父母教养方式影响子女学习主动性的实证研究
An Empirical Study of Parenting Styles Affecting Children’s Learning Initiatives
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2022.127303, PDF,   
作者: 郑雅妮*:安徽中医药大学,安徽 合肥;周媛礼*#:上海师范大学,上海;邹林婧:中南民族大学,湖北 武汉
关键词: 父母教养方式学习主动性自我效能感中介作用Parenting Style Learning Initiative Self-Efficacy Mediating Role
摘要: 在教育改革的时代背景下,“双减”政策的推出使提高中学生学习主动性愈发重要。为探求学业自我效能感在父母教养方式对中学生学习主动性影响中可能存在的中介作用,本篇研究针对上海市、安徽省、湖北省的中学生进行调查,获得292份有效数据。结果发现,学业自我效能感、中学生学习主动性和父母教养方式均在子女“性别”、“年级”和“是否为独生子女”上差异显著。婚姻状况不同的父母采取的教养方式对子女学习主动性的影响存在显著性差异。在班上学习成绩相异的学生,其父母采取的教养方式差异明显。学习主动性与学业自我效能感密切相关,学业自我效能感部分地中介了父母教养方式和学习主动性之间的关系。情感温暖的父母教养方式有助于中学生学习主动性和学业自我效能感的培养。然而在父母离异、再婚以及非独生子女家庭中成长的中学生,其父母采取情感温暖的教养方式普遍较少并有待提高。
Abstract: In the context of education reform, the introduction of the “double reduction” policy has made it increasingly important to improve students’ learning initiatives. To investigate the possible me-diating role of academic self-efficacy in the influence of parenting style on students’ learning initiative, this study was conducted in Shanghai, Anhui Province, and Hubei Province, and 292 valid data were obtained. The results showed that academic self-efficacy, students’ learning initiative, and parenting style all differed significantly in terms of children’s “gender”, “grade level”, and “only child or not”. Significant differences were found between the parenting styles of parents with different marital status on their children’s learning initiatives. The parenting styles of parents differed significantly between students with different academic performance in the class. Importantly, learning initiative was closely related to academic self-efficacy, and academic self-efficacy partially mediated the relationship between parenting style and learning initiative. Emotionally warmth parenting style contributes to the development of learning initiative and academic self-efficacy in students. However, students growing up in families with divorced or remarried parents and non-one-child families, their parents generally adopted fewer emotional warmth parenting styles which should get more attention.
文章引用:郑雅妮, 周媛礼, 邹林婧 (2022). 父母教养方式影响子女学习主动性的实证研究. 心理学进展, 12(7), 2546-2556. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2022.127303

参考文献

[1] 蒋奖, 鲁峥嵘, 蒋苾菁, 许燕(2010). 简式父母教养方式问卷中文版的初步修订. 心理发展与教育, 26(1), 94-99.
[2] 赖焕明(2016). 小学数学教学中学生主动性的培养. 华夏教师, (2), 57-58.
[3] 李宇鹏(2021). 初中生父母教养方式特征及其与学业成绩的关系. 青少年研究与实践, (1), 22-29.
[4] 梁宇颂(2000). 大学生成就目标、归因方式与学业自我效能感的研究. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 华中师范大学.
[5] 林少惠(2016). 高中生学习主动性自评问卷的编制. 中小学心理健康教育, (6), 4-7.
[6] 林少惠(2020). 高中生主动性人格、学习主动性与学业成绩的关系. 中小学心理健康教育, (18), 15-21.
[7] 陆云, 吕林海, 葛中芹, 王志军, 庄建军(2016). 我国研究型大学本科生学习主动性的实证研究——以8所高校电子信息专业学生为例. 教学研究, (4), 1-7.
[8] 孙向超(2020). 高校学生父母教养方式、学习动机与自主学习能力的关系. 心理月刊, (18), 85-88
[9] 陶言强, 周相宜(2016). 父母教养方式与大学生自我效能感的相关研究. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 37(S1), 186-190.
[10] 王峰, 闫春燕, 伊文涛, 马杰(2022). 建构学习仪式感, 提升学习主动性——以元素化学学习为例. 化学教育(中英文), 43(4), 43-48
[11] 吴曼曼(2021). 高一学生学业自我效能感和个人成长主动性的关系及干预研究. 硕士学位论文, 石家庄: 河北师范大学.
[12] 谢云天, 史滋福, 尹霖, 兰洛(2022). 中国父母教养方式与儿童学业成绩关系的元分析. 心理发展与教育, (3), 366-379.
[13] 杨青松(2022). 学业自我效能感对中学生考试焦虑的影响: 链式中介效应及性别差异. 中国临床心理学杂志, (2), 414-420.
[14] 张嘉伟(2013). 体育教学中各要素对学生学习主动性的影响. 教育与职业, (15), 182-183.
[15] 周薇(2012). 高中生学习的自我监控与父母教养方式及学业成绩的关系. 硕士学位论文, 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨师范大学.
[16] Arrindell, W. A., Sanavio, E., Aguilar, G., Sica, C., Hatzichristou, C., Eisemann, M., & van der Ende, J. (1999). The Development of a Short Form of the EMBU: Its Appraisal with Students in Greece, Guatemala, Hungary and Italy. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 613-628.[CrossRef
[17] Bandura, A., Bandura, S., & Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundation of Thoughts and Actions: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall.
[18] Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). Contexts of Child Rearing: Problems and Prospects. American Psychologist, 34, 844-850.[CrossRef
[19] Chen, X., & Shi, W. (2016). Cross-Legged Regression Analysis of Relationship between Academic Self-Concept and Academic Achievement in Primary and Middle School Students: Test of Reciprocal Effect Model and Development Perspective. Psychological Development and Education, 32, 81-88.
[20] Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting Style as Context: An Integrative Model. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 487-496.[CrossRef
[21] Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Publications, 51, 335-337.[CrossRef
[22] Ngesu, L., & Atieno, A. F. (2019). Influence of Home and School Based Factors on Pupils Academic Performance at Kenya Certificate of Primary Education in Makadara Sub-County, Nairobi County.[CrossRef
[23] Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33.[CrossRef
[24] Seng, N. L., Hanafi, Z., & Taslikhan, M. B. (2016). Parenting Styles and Academic Achievement. Scholars Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 4, 193-200.
[25] Thimm, J. C. (2010). Mediation of Early Maladaptive Schemas between Perceptions of Parental Rearing Style and Personality Disorder Symptoms. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41, 52-59.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Wu, P., Robinson, C. C., Yang, C., Hart, C. H., Olsen, S. F., Porter, C. L., & Wu, X. (2002). Similarities and Differences in Mothers’ Parenting of Preschoolers in China and the United States. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 481-491.[CrossRef
[27] Yang, J., & Zhao, X. (2020). Parenting Styles and Children’s Academic Performance: Evidence from Middle Schools in China. Children and Youth Services Review, 113, Article ID: 105017.[CrossRef
[28] Young, B. J., Wallace, D. P., Imig, M., Borgerding, L., Brown-Jacobsen, A. M., & Whiteside, S. P. (2013). Parenting Behaviors and Childhood Anxiety: A Psychometric Investigation of the EMBU-C. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 138-1146.[CrossRef