员工资质过剩感、越轨创新与创新绩效关系研究
Research on the Relationship between Employee Over-Qualification, Deviant Innovation and Innovative Performance
DOI: 10.12677/MM.2022.1210184, PDF,   
作者: 尚 校, 郑强国：北方工业大学经济管理学院，北京
关键词: 资质过剩感；越轨创新；创新绩效；Over-Qualification； Deviant Innovation； Innovative Performance
摘要: 本研究基于自我决定理论、自我验证理论来探讨员工资质过剩感、越轨创新和创新绩效之间的关系，通过调查问卷所采集数据的层次回归结果可得出以下结论：员工资质过剩感对创新绩效具有倒U型影响；越轨创新在员工资质过剩感与创新绩效关系中具有中介作用；领导–成员交换关系的质量越高，员工资质过剩感对越轨创新的影响越强。研究结论为企业如何管理和充分发挥员工资质提供新的思路和建议。
Abstract: Based on the self-determination theory and self-verification theory, this study explores the relationship between employee qualification excess, deviant innovation and innovation performance. Through the hierarchical regression results of the data collected by the questionnaire, it can be concluded that the sense of employee qualification overqualification has an inverted U-shaped effect on innovation performance; Deviant innovation plays an intermediary role in the relationship between employee excess qualification and innovation performance; The higher the quality of the leadership-member exchange relationship, the stronger the influence of employee overqualification on deviant innovation. The research conclusions provide new ideas and suggestions for how enterprises can manage and give full play to employee qualifications.
文章引用：尚校, 郑强国. 员工资质过剩感、越轨创新与创新绩效关系研究[J]. 现代管理, 2022, 12(10): 1416-1426. https://doi.org/10.12677/MM.2022.1210184

参考文献

[1] 李珲, 丁刚. 资质过剩对新生代员工创新绩效的作用机理——工作塑造的中介作用与职业延迟满足的调节效应[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2019(6): 3-9.
[2] 何伟怡, 张梦桃. 资质过剩、心理距离与员工创新行为: 企业社会责任的跨层调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(8): 144-152.
[3] Maynard, D.C., Joseph, T.A. and Maynard, A.M. (2006) Underemployment, Job Attitudes, and Turnover Intentions. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27, 509-536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] 赵卫红, 崔勋, 曹霞. 过度胜任感对员工绩效的影响机制——有中介的调节模型[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016, 37(6): 169-180.
[5] 赵李晶, 张正堂, 宋锟泰. 资质过剩对员工建言行为的影响机制研究——内部人身份认知和心理特权的作用[J]. 经济经纬, 2018, 35(6): 101-106.
[6] 王弘钰, 于佳利. 越轨创新影响过程的多层次动态演化: 基于事件系统理论的纵向案例研究[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2022, 39(7): 6-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Zhang, M.J., Law, K.S. and Lin, B. (2016) You Think You Are Big Fish in a Small Pond? Perceived Overqualification, Goal Orientations, and Proactivity at Work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 61-84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] 赵李晶, 张正堂, 宋锟泰, 陈钰瑶. 资质过剩对员工创造力的影响研究: 一个被调节的中介模型[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2020, 41(4): 83-97.
[9] 梁昊, 李锡元, 舒熳. 资质过剩对员工创新行为的影响——一个跨层的调节模型[J]. 软科学, 2019, 33(2): 122-125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] 王朝晖. 大材小用的员工如何发挥创造力?——愤怒、创造自我效能和调节定向的作用[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2018, 30(5): 92-103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] 张建平, 刘善仕, 李焕荣. 资质过剩感知与员工内部创业的曲线关系及作用机制研究[J]. 管理学报, 2020, 17(6): 861-870.
[12] 辜美惜. Swann自我验证理论及实证研究简介[J]. 心理科学进展, 2004(3): 423-428.
[13] 周霞, 王雯童. 资质过剩感对知识型员工越轨创新的影响——有调节的中介模型[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(1): 151-159.
[14] Criscuolo, P., Salter, A. and Ter Wal, A.L.J. (2014) Going Underground: Bootlegging and Individual Innovative Performance. Organization Science, 25, 1287-1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] 褚福磊, 王蕊. 资质过剩感与亲组织不道德行为: 心理特权与谦卑型领导的作用[J]. 心理科学, 2019, 42(2): 365-371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] 后玉蓉, 吴群琪, 桂嘉伟. 资质过剩感知与员工时间侵占行为的关系研究: 自我决定感和威权领导的作用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(8): 203-209.
[17] 邓艳芳. 员工越轨创新研究综述与展望[J]. 领导科学, 2019(12): 61-64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] 黄玮, 项国鹏, 杜运周, 刘洋. 越轨创新与个体创新绩效的关系研究——地位和创造力的联合调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2017, 20(1): 143-154.
[19] Augsdorfer, P. (2012) A Diagnostic Personality Test to Identify Likely Corporate Bootleg Researchers. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16, Article ID: 1250003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[20] 姜诗尧, 郝金磊, 李方圆. 资源保存理论视角下领导-成员交换对员工创新行为的影响[J]. 首都经济贸易大学学报, 2019, 21(6): 92-99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] 孙健敏, 陈乐妮, 尹奎. 挑战性压力源与员工创新行为: 领导-成员交换与辱虐管理的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(4): 436-449.
[22] 徐本华, 邓传军, 武恒岳. 领导成员交换与员工主动创新行为: 一个被中介的调节模型[J]. 管理科学, 2021, 34(2): 44-55.
[23] Dulebohn, J.H., Bommer, W.H., Liden, R.C., Brouer, R.L. and Ferris, G.R. (2012) A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Consequences of Leader-Member Exchange: Integrating the Past with an Eye toward the Future. Journal of Management, 38, 1715-1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[24] Gottfredson, R.K., Wright, S.L. and Heaphy, E.D. (2020) A Cri-tique of the Leader-Member Exchange Construct: Back to Square One. The Leadership Quarterly, 31, Article ID: 101385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] Johnson, G.J. and Johnson, W.R. (1997) Perceived Overqualifi-cation, Emotional Support, and Health. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1906-1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[26] Lin, B., Mainemelis, C. and Kark, R. (2016) Leaders’ Responses to Creative Deviance: Differential Effects on Subsequent Creative Deviance and Creative Performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 537-556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[27] Janssen, O. and Van Yperen, N.W. (2004) Employees’ Goal Orientations, the Quality of Leader-Member Exchange, and the Outcomes of Job Performance and Job Satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 368-384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[28] Graen, G.B. and Uhl-Bien, M. (1995) Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Mul-ti-Level Multi-Domain Perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐