白洋淀地区土壤动物群落结构和多样性
Community Structure and Diversity of Soil Animals in the Baiyangdian Area, Hebei
DOI: 10.12677/HJSS.2021.91001, PDF,  被引量    科研立项经费支持
作者: 葛雪迎, 高思佳, 张钰博, 刘 僮, 刘浩宇*：河北大学生命科学与绿色发展研究院生命科学学院，河北 保定
关键词: 白洋淀；土壤动物；群落组成；生物多样性；Baiyangdian Area； Soil Fauna； Community Structure； Biodiversity
摘要: 基于2018年5~9月在白洋淀地区5类样地中土壤动物调查数据，研究其群落结构和多样性特点。5次调查共分离获得土壤动物1601头，隶属于3门10纲18目。优势类群为膜翅目(67.02%)，常见类群中较丰富类群依次为柄眼目(8.31%)、鞘翅目(6.18%)和中腹足目(4.31%)。土壤动物的整体数量按照季节表现为8月 > 9月 > 6月 > 7月 > 5月，按照土层表现为第1层(691) > 第2层(470) > 第3层(440)。不同季节间动物群落Jaccard相似性指数均高于0.5，6月相对其它月份Shannon-Wiener多样性指数最高，8月的Simpson优势度指数和Pielou均匀度指数显著不同于其它月份，不同样地间指数均不存在显著性差异(P > 0.05)。结果表明：白洋淀土壤中存着大量的动物类群，种群数量随土层加深而减少；不同季节土壤动物结构存在差异，呈现为极相似性和中度相似性；不同样地间土壤动物结构表现为中度不相似性、中度相似性和极度相似性。研究结果可为白洋淀土地利用及科学管理提供理论依据。
Abstract: From May to September, 2018, the project team studied the soil animal community structure and diversity in five types of land in Baiyangdian Area. A total of 1601 soil animals were obtained from 5 surveys, belonging to 3 phylum, 10 classes, 18 orders. The dominant species was Hymenoptera (67.02%), and the richer group in the common group was Stylomatophora (8.31%), Coleoptera (6.18%) and Mesogastropoda (4.31%). The total number of soil animals was shown as August > September > June > July > May, and it was shown as layer 1 (691) > layer 2 (470) > layer 3 (440) according to the soil layer. The Jaccard similarity index of animal communities in different seasons was higher than 0.5. In June, the Shannon-Wiener diversity index was the highest relative to other months. In August, Simpson dominance index and Pielou evenness index were significantly different from other months, and there is no significant difference between indexes in different places (P > 0.05). The results showed that there were a large number of animal groups in the soil of Baiyangdian Area, and the number of population decreased with the deepening of soil layer. The structure of soil animals in different seasons was different, but showed extremely and moderate similar levels. There are also differences in soil animal structures between different areas, and they are moderately non-similar to extremely similar levels. The results can provide theoretical basis for land use and scientific management in Baiyangdian Area.
文章引用：葛雪迎, 高思佳, 张钰博, 刘僮, 刘浩宇. 白洋淀地区土壤动物群落结构和多样性[J]. 土壤科学, 2021, 9(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJSS.2021.91001

参考文献

[1] Decaëns, T. (2010) Macroecological Patterns in Soil Communities. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 19, 287-302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Powell, J.R., Craven, D. and Eisenhauer, N. (2014) Recent Trends and Future Strategies in Soil Ecological Research-Integrative Approaches at Pedobiologia. Pedobiologia, 57, 1-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Decaënsa, T., Gioia, C., Measey, G.J., et al. (2006) The Values of Soil Animals for Conservation Biology. European Journal of Soil Biology, 42, S23-S38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] 潘开文, 张林, 邵元虎, 等. 中国土壤动物多样性监测: 探知土壤中的奥秘[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(11): 1234-1239.
[5] Ruiter, P.C.D., Neutel, A.M. and Moore, J.C. (1998) Biodiversity in Soil Ecosystems: The Role of Energy Flow and Community Stability. Applied Soil Ecology, 10, 217-228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Fu, S.L., Zou, X.M. and Coleman, D. (2009) Highlights and Perspectives of Soil Biology and Ecology Research in China. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 41, 868-876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] 傅声雷. 土壤生物多样性的研究概况与发展趋势[J]. 生物多样性, 2007, 15(2): 109-115.
[8] 中共河北省委、省人民政府. 河北雄安新区规划纲要[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2018.
[9] 中共中央、国务院. 关于对《河北雄安新区规划纲要》的批复[N]. 人民日报, 第001版, 2018-04-21.
[10] 尹文英. 中国土壤动物检索图鉴[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998.
[11] 袁锋. 昆虫分类学(第二版) [M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[12] 傅必谦, 陈卫, 董晓晖, 等. 北京松山四种大型土壤动物群落组成和结构[J]. 生态学报, 2002, 22(2): 215-223.
[13] Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W. (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Uni-versity of Illinois Press, Urbanna.
[14] Simpson, E.H. (1949) Measurement of Diversity. Nature, 163, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Pielou, E.C. (1985) Mathematical Ecology. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
[16] Jaccard, P. (1912) The Distribution of the Flora of the Alpine Zone. New Phytologist, 11, 37-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] 陈国孝, 宋大祥. 暖温带北京小龙门林区土壤动物的研究[J]. 生物多样性, 2000, 8(1): 88-94.
[18] 安哲. 河北清西陵地区土壤动物群落多样性研究[J]. 河北林果研究, 2008, 23(2): 150-152.
[19] 靳亚丽, 李必成, 耿龙, 等. 上海大金山岛不同植被类型下土壤动物群落多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(3): 304-311.
[20] Gibb, H. and Hochuli, D.F. (2002) Habitat Fragmentation in an Urban Envi-ronment: Large and Small Fragments Support Different Arthropod Assemblages. Biological Conservation, 106, 91-100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] 莫畏, 王志良, 李猷, 等. 北京近郊深土层动物群落结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(3): 248-257.
[22] 廖崇惠, 李健雄, 杨悦屏, 等. 海南尖峰岭热带林土壤动物群落——群落的组成及其特征[J]. 生态学报, 2002, 22(11): 1866-1872.
[23] 李伟, 崔丽娟, 赵欣胜, 等. 太湖岸带湿地土壤动物群落结构与多样性[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(4): 944-955.
[24] 宋英石, 李晓文, 李锋, 等. 北京市奥林匹克公园不同地表类型对土壤动物多样性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(4): 1130-1136.
[25] 黄旭, 文维全, 张健, 等. 川西高山典型自然植被土壤动物多样性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(1): 181-190.

为你推荐