近海水下小型模块化反应堆技术选择调研分析
Investigation and Analysis of Technical Selection for Offshore Underwater Small Modular Reactor
摘要: 本研究旨在为未来10~20年近海水下高安全性和高经济性小型模块化反应堆的技术路线选择提供参考。从13个反应堆技术中筛选出5个反应堆,与采用常规布置设计的小型模块化压水堆进行了比较分析。按照同等条件下核动力装置的体积和重量从小到大依次为:基于俄罗斯SVBR-100技术的铅–铋快堆、新型有机盐冷却堆、革新超热沸水堆、基于LSBWR技术的沸水堆、一体化压水堆。此外,分析了三种动力循环特点:冷凝式SCO2动力循环、再压缩SCO2动力循环和紧凑型蒸汽朗肯循环。研究表明,与传统分散式压水堆相比,上述五种类型的反应堆及其安全系统和动力循环所需的总体布置尺寸相对较小;其中有机盐冷却堆和沸水堆的经济性较好。
Abstract: This work examines the most viable nuclear technology options for future underwater designs that would meet high safety standards as well as good economic potential, for construction in the future 10~20 years. The top five concepts selected from a survey of 13 nuclear technologies were compared to a small modular pressurized water reactor (PWR) designed with a conventional layout. In order of smallest to largest primary system size where the reactor and all safety systems are contained, the top five designs were: a lead-bismuth fast reactor based on the Russian SVBR-100, a novel organic cooled reactor, an innovative superheated water reactor, a boiling water reactor based on Toshiba’s LSBWR, and an integral PWR featuring compact steam generators. A similar study on potential attractive power cycles was also performed. A condensing and recompression supercritical CO2 cycle and a compact steam Rankine cycle were designed. It was found that the hull size required by the reactor, safety systems and power cycle can be significantly reduced with the top five designs compared to the conventional PWR. Based on the qualitative economic consideration, the organic cooled reactor and boiling water reactor designs are expected to be the most cost effective options.
文章引用:刘建阁, 陈刚, 汤青松, 王珏, 刘现星, 张晓辉. 近海水下小型模块化反应堆技术选择调研分析[J]. 核科学与技术, 2020, 8(3): 112-122. https://doi.org/10.12677/NST.2020.83013

参考文献

[1] Haratyk, G., Lecomte, C. and Briffod, F.X. (2014) Flexblue®: A Subsea and Transportable Small Modular Power Plant. Proceedings of ICAPP, Charlotte, 6-9 April 2014, 2368-2374.
[2] Shirvan, K., et al. (2016) Technology Selection for Offshore Underwater Small Modular Reactors. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 48, 1303-1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Yoshida, N., Kawakami, M., Hiraiwa, K. and Heki, H. (2002) Study on Long Life Core with Uranium Fuel for LSBWR. Proceedings of PHYSOR, Seoul, 7-10 October 2002, 1-11.
[4] Ko, Y.C. and Kazimi, M.S. (2010) Conceptual Design of an Annular-Fueled Superheat Boiling Water Reactor. MIT-ANP-TR-130, MIT, Cambridge.
[5] Toshinsky, G. and Petrochenko, V. (2012) Modular Lead-Bismuth Fast Reactors in Nuclear Power. Sustainability, 4, 2293-2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Shirvan, K., Ballinger, R., Buongiorno, J., Forsberg, C., Kazimi, M. and Todreas, N. (2014) Advanced Offshore Seabed Reactors. MIT-ANP-TR-155, MIT, Cambridge.
[7] International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2011) Status of Small and Medium Sized Reactor Designs.
[8] Buongiorno, J., Sterbentz, J.W. and MacDonald, P.E. (2006) Study of Solid Moderators for the Thermal-Spectrum Supercritical Water-Cooled Reactor. Nuclear Technology, 153, 282-303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Greaves, E.D., Furukawa, K., Sajo’-Bohus, L. and Barros, H. (2012) The Case for the Thorium Molten Salt Reactor. Latin American Symposium on Nuclear Physics and Applications, Vol. 1423, 453-460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Forsberg, C., Curtis, D., Stempien, J., MacDonald, R. and Peterson, P. (2014) Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactor (FHR) Commercial Basis and Commercialization Strategy. MIT-ANP-TR-153, MIT, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Hoffman, E.A., Yang, W.S. and Hill, R.N. (2006) Preliminary Core Design Studies for the Advanced Burner Reactor over a Wide Range of Conversion Ratios. ANL-AFCI-177, ANL, Chicago.
[12] Kunitomi, K., Katanishi, S., Takada, S., Takizuka, T. and Yan, X. (2004) Japan’s Future HTR—The GTHTR300. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 233, 309-327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Anzieu, P., Stainsby, R. and Mikityuk, K. (2009) Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor (GFR): Overview and Perspectives. Proceedings of the GIF Symposium, Paris, 9-10 September 2009, 127-134.
[14] Hejzlar, P., Todreas, N.E., Shwageraus, E., Nikiforova, A., Petroski, R. and Driscoll, M.J. (2009) Cross-Comparison of Fast Reactor Concepts with Various Coolants. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 239, 2672-2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Shirvan, K., Hejzlar, P. and Kazimi, M.S. (2012) The Design of a Compact Integral Medium Size PWR. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 243, 393-403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Cronje, J.M., Van Wyk, J.J. and Memmott, M.J. (2012) Overview of the Westinghouse Small Modular Reactor Building Layout. Proceedings of ICAPP 2012, Chicago, 24-28 June 2012, 75-82.
[17] Memmott, M.J. and Manera, A. (2014) The Use of a Flashing Drum to Generate Steam in the Integral, Inherently Safe (I2S) Light Water Reactor. Proceedings of ICAPP 2014, Charlotte, 6-9 April 2014, 60-70.
[18] Yang, Y.S., Kim, D.H., Bang, J.G., Kim, H.K., Chun, T.H., Kim, K.S., Song, K.W., Seo, C.G. and Chae, H.T. (2009) Irradiation Test of Dual-Cooled Annular Fuel Pellets. Proceedings of WRFPM/Top Fuel, Paris, 6-10 September 2009, 1271-1276.
[19] Pint, B.A., Terrani, K.A., Brady, M.P., Cheng, T. and Keiser, J.R. (2013) High Temperature Oxidation of Fuel Cladding Candidate Materials in Steamehydrogen Environments. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 440, 420-427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef