“共享员工”模式:企业灵活用工新对策
“Sharing Employees” Mode: A New Strategy for Flexible Employment of Enterprises
摘要: 随着人口红利的逐渐衰减,长寿时代的来临给我国劳动力供给侧的改革带来巨大挑战,同时2020年疫情爆发持续影响着企业的发展,中小企业在疫情缓和的情况下出现了难以复工的情况,“共享员工”模式成为国内企业应对疫情进行积极自救的一次创新之举,同时也是对当下劳动力供给侧的改革做了一次重大尝试。本文将探究近年来“共享员工”模式广泛被企业运用的原因,同时探究“共享员工”目前面临的问题以及解决对策。
Abstract: With the gradual decline of the “demographic dividend”, the advent of the age of longevity has brought great challenges to the reform of China’s labor supply side. At the same time, the outbreak of the pandemic in 2020 continues to affect the development of enterprises. Small and medium- sized enterprises are difficult to return to work when the pandemic eases. The “sharing employees” model has become an innovation for domestic enterprises to actively help themselves in response to the pandemic. It is also a major attempt to reform the current labor supply side. This paper will explore the reasons why the “shared employee” model has been widely used by enterprises in recent years, and explore the problems that “shared employee” currently faces and find the solutions.
文章引用:王晓滢, 夏梓洋. “共享员工”模式:企业灵活用工新对策[J]. 现代管理, 2022, 12(7): 838-842. https://doi.org/10.12677/MM.2022.127115

参考文献

[1] 蔡昉. 未来的人口红利——中国经济增长源泉的开拓[J]. 中国人口科学, 2009(1): 2-10+111.
[2] 张海锋. 共享经济时代人力资源管理的趋势[J]. 财经界, 2020(35): 243-244.
[3] 陈东升. 长寿时代的理论与对策[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(4): 66-86+129.
[4] 何江, 闫淑敏, 关娇. 共享员工到底是什么?——源起、内涵、框架与趋势[J]. 商业研究, 2020(6): 1-13.
[5] Kathan, W., Matzler, K., Veider, V., et al. (2016) The Sharing Economy: Your Business Model’s Friend or Foe. Business Horizons, 59, 663-672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 古银华, 王迪, 李平. 共享型人力资源管理模式探索——基于网约车平台的扎根研究[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2017(8): 108-116.
[7] 刘艳. 灵活用工兴起 谁将抢占中国市场先机[J]. 中国商界, 2020(5): 42-43.
[8] 米高蒲志. 《2018年中国灵活用工市场速览报告》: 96%的受访者有意向从事灵活用工工作[EB/OL]. https://www.sohu.com/a/282025666_740247, 2018-12-14.
[9] 李东旭. 共享员工发展现状研究[J]. 企业科技与发展, 2021(9): 129-131.
[10] 肖鹏燕. 合规共享: 共享员工的法律风险与防控[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2020, 37(7): 96-106.
[11] Wilmers, N. (2020) Job Turf or Variety: Task Structure as a Source of Organizational Inequality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65, 1018-1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef