murphy, G.L. and Medin, D.L. (1985) The Role of Theories in Conceptual Coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Lee, C.B. (2010) Generating Synergy between Conceptual Change and Knowledge Building. Human Development, 53, 134-152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Evans, V. and Green, M. (2006) Cognitive Linguistics. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah.
[34] Gunter, M.A., Estes, T.H. and Schwab, J. (2002) Instruction: A Models Approach. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 7.
[35] Simpson, T.L. (2002) Dare I Oppose Constructivist Theory. The Educational Forum, 66, 347-357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[36] 杨德生, 吴娱. “学生讲课为主的Jigsaw教学模式”的实证研究: 建构外语教学情景学习语境[J]. 澳门理工学报, 2008(3): 114-122.
[37] 周平红, 张屹, 杨乔柔, 等. 智慧教室中小学学生协同知识建构课堂话语分析——以小学生科学课程为例[J]. 电化教育研究, 2018(1): 20-28.
[38] 柴少明. 知识建构引领教育创新: 理论、实践与挑战——访国际知名学习科学专家波瑞特教授和斯卡德玛利亚教授[J]. 开放教育研究, 2017(8): 4-11.
[39] Ang, C.S., Zaphiris, P. and Wilson, S. (2011) A Case Study Analysis of a Constructionist Knowledge Building Community with Activity Theory. Behavior & Information Technology, 5, 537-554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[40] Hong, H.Y., Chang, Y.H. and Chai, C.S. (2014) Fostering a Collaborating and Creative Climate in a College Class through Idea-Centered Knowledge Building. Instructional Science, 42, 389-407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[41] Lee, H. (2016) Concept-Based Instruction: Imagistic and Meta-phorical Understanding of Phrasal Verbs. English Teaching, 4, 167-191.
[42] Garcia, P.N. (2017) Implementing Con-cept-Based Instruction in the Heritage Language Classroom: A Pedagogical Proposal. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages, 1, 1-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[43] 吴长城, 胡珊. 教师网络学习社区知识建构实证研究: 观点学习的视角[J]. 现代远距离教育, 2017(6): 57-65.
[44] 李海峰, 王炜. 面向问题解决的在线协作知识建构[J]. 电化教育研究, 2017(1): 36-41, 67.
[45] 许力生. 新编跨文化交际英语教程[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2013.
[46] 杨德生. 深化学科知识习得的道德思维培养路径研究[J]. 西南民族大学学报, 2017(7): 214-220.
[47] Curran, C. (1976) Counseling-Learning in Second Languages. Apple River Press, Apple River.
[48] Rassia, J.A. (1983) New Di-mensions in Language Training: The Dartmouth College Experiment. In: Oller, J.W. and Richard-Amato, P.A., Eds., Methods That Work: A Smorgasbord of Ideas for Language Teachers, Newbury House, Rowley, 363-374.
[49] 黄永红. 跨文化交际教程[M]. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社, 2010: 98-102.
[50] Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. and Waterhouse, F. (1999) Relations between Teachers’ Approaches to Teaching and Students’ Approaches to Learning. Higher Educa-tion, 37, 57-70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[51] Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Frost, E.J., Hill, W.H. and Krathwohl, D.R. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York.
[52] Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R. (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York.
[53] 杨德生, 石坚. 中美实时同步交互式课堂教学的探索与实践[J]. 中国外语教育, 2015(2): 23-28.
[54] 杨德生. 文化模式——概念修辞格下的思考[J]. 外国语文研究, 2015(1): 29-41.
[55] Kinchin, I.M. (2006) Concept Mapping, PowerPoint, and a Pedagogy of Access. Journal of Biological Education, 2, 79-83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[56] Novak, J.D. and Gowin, D.B. (1984) Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[57] Budd, J.W. (2004) Mind Maps as Classroom Exercises. The Journal of Economic Education, 35-46.
[58] West, C.K., Framer, J.A. and Wolf, P.M. (1991) Instruction De-sign—Implication from Cognitive Science. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights.
[59] Pressley, M. and Woloshyn, V. (2000) Cognitive Strategy Instruction That Really Improves Children’s Academic Performance. Brookline Books, Cam-bridge.
[60] 焦丽珍, 江丽君. 空间学习: 三维世界的“潜行者”[J]. 开放教育研究, 2011(3): 34-41.
[61] 何秋琳, 张立春. 视觉学习研究进展[J]. 开放教育研究, 2011(4): 23-33.
[62] 茹宁, 吴梦林. 超越“工作场”: 生活场所学习模式的兴起[J]. 开放教育研究, 2016(6): 119-126.
[63] 杨玉芹, 蔡永. 强健式学习研究新进展[J]. 开放教育研究, 2011(3): 22-33.
[64] Bruner, J.S., Goodnow, J.J. and Austin, G.A. (1956) A Study of Thinking. Wiley, New York.
[65] Bruner, J.S. (1960) The Process of Education. Vintage Books, New York.
[66] Gattgno, C. (1976) The Common Sense of Foreign Language Teaching. Educational Solutions, Inc., New York.
[67] Yang, D. and Wu, Y. (2010) Jigsaw III: Intercultural Pedagogy in a Chinese Classroom. BCIS of Pacific University and Amazon, 52.
[68] 石建壮, 李森. 论知识本质观的重建及其教育学意蕴——超越后现代的反思的现代性[J]. 教育学报, 2010(1): 20-29.
[69] 刘俊生, 余胜泉. 分布式认知研究述评[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2012(1): 92-97.
[70] Glaser, R. and Bassok, M. (1989) Learning Theory and the Study of Instruction. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 631-666.
[71] Conradty, C. and Bogner, F.X. (2012) Knowledge Presented in Concept Maps: Correlations with Conventional Cognitive Knowledge Tests. Educational Studies, 38, 341-354.
[72] 覃忠, 王玮, 王祎, 陆小华, 孙浩军. 整合思维理论及其教育意义[J]. 汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2010(6): 81-86.
[73] Williams, L., Abraham, L.B. and Negueruela-Azarola, E. (2013) Using Concept-Based Instruction in the L2 Classroom: Perspectives from Current and Future Language Teachers. Lan-guage Teaching Research, 17, 363-381.
[74] Schmidt, R.W. (1990) The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
[75] Schmidt, R. (1995) Consciousness and Foreign Language Learning: A Tutorial on Attention and Awareness in Learning. In: Schmidt, R., Ed., Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning, University of Hawaii, National Foreign Resources Center, Honolulu, 1-63.
[76] Fotos, S. (2002) Struc-tured-Based Interactive-Tasks for the EFL Grammar Learner. In: Hinkel, E. and Fotos, S., Eds., New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, 135-154.
[77] Chan, C.K.K. (2011) Bridging Research and Practice: Implementing and Sustaining Knowledge Building in Hong Kong Class-rooms. Computer-Supported Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 147-186.
[78] 何可抗. 灵活学习环境与学习能力发展——对美国《教育传播与技术研究手册》(第四版)的学习与思考之二[J]. 开放教育研究, 2017(1): 21-28.
[79] 蒋洪新, 简功友. 全人教育与个性学习——英语专业《国标》课程体系的研制与思考[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2017(6): 871-879.
[80] Posner, G.J. (2004) Analyzing the Curriculum. 3rd Edition, The McGraw Hill Companies, New York, 132-136.
[81] Borich, G.D. (2007) Effective Teaching Methods: Research-Based Practice. Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, 94-102.
[82] 卢丽虹. 高校英语教师对课堂教学评价标准的理解[J]. 开放教育研究, 2011(4): 79-83.
[83] 杨华, 文秋芳. 课堂即时形成性评估研究述评, 思考与建议[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2013(3): 33-38.
[84] Woolfolk, A. (2004) Educational Psychology. 9th Edition, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 52-53.
[85] 查尔斯瑞格鲁斯. 新教育范式的教学理论和技术[J]. 马姗姗, 顾小清, 译. 开放教育研究, 2016(6): 41-50.
[86] 陈光磊. 高校转型背景下教师的自我转型之路[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2017(9): 226-229.
[87] Kagan, S. (1994) Cooperative Learning. Kagan Publishing, San Clement.