地层厚度校正地震属性值方法研究及应用
Research and Application of Method for Correcting Seismic Attribute Values of Formation Thickness
DOI: 10.12677/JOGT.2021.433034, PDF,   
作者: 罗 兵:中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司第五采油厂,黑龙江 大庆
关键词: 地震属性地层厚度河道储层预测地震属性值校正Seismic Attribute Formation Thickness River Reservoir Prediction Seismic Attribute Value Correction
摘要: 针对地震属性预测河道砂体受地层厚度影响大、沉积砂体描述精度低的问题,开展了地层厚度与河道砂体地震响应特征之间的关系研究,研究了地层厚度校正地震属性值的属性校正方法,降低了地层厚度对河道砂体预测的干扰,提高了河道砂体的预测精度。利用该方法研究区井震结合储层预测精度由过去的73.7%提高到86.2%,利用该技术指导研究区措施方案调整86井次,累计增油1.8万吨,取得较好的开发效果。该方法对指导储层预测精度具有较好的指导意义。
Abstract: In view of seismic properties, it is predicted that the river sand body is greatly affected by the formation thickness and the low precision of sedimentary sand body description. Aiming at this problem, the relationship between the thickness of the stratum and the seismic response characteristics of the channel sand body is studied. The attribute correction method for correcting seismic attribute values of formation thickness is studied. This method reduces the interference of formation thickness on river channel sand prediction. This method improves the prediction accuracy of the river sand body. Using this method to study the accuracy of reservoir-seismic combined reservoir prediction from the past 73.7% to 86.2%. The research results guide the adjustment of the measures in the study area to 86 wells. Applying this result, the cumulative oil increase is 18,000 tons. This method can improve the development of oil fields. This method has a good guiding significance for reservoir prediction accuracy.
文章引用:罗兵. 地层厚度校正地震属性值方法研究及应用[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2021, 43(3): 79-86. https://doi.org/10.12677/JOGT.2021.433034

参考文献

[1] 吕栋, 戴胜群, 李斐, 等. 断陷盆地前积地震相及其岩性地层油气藏发育规律——以彰武断陷九佛堂组为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2015, 22(1): 16-20.
[2] 吴海波, 王江, 李军辉. 地震多属性融合技术在贝尔凹陷储层预测中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(2): 96-101.
[3] Zeng, H.L. and Kerans, C. (2003) Seismic Frequency Control on Carbonate Seismic Stratigraphy: A Case Study of the Kingdom Abo Sequence, West Texas. AAPG Bulletin, 87, 273-293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 张林清, 张会星, 姜效典, 等. 弹性参数反演与属性融合技术在“甜点”预测中的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(4): 582-588.
[5] 潘光超, 周家雄, 韩光明, 等. 中深层“甜点”储层地震预测力法探讨——以珠江口盆地西部文昌A凹陷为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(1): 94-100.
[6] Traub, K.M., Paola, C., Kim, W., et al. (2014) Experimental Investigation of Sediment Dominated vs. Tectonics Dominated Sediment Transport Systems in Subsiding Basins. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 83, 1162-1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 刘丽媛, 杨宏伟, 李九生, 等. 地层切片技术在油藏开发储层描述中的应用[J]. 断块油气田, 2016, 23(3): 320-323.
[8] 曾洪流, 朱筱敏, 朱如凯, 等. 陆相坳陷型盆地地震沉积学研究规范[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(3): 275-284.
[9] 卫平生, 潘建国, 张虎权, 等. 地震储层学的概念、研究方法和关键技术. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(2): 1-6.
[10] 李超, 廖新武, 侯东梅, 等. 地震沉积学在 BZ19-4 油田中的应用[J]. 断块油气田, 2013, 20(1): 47-50.
[11] 姚威, 吴冲龙, 史原鹏, 等. 利用地震属性融合技术研究洪浩尔舒特凹陷下白垩统沉积相特征[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2013, 48(4): 634-642.
[12] 王志萍, 王保全, 刘艺萌, 等. 渤海油田JZ31构造东二段湖底扇地震沉积学研究[J]. 断块油气田, 2017, 24(4): 452-455.
[13] 刘兴冬. 岩性油藏薄窄砂体地震精细处理解释技术[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2018, 36(4): 137-141.
[14] 李辉峰, 杨 蕾. 泌阳凹陷孙岗地区水下分流河道地震识别及预测[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2012, 33(6): 654-656.