高管激励、过度投资与成本粘性关系实证研究
An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Executive Incentive, Over Investment and Cost Stickiness
DOI: 10.12677/FIA.2021.104016, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张 玲*, 张晓敏：河北农业大学，河北 保定
关键词: 显性激励；隐性激励；过度投资；成本粘性； Explicit Incentive； Implicit Incentive； Over Investment； Cost Stickiness
摘要: 本文研究范围为2013~2017年沪深两市A股制造业上市公司，通过激励方式不同，将高管激励区分为显性激励与隐性激励，分别探索其对成本粘性的影响。结果显示，股权激励的实施可以抑制高管过度投资行为，进而弱化企业成本粘性；而在职消费作为一种隐性激励会刺激高管做出过度投资决策，反而会增加企业成本粘性程度。本文的发现丰富了高管激励对成本粘性影响的研究成果，也证实了过度投资在其中发挥的中介作用。
Abstract: The research scope of this paper is the A-share Manufacturing Listed Companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2013 to 2017. Through different incentive methods, the executive incentive is divided into explicit incentive and implicit incentive, and its impact on Cost Stickiness is explored respectively. The results show that the implementation of equity incentive can inhibit executives’ over investment behavior and weaken the Cost Stickiness of enterprises; as an implicit incentive, on-the-job consumption will stimulate executives to make over investment decisions, but will increase the Cost Stickiness of enterprises. The findings of this paper enrich the research results of the impact of executive incentive on cost stickiness, and also confirm the intermediary role of over investment.
文章引用：张玲, 张晓敏. 高管激励、过度投资与成本粘性关系实证研究[J]. 国际会计前沿, 2021, 10(4): 105-115. https://doi.org/10.12677/FIA.2021.104016

参考文献

[1] Weiss, D. (2010) Cost Behavior and Analysts’ Earnings Forecast. The Accounting Review, 85, 1441-1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Homburg, C., Nasev, J., Reimer, K., et al. (2016) Does Cost Management Affect Credit Risk. Social Science Electronic Publishing, Rochester. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] 张剑英, 王姣. 制造业上市公司高管薪酬对成本粘性的影响[J]. 商业研究, 2015(2): 120-126.
[4] 孙维章, 王灿, 干胜道. 高管薪酬激励与费用粘性克服——基于“薪酬差距”和“薪酬溢价”视角的实证检验[J]. 经济经纬, 2016, 33(3): 96-101.
[5] Anderson, M.C., Banker, R.D. and Janakiraman, S.N. (2003) Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs “Sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 47-63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] 孙铮, 刘浩. 中国上市公司费用“粘性”行为研究[J]. 经济研究, 2004(12): 26-34, 84.
[7] 孔玉生, 朱乃平, 孔庆根. 成本粘性研究: 来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 会计研究, 2007(11): 58-65, 96.
[8] Banker, R., Ciftci, M. and Mashruwala (2012) Managerial Optimism and Cost Behavior. Working Paper.
[9] Kama, I. and Weiss, D. (2013) Do Earnings Targets and Managerial Incentives Affect Sticky Costs? Journal of Accounting Research, 51, 201-224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] 谢获宝, 惠丽丽. 代理问题、公司治理与企业成本粘性——来自我国制造业企业的经验证据[J]. 管理评论, 2014(12): 142-159.
[11] Banker, R.D., Chen, J.Y.S., Kama, I., et al. (2013) Cost Behavior, Expectations and Stock Prices. Social Science Electronic Publishing, Rochester. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] 梁上坤. 股权激励强度是否会影响公司费用黏性[J]. 世界经济, 2016(6): 168-192.
[13] 赵平. 非经济动因下股权激励与民营企业成本粘性[J]. 财会通讯, 2019(27): 74-77, 95.
[14] Jensen, M.C. (1986) The Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow: Corporate Finance and Takeovers. American Economic Review, 76, 323-329.
[15] 谢获宝, 惠丽丽. 投资效率、成本粘性与企业风险——基于宏观经济不确定性的视角[J]. 南京审计学院学报, 2016(2): 3-11.
[16] 侯巧铭, 夏爽, 宋力. 管理者过度自信、非效率投资和成本粘性[J]. 沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016(5): 1-9.
[17] An-derson, B.T. and Bizjak, J. (2000) Corporate Governance and Firm Diversification. Financial Management, 29, 5-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Broussard, J., Buchenroth, S.A. and Pilitte, E.A. (2004) CEO Incentives, Cash Flow, and Investment. Financial Management, 33, 51-70.
[19] 张宏亮, 王靖宇, 缪森林. 晋升激励、薪酬激励与国企过度投资——基于国有上市公司2008-2014年数据的分析[J]. 商业研究, 2017(6): 131-136.
[20] 张涛, 王惠景. 股权激励对上市公司非效率投资影响研究[J]. 会计之友, 2018(1): 101-107.
[21] 温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 张雷. 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J]. 心理学报, 2005(2): 268-274.
[22] Richardson, S. (2006) Over-Investment of Free Cash Flow. Review of Accounting Studies, 11, 159-189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐