材料类型和数量对发展性计算障碍儿童数序判断的影响
The Influence of Material Type and Quantity on Number Order Judgment in Children with Developmental Dyscalculia
DOI: 10.12677/IJPN.2022.113007, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 周路平:湖南师范大学教育科学学院,湖南 长沙
关键词: 发展性计算障碍儿童数序判断材料类型数量Developmental Dyscalculia Children Number Order Judgment Material Type Quantity
摘要: 目的:了解材料类型和数量对发展性计算障碍儿童数序判断的影响,为改善儿童的数序认知及数学学习状况提供参考。方法:采用数序前后比较任务,以阿拉伯数字、汉语小写数字、点阵数字及实物个数为材料,对26名计算障碍儿童和25名正常儿童进行测试。结果:在完成正确数上,不论是符号刺激(阿拉伯数字:F = 11.568,p = 0.001,η2 = 0.147;汉语数字:F = 7.498,p = 0.008,η2 = 0.101)还是非符号刺激(点阵数字:F = 6.985,p = 0.010,η2 = 0.094;实物材料:F = 7.781,p = 0.007,η2 = 0.104),计算障碍儿童均明显不及正常儿童。在完成时间上,与正常儿童相比,计算障碍儿童在符号刺激中(阿拉伯数字:F = 4.972,p = 0.029,η2 = 0.069;汉语数字:F = 7.155,p = 0.009,η2 = 0.096)差异明显,但在非符号刺激上,二者差异不显著。计算障碍儿童小数量符号刺激的完成时间好于大数量,而大数量非符号刺激则快于小数量;正常儿童不论是符号刺激还是非符号刺激,其小数量的完成时间均好于大数量。结论:刺激材料的类型和数量不仅影响计算障碍儿童的数序判断,而且对数字距离效应产生消极作用。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the influence of material type and quantity on number order judgment in children with developmental, and improve the number order cognition and mathematics learning of children. Methods: Using Arabic numerals, Chinese numerals, lattice numerals and material objects, 26 children with dyscalculia and 25 normal children were tested with the task of comparing number order. Results: In the correct number, whether it is a symbolic stimulus (Arabic numerals: F = 11.568, p = 0.001, η2 = 0.147; Chinese numerals: F = 7.498, p = 0.008, η2 = 0.101) or non-symbolic stimulus (dot matrix: F = 6.985, p = 0.010, η2 = 0.094; material object: F = 7.781, p = 0.007, η2 = 0.104), children with dyscalculia were significantly lower than normal children. In terms of completion time, compared with normal children, children with dyscalculia is obvious difference in symbolic stimulation (Arabic numerals: F = 4.972, p = 0.029, η2 = 0.069; Chinese numeral: F = 7.155, p = 0.009, η2 = 0.096), but there is no significant difference in non-symbolic stimuli. In dyscalculia children, the completion time of the small number of symbolic stimuli was better than that of the large number, while the large number of non-symbolic stimuli was faster than that of the small number. For both symbolic and non-symbolic stimuli in normal children, the completion time of a small amount of stimulus is better than that of a large amount of stimulus. Conclusion: The type and quantity of stimulus materials not only affect the number order judgment of children with dyscalculia, but also have a negative effect on the number distance effect.
文章引用:周路平. 材料类型和数量对发展性计算障碍儿童数序判断的影响[J]. 国际神经精神科学杂志, 2022, 11(3): 41-46. https://doi.org/10.12677/IJPN.2022.113007

参考文献

[1] 张树东, 董奇. 发展性计算障碍的诊断与矫治[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2004(2): 21-25.
[2] Gliksman, Y. and Henik, A. (2018) Conceptual Size in Developmental Dyscalculia and Dyslexia. Neuropsychology, 32, 190-198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Bugden, S. and Ansari, D. (2016) Probing the Nature of Deficits in the ‘Approximate Number System’ in Children with Persistent Developmental Dyscalculia. Developmental Science, 19, 817-833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Devine, A., Hill, F., Carey, E. and Szűcs, D. (2018) Cognitive and Emotional Math Problems Largely Dissociate: Prevalence of Developmental Dyscalculia and Mathematics Anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110, 431-444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Butterworth, B. (1999) The Mathematical Brain. Macmillan, Lon-don.
[6] Landerl, K., Bevan, A. and Butterworth, B. (2004) Developmental Dyscalculia and Basic Numerical Capaci-ties: A Study of 8-9-Year-Old Students. Cognition, 93, 99-125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Rousselle, L. and Noël, M.P. (2007) Basic Numerical Skills in Children with Mathematics Learning Disabilities: A Comparison of Symbolic vs Non-Symbolic Number Magnitude Processing. Cognition, 102, 361-395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Cañizares, D., Crespo, V. and Alemañy, E. (2012) Symbolic and Non-Symbolic Number Magnitude Processing in Children with Developmental Dyscalculia. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 952-966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 张丽, 蒋慧, 赵立. 发展性计算障碍儿童的数量转换缺陷[J]. 心理科学, 2018, 41(2): 337-343.
[10] Brannon, E.M. (2001) The Development of Ordinal Numerical Competence in Young Children. Cognition Psychology, 43, 53-81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Kuhl, U., Sobotta, S., Consortium, L. and Skeide, M.A. (2021) Mathematical Learning Deficits Originate in Early Childhood from Atypical Development of a Frontoparietal Brain Net-work. PLOS Biology, 19, e3001407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 高航, 周路平. 数序认知的特征及神经机制[J]. 临床神经电生理学杂志, 2007, 25(17): 61-64.
[13] Wiese, H. (2003) Numbers Language and the Human Mind. Cambridge Uni-versity Press, Cambridge.
[14] 孙霁, 孙沛. 发展性计算障碍成年人数量加工机制的实验研究[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2019(6): 56-62
[15] 范晓玲, 龚耀先. 4-6年级多重成就测验的编制[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2005, 13(3): 253-257
[16] 李小溪, 杨佳欣, 路浩, 王芳, 赵晖. 发展性计算障碍的基本数量加工缺陷及一般认知特征[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2015(8): 56-63.
[17] Lee, M.R., Ashkenazi, S., Chen, T., Young, C.B., Geary, D.C. and Menon, V. (2015) Brain Hyper-Connectivity and Operation-Specific Deficits during Arithmetic Problem Solving in Children with Devel-opmental Dyscalculia. Developmental Science, 18, 351-372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]