川西二叠系火山机构地震特征及机理
Seismic Features and Mechanism of Permian Volcanic Institutions in Western Sichuan
摘要: 近年来钻井揭示川西地区龙潭组之下发育厚层火山岩碎屑岩地层,但火山机构平面特征及成因机理尚不明确。为刻画火山岩岩相分布,预测火山岩储层展布,理清分布规律,通过分析火山岩岩性及岩相,划分火山岩岩相类型,运用波形分类属性、波谷个数属性及古地貌恢复技术,对火山通道相、爆发相、喷溢相、火山–沉积相地震相特征进行识别,将火山机构平面相带划分为火山口、近火山口、近源及远源相带。探讨川西其他地区火山岩发育、地震相特征及发育背景,结果表明川西地区发育大面积火山岩沉积,其中近火山口爆发相内的火山碎屑岩为较好储层,是川西二叠系火山岩勘探的有利目标区。
Abstract: In recent years, drilling revealed that thick volcanic rock clastic rock strata developed under Longtan formation in western Sichuan Basin, but the plane features and genetic mechanism of volcanic mechanism are not clear. In order to characterize the volcanic facies distribution, predict the volcanic reservoir distribution, and clarify the distribution law, the volcanic lithology and petrofacies were analyzed to classify the types of volcanic lithofacies. The characteristics of volcanic channel facies, eruptive facies, flooding facies, volcano-sedimentary facies and seismic facies were identified by using waveform classification attribute, number of trough attribute and ancient landform recovery technology. The volcanic mechanism plane facies belt was divided into volcanic crater, near crater, near source and far source facies belt. Exploring the development of volcanic rocks in other areas of western Sichuan Basin, seismic phase characteristics and development background of volcanic rocks, the results show that a large area of volcanic deposits developed in western Sichuan Basin, the pyroclastic rocks in the eruptive facies near the crater are the better reservoirs, the Permian in western Sichuan Basin is a favorable target for volcanic exploration.
文章引用:闫亮, 董霞. 川西二叠系火山机构地震特征及机理[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2019, 9(4): 212-217. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2019.94024

参考文献

[1] 陈建文, 王德发, 张晓东. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷营城组火山岩相和火山机构分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2000, 7(4): 371-379.
[2] 李长山, 陈建文, 游俊, 等. 火山岩储层建模初探[J]. 地学前缘, 2000, 7(4): 381-389.
[3] 董冬, 杨申镳, 段智斌. 滨南油田下第三系复合火山相与火山岩油藏[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1988, 9(2): 355-376.
[4] 罗静兰, 曲志浩, 孙卫, 等. 风化店火山岩岩相、储集性与油气关系[J]. 石油学报, 1996, 17(1): 32-39.
[5] 孙希家, 张新涛, 华晓莉, 等. 火山发育区通道相类型、特征、成因及对油气的控制作用[J]. 地质论评, 2018, 4(11): 937-946.
[6] 王高文. 徐深气田火山岩岩性、岩相识别及有效储层分布规律[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2018, 37(5): 124-129.
[7] 高翔, 高有峰, 瞿雪姣, 等. 松辽盆地松科2井下白垩统营城组火山–沉积序列精细刻画[J]. 地学前缘, 2017, 24(1): 265-275.
[8] 徐正顺, 王渝明, 庞彦明, 等. 大庆徐深气田火山岩气藏储集层识别与评价[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2006, 33(5): 521-531.
[9] 罗富贵. 松辽盆地中南缘火山喷发作用及其岩石特征[J]. 世界地质, 2012, 31(2): 329-338.
[10] 蒋飞, 程日辉, 许中杰, 等. 火山岩冷却单元及其天然气成藏意义——以松辽盆地王府断陷为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(12): 2281-2291, 2324.
[11] 王璞琚, 迟元林, 刘万洙, 等. 松辽盆地火山岩相: 类型、特征和储层意义[J]. 吉林大学学报, 2003, 33(4): 449-456.
[12] 刘磊, 徐夕生. 大别造山带天柱山中酸性岩起源及地质意义[J]. 高校地质学报, 2011, 17(1): 136-150.