社交网络时代我国研究生与导师的“典型”互动模式研究
Investigating the Typical Modes of Chinese Faculty-Graduate Interactions in the Social Media Era
DOI: 10.12677/CES.2022.105169, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 王 卓, 常桂香, 辛雅洁:青岛大学师范学院,山东 青岛;杨 洋*:北京师范大学人文和社会科学高等研究院教育科技中心,广东 珠海
关键词: 研究生导师研究生自我决定理论互动模式扎根理论Faculty Mentor Graduate Students Self-Determination Theory Interaction Mode Ground Theory
摘要: 研究生与导师间和谐关系的建立对研究生良好教育体验和学业成就的获得至关重要。本研究通过对来自10所大学的20位在读研究生进行半结构化访谈,并进一步收集了由采访对象自愿提供的与导师的443条社交媒体聊天记录,分析了我国研究生与导师的线上、线下真实互动细节。基于扎根理论的研究范式,我们梳理出三种“典型”互动模式,即毕业驱动型、任务驱动型和成长驱动型。研究发现,这三种“典型”互动模式与自我决定论(self-determination theory)中人类的三种基本需求相互对应,在一定程度上反映了不同互动模式的优势与不足,以及我国导生互动模式面临的主要挑战。本研究结果有助于决策者阐明导生责权,规范双方行为,更好地促进我国导师与研究生的和谐共处与合作双赢。
Abstract: The healthy relationship between faculty mentors and graduate students, which derives from their daily interactions, are critical to students’ studying experiences and academic achievement. Through semi-structured interviews of 20 graduate students in 10 Chinese universities and analysis of 443 pieces faculty-graduate WeChat chat history or these interviewees, the present study sought to investigate the typical modes of faculty-graduate interactions in China and their possible causes through Self-Determination Theory (SDT) by using grounded theory. The findings demonstrated three typical mode, namely, graduation-driven, task-driven, and growth driven modes, which echoed the needs in SDT and illustrated strength and weakness of each mode. The finding could benefit policy makers in establishing rules, clarifying duties and responsibilities, and regularizing behavior of both mentors and graduate students.
文章引用:王卓, 常桂香, 辛雅洁, 杨洋. 社交网络时代我国研究生与导师的“典型”互动模式研究[J]. 创新教育研究, 2022, 10(5): 1043-1052. https://doi.org/10.12677/CES.2022.105169

参考文献

[1] NBSC (2019) National Data. http://data.stats.gov.cn/search.htm?S=2019%E7%A%0%94%7%A9%B6%E7%94%9F
[2] Carey, E.C. and Weissman, D.E. (2010) Understanding and Finding Mentorship: A Review for Junior Faculty. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 13, 1373-1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Wang, G. and Chen, L.A. (2006) Notation on the Mentoring System after Graduate Education Expansion. Contemporary Education Forum, No. 5, 15-17.
[4] Stanley, C.A. (2006) Coloring the Academic Landscape: Faculty of Color Breaking the Silence at Predominately White Colleges and Universities. American Education Research Journal, 4, 701-736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Austin, A.E. (2002) Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 94-122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 许克毅, 叶城, 唐玲. 导师与研究生关系透视[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2000(2): 59-62.
[7] 陈世海, 宋辉, 滕继果. 高校导师与研究生关系研究[J]. 青年探索, 2003(6): 27-30.
[8] 高鹏, 李媛, 张伟倩. 关于导师与研究生关系的调查和实证分析[J]. 科学与科学技术管理, 2007, 28(4): 144-147.
[9] 廖济忠, 王敏. 对新型导生关系的探讨[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报, 2005(8): 56-59.
[10] McCarthy, G. (2015) Motivating and Enabling Adult Learners to Develop Research Skills. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 55, 309-330.
[11] Niemiec, C.P. and Ryan, R.M. (2009) Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness in the Classroom: Applying Self-Determination Theory to Educational Practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 133-144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Butz, N.T. and Stupnisky, R.H. (2017) Improving Student Relatedness through an Online Discussion Intervention: The Application of Self-Determination Theory in Synchronous Hybrid Programs. Computers & Education, 114, 117-138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2007) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Grounded Theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
[14] Merriam, S.B. and Tisdell, E.J. (2016) Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
[15] 朱莉. 研究生教育师生关系研究综述[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2011(11): 61-65.