中美企业研发绩效比较研究
R&D Performance Comparison between Chinese and the United States Enterprises
DOI: 10.12677/MSE.2019.83031, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 窦文章, 陈 梦:北京大学软件与微电子学院,北京
关键词: 高科技企业研发投入强度绩效中美比较High-Tech Enterprises R&D Intensity Performance China-US Comparison
摘要: 经济全球化时代,研发创新成为企业应对竞争的重要方式。中国企业研发投入逐年增加,形成了一批重要研究成果,但是与美国相比仍有较大差距。本文在对中国和美国整体研发产出状况、企业研发投入在全球排名情况、企业自身研发管理现状等角度进行对比分析基础上,进一步对在研发创新方面具有代表性的高科技企业进行深入分析,得出美国高科技企业研发投入强度与企业总资产净利率呈负相关,且这种影响具有滞后性;中美两国高科技企业研发投入强度与企业营业收入增长率均具有正相关关系,且美国高科技企业中这种正相关关系更为明显;中国的高科技企业资产负债率和企业规模对企业的研发活动具有显著影响,而在美国高科技企业中,这种影响不显著;美国高科技企业行业分布较中国更集中,行业间的研发投入差异性也更大;中国高科技企业中,政府补贴能够提高研发投入强度对企业盈利能力的解释力度,最后本文提出了相关政策建议。
Abstract: Promoting the abilities of R&D and innovation for enterprises has become an important way to fight the competition crisis. The amount of high-tech enterprises in China spending in R&D investments increases year by year, however, there is still some pace with those in America. In this study, the comparisons are first conducted in R&D output, global ranking of R&D investment, R&D management of enterprises between China and America. Then, the representative high-tech en-terprises in R&D and innovation are chosen for in-depth analysis. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows. Firstly, remarkable negative relationship between the American high-tech enterprises R&D intensity and the return on assets is obtained, and there is a lag effect. Secondly, the R&D intensity has positive effect on the enterprise’ business income growth rate for high-tech enterprises both in China and America, and more obviously in America. Thirdly, the asset-liability ratio and firm size of Chinese high-tech enterprises have significant effects on enterprise’s R&D activities, but this effect is not significant for those in America. Fourthly, the industry distribution of American high-tech enterprise is more concentrated than that in China, and the differences be-tween R&D input scale in different industry are larger in America. Lastly, the Chinese government subsidies can promote the R&D activities of high-tech enterprises.
文章引用:窦文章, 陈梦. 中美企业研发绩效比较研究[J]. 管理科学与工程, 2019, 8(3): 248-263. https://doi.org/10.12677/MSE.2019.83031

参考文献

[1] 张凌, 胡未熹. 中国上市高科技企业资本结构影响因素研究[J]. 经济师, 2006(5): 80-82.
[2] 中国国家科学技术部. 高新技术企业认定管理办法(国科发火[2016]32号) [EB/OL]. http://www.most.gov.cn/tztg/201602/t20160204_123994.htm, 2016-01-29.
[3] 梁莱歆, 黄振豊, 吴振荣. 基于企业生命周期的中美高科技上市公司融资结构比较研究[J]. 管理现代化, 2005(1): 33-37.
[4] Schumpeter, J.A. (1943) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. McGraw-Hill, New York.
[5] Galbraith, J.K. (1952) American Capitalism. Miffin Press, Houghton, Nor-folk.
[6] Robert, P. and Marina, P. (1999) Overseas R & D and the Strategic Evolution of MNEs: Evidence from Laboratories in the UK. Research Policy, 28, 23-41.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Gassman, O. and von Zedtwitz, M. (2003) Trends and Determinants of Managing Virtual R & D Teams. R & D Management, 33, 243-262.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Asakawa, K. (2001) Evolving Headquarters-Subsidiary Dynamics in International R & D: The Case of Japanese Multinational Corporations. R & D Management, 31, 1-14.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Atuahene-Gima, K. and Ko, A. (2001) An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation Alignment on Product Innovation. Organization Science, 12, 54-74.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Kyriakopoulos, K. and Moorman, C. (2004) Tradeoffs in Marketing Exploitation and Exploration Strategies: The Overlooked Role of Market Orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 219-240.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Adegoke, O. (2007) Innovation Types and Innovation Management Practices in Service Companies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27, 564-587.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Santamaria, L., Jesus Nieto, M. and Barge-Gil, A. (2010) The Relevance of Different Open Innovation Strategies for R & D Performers. Cuadernos de Economia y Direccion de la Empresa, 13, 93-114.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Cruz-Cazares, C., Bayona-Saez, C. and Garcia-Marco, T. (2011) R & D Strategies and Firm Innovative Performance: A Panel Data Analysis. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14, 1013-1045.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 李宜静, 李新春, 王宣喻. 战略导向与组织绩效——技术创新的中介作用[J]. 经济管理, 2010, 32(5): 50-56.
[15] 郭研, 刘一博. 高新技术企业研发投入与研发绩效的实证分析——来自中关村的证据[J]. 经济科学, 2011(2): 117-128.
[16] 张永胜, 刘新梅, 王海珍. 研发市场职能整合与产品创新绩效关系研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2009, 27(2): 309-314.
[17] 张子健, 刘伟. 不同竞合模式下企业研发投资决策及绩效——基于不确定条件的分析[J]. 管理工程学报, 2010, 24(2): 104-110.
[18] 辛云峰. 研发支出、企业绩效与市场反应——基于中国中小企业板和创业板上市公司的实证研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 财政部财政科学研究所, 2012.
[19] 张近乐, 张坤. 创新网络活动对大中型企业研发绩效动态影响研究——基于VEC模型的实证分析[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2014, 35(1): 86-90.
[20] 韩亚峰, 樊秀峰, 周文博. R & D投入、技术外溢对高新技术企业研发绩效的影响——基于知识资本积累模型[J].财经论丛(浙江财经学院学报), 2015(8): 81-88.
[21] 彭灿, 杨玲. 技术能力、创新战略与创新绩效的关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2009, 30(2): 26-32+69.
[22] 宋浩亮. 战略导向、技术创新速度: 两者关系的实证研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2010, 31(10): 88-92.
[23] 宁宝超. 基于研发制度安排的企业研发绩效比较[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2011.
[24] 朱春玲. 我国企业经营管理者创新精神对创新成果影响的实证研究[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2011(4): 72-79.
[25] 李兵. 装备制造企业研发绩效管理研究[J]. 机电信息, 2012(2): 15-19.
[26] 李中, 周勤. 内生性约束下研发投入、研发效率与企业绩效——中国高技术产业细分行业的样本[J]. 软科学, 2012, 27(7): 11-14.
[27] 陈志军, 王晓静, 徐鹏. 集团研发管理机制与研发绩效关系研究[J]. 山东社会科学, 2013(12): 115-120.
[28] 王晓静. 企业集团研发协同与研发绩效的实证研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2012.