CAARC模型间距对缝隙流流场特性的影响
The Effect of CAARC Model Spacing on the Characteristics of Slit Flow
DOI: 10.12677/IJFD.2020.84008, PDF,   
作者: 莫玉凡:西南交通大学,风工程试验研究中心,四川 成都;西南交通大学,风工程四川省重点实验室,四川 成都
关键词: CAARC模型风洞试验湍流积分尺度湍流强度CAARC Model Wind Tunnel Test Turbulence Integral Scale Turbulence Intensity
摘要: 为了研究建筑物间距对流场特性的影响,本次试验采用两个缩尺比同为1:100的CAARC模型,通过改变两个CAARC模型的间距比,运用三维脉动风速仪测得了风速时程,进而得到了不同间距比和高度比下并列CAARC模型周围流场的湍流积分尺度和湍流强度。并对各个测点处的湍流强度和湍流积分尺度进行了分析。结果表明:测点4处的积分尺度随模型距比增大而减小,湍流强度随模型间距比增大而增大;测点1、测点2、测点3的积分尺度随模型间距比增大而增大,湍流度随模型间距比增大而减小。
Abstract: In order to study the influence of building spacing on the flow field characteristics, two CARRC mod-els with the same scale ratio of 1:100 were adopted in this experiment. By changing the spacing ra-tio of the two CARRC models, the wind speed time history can be obtained by utilizing the three-dimensional pulsating anemometer. Then, the turbulence integral scale and turbulence in-tensity of the flow field around the parallel CARRC model can be presented under different spacing ratio and height ratio. The turbulence intensity and turbulence integral scale at each measuring point were analyzed. Based on the experimental data, the following conclusion can be drawn: with the increase of model spacing ratio, the turbulence integral scale at measuring point 4 decreased and the turbulence intensity increased. Conversely, the turbulence integral scales at measuring point 1, measuring point 2 and measuring point 3 increased with the increase of model spacing ra-tio, and the turbulence intensity decreased with the increase of model spacing ratio.In order to study the influence of building spacing on the flow field characteristics, two CAARC mod-els with the same scale ratio of 1:100 were adopted in this experiment. By changing the spacing ra-tio of the two CAARC models, the wind speed time history can be obtained by utilizing the three-dimensional pulsating anemometer. Then, the turbulence integral scale and turbulence in-tensity of the flow field around the parallel CAARC model can be presented under different spacing ratio and height ratio. The turbulence intensity and turbulence integral scale at each measuring point were analyzed. Based on the experimental data, the following conclusion can be drawn: with the increase of model spacing ratio, the turbulence integral scale at measuring point 4 decreased and the turbulence intensity increased. Conversely, the turbulence integral scales at measuring point 1, measuring point 2 and measuring point 3 increased with the increase of model spacing ra-tio, and the turbulence intensity decreased with the increase of model spacing ratio.
文章引用:莫玉凡. CAARC模型间距对缝隙流流场特性的影响[J]. 流体动力学, 2020, 8(4): 71-79. https://doi.org/10.12677/IJFD.2020.84008

参考文献

[1] 陈素琴, 顾明, 黄自萍. 两并列方柱绕流相互干扰的数值研究[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2000, 21(2): 24-39.
[2] 盛奇伟. 并列放置双方柱扰流问题的大涡模拟研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 同济大学, 2007.
[3] 饶勇, 倪玉山, 刘超峰. 并列双方柱绕流的Lattice Boltzmann模拟分析[J]. 应用力学学报, 2008(2): 192-197+352.
[4] 马金英. 用格子Boltzmann方法模拟棱柱绕流问题[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2009.
[5] 吴倩云, 孙亚松, 刘小兵. 并列双方柱气动特性的干扰效应研究[J]. 工程力学, 2020, 37(S1): 265-269.
[6] 韩宁, 顾明. 两并列方形高层建筑局部风压干扰特性[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(10): 1441-1446.
[7] Karthik, S.K.K. and Kumaraswamidhas, L.A. (2016) Investigation on Cross Flow Characteristics over Side-by-Side Square Cylinders at Dif-ferent Spacing Conditions. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55, 1053-1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Yen, S.C. and Liu, J.H. (2011) Wake Flow behind Two Side-by-Side Square Cylinders. International Journal of Heat & Fluid Flow, 32, 41-51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 王小华, 何钟怡. 二并列方柱绕流的大涡模拟[J]. 哈尔滨建筑大学学报, 2002, 35(2): 49-53.
[10] 魏英杰, 朱蒙生, 何钟怡. 并列双方柱绕流的大涡模拟及频谱分析[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2004, 25(8): 824-830.
[11] 赵小军, 魏文礼. 并排方柱绕流的大涡数值模拟及显示[J]. 西安理工大学学报, 2012, 28(4): 469-473.
[12] 谢壮宁, 顾明, 倪振华. 三并列方柱风荷载特性的试验研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2003, 37(3): 290-293.
[13] JGJ/T338-2014. 建筑工程风洞试验方法标准[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2014.
[14] Flay, R.G.J. and Stevenson, D.C. (1988) Integral Length Scales in Strong Winds below 20 m. Advances in Wind Engineering, 28, 21-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 庞加斌, 葛耀君, 陆烨. 大气边界层湍流积分尺度的分析方法[J]. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版, 2002, 30(5): 622-626.