财政转移支付“阻返”效应探析——基于慢性贫困与暂时性贫困视角
A Study on Effect of Avoiding Poverty Returning of Transfer Payment—Based on the Angles of Chronic Poverty and Transient Poverty
DOI: 10.12677/MM.2022.122014, PDF,    国家科技经费支持
作者: 张 鹏:重庆大学公共管理学院,重庆;重庆大学公共经济与公共政策研究中心,重庆;连伯文:重庆大学公共管理学院,重庆
关键词: 财政转移支付“阻返”效应慢性贫困暂时性贫困Transfer Payment Effects of Avoiding Poverty Returning Chronic Poverty Transient Poverty
摘要: 基于慢性贫困与暂时性贫困视角,研究财政转移支付差别化“阻返”效应,有助于提高财政转移支付“瞄准”精度和扶贫成效。通过单期识别、跨期分类、实证研究,探析财政转移支付差别化“阻返”效应。发现:财政转移支付能显著抑制经历慢性贫困的脱贫家庭重返贫困,对经历暂时性贫困的脱贫家庭稳固脱贫有抑制性。在后续帮扶工作中,财政转移支付应侧重经历慢性贫困的脱贫家庭,为经历暂时性贫困的脱贫家庭探索实现稳固脱贫的多元方略。
Abstract: Transfer payment has effects of avoiding poverty returning for families out of poverty, it could help to improve the aiming precision of transfer payment, prevent families out of poverty from returning poverty, and improve the quality of poverty alleviation by studying these effects from the angles of chronic poverty and transient poverty. Based on previous conditions of families out of poverty, this paper discerns different categories of families out of poverty by discerning multidimensional poverty in single period, classifying chronic poverty and transient poverty in multiple periods, and regresses the different effects of avoiding poverty returning of transfer payment on families out of poverty that experienced chronic poverty and transient poverty. Conclusions are as follows: Trans-fer payment could prevent families out of poverty that experienced chronic poverty from returning poverty remarkably, but prevent families out of poverty that experienced transient poverty from overcoming poverty stably. Therefore, transfer payment policies should pay enough attention to identifying different poverty experience of families out of poverty and differentiated implementation of transfer payment policies should be paid enough attention to families out of poverty that experienced chronic poverty, and explore other strategies for stable poverty alleviation for families out of poverty that experienced transient poverty.
文章引用:张鹏, 连伯文. 财政转移支付“阻返”效应探析——基于慢性贫困与暂时性贫困视角[J]. 现代管理, 2022, 12(2): 92-102. https://doi.org/10.12677/MM.2022.122014

参考文献

[1] 章元, 万广华, 史清华. 暂时性贫困与慢性贫困的度量、分解和决定因素分析[J]. 经济究, 2013, 48(4): 119-129.
[2] 李翠锦, 李万明. 家庭特征、村庄特征与新疆农村动态贫困[J]. 新疆大学学报(哲学人文社会科学版), 2015, 43(1): 8-13.
[3] 蓝红星. 民族地区慢性贫困问题研究——基于四川大小凉山彝区的实证分析[J]. 软科学, 2013, 27(6): 73-78.
[4] 解垩. 税收和转移支付对收入再分配的贡献[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(8): 116-131.
[5] 卢盛峰, 陈思霞, 时良彦. 走向收入平衡增长: 中国转移支付系统“精准扶贫”了吗?[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(11): 49-64.
[6] Skoufias, E. and Di Maro, V. (2008) Conditional Cash Transfers, Adult Work Incentives, and Poverty. Journal of Development Studies, 44, 935-960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 储德银, 赵飞. 财政分权、政府转移支付与农村贫困——基于预算内外和收支双重维度的门槛效应分析[J]. 财经研究, 2013, 39(9): 4-18.
[8] Imai, K.S. (2011) Poverty, Undernutrition and Vulnerability in Rural India: Role of Rural Public Works and Food for Work Programmes. International Review of Applied Economics, 25, 669-691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Cebula, R.J. and Coombs, C.K. (2008) Recent Evidence on Factors Influencing the Female Labor Force Participation Rate. Journal of Labor Research, 29, 272-284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Darity, W.A. and Myers, S.L. (1987) Do Transfer Payments Keep the Poor in Poverty? The American Economic Review, 77, 216-222.
[11] 孙久文, 夏添. 中国扶贫战略与2020年后相对贫困线划定——基于理论、政策和数据的分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019(10): 98-113.
[12] 陈全功, 李忠斌. 少数民族地区农户持续性贫困探究[J]. 中国农村观察, 2009(5): 39-48+55+96.
[13] 汪为, 吴海涛, 彭继权. 农村家庭多维贫困动态性及其影响因素研究——基于湖北数据的分析[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2018(1): 51-60+83.
[14] 李芝兰, 长期贫困: 度量贫困的新视角——贫困动态研究理论综述[C]//“反贫困与国际区域合作”高层国际研讨会. 成都: 四川大学出版社, 2006: 155-162.
[15] 刘成奎, 任飞容, 王宙翔. 公共产品供给真的能减少中国农村瞬时贫困吗?[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2018, 28(1): 102-112.
[16] 樊丽明, 解垩. 公共转移支付减少了贫困脆弱性吗?[J]. 经济研究, 2014, 49(8): 67-78.
[17] 徐超, 李林木. 城乡低保是否有助于未来减贫——基于贫困脆弱性的实证分析[J]. 财贸研究, 2017, 38(5): 5-19.
[18] 肖攀, 苏静, 刘春晖. “加剧”还是“缓解”: 政府转移支付与农户家庭未来减贫——基于贫困脆弱性视角的实证分析[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2020, 41(4): 86-93.