辅助性手段下国际商事仲裁协议有效性研究
Research on the Effectiveness of International Commercial Arbitration Agreements under Auxiliary Means
摘要: 国际商事仲裁协议的有效性关系到仲裁协议的仲裁准据法确定、裁决执行、仲裁机关选择等问题,因而在国际商事仲裁实践中具有重要意义。影响仲裁协议效力的原因一般为仲裁条款约定不明,约定机构不准确,协议内部矛盾等原因。对于国际贸易中,仲裁协议的效力可以参考国际通行的效力确定准则,尽可能撮合交易,确立有效性。可以通过利于有效性、准据法分裂和突破书面形式等辅助手段确定有效性,借以实现国际仲裁协议的有效性最大化。
Abstract:
The validity of an international commercial arbitration agreement is related to issues such as the determination of the applicable law of the arbitration agreement, the enforcement of the award, and the selection of the arbitration institution, so it is of great significance in the practice of international commercial arbitration. Reasons that affect the validity of an arbitration agreement are generally unclear stipulations in the arbitration clause, inaccurate agreement institutions, and internal contradictions in the agreement. For international trade, the validity of an arbitration agreement can refer to the internationally accepted criteria for determining the validity of an arbitration agreement to match transactions as much as possible and establish validity. Validity can be determined through auxiliary means such as favoring validity, splitting applicable law, and breaking through written forms, so as to maximize the validity of international arbitration agreements.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会. 2020中国国际商事仲裁年度报告[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021: 13.
|
|
[2]
|
汪祖兴. 国际商会仲裁研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2005: 143.
|
|
[3]
|
杨良宜, 莫世杰, 等. 仲裁法从1996年英国仲裁法到国际商务仲裁[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2006: 66-69.
|
|
[4]
|
王克玉. 合同债权与仲裁条款转让的再审视——基于实体法、程序法和冲突法的视角[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2013, 31(4): 141-147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
陈翔. 论国际商事仲裁协议效力的扩张[J]. 法制与社会, 2013(29): 245-246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
肖建国, 黎弘博. 仲裁协议默示放弃规则的重构——以《仲裁法》第26条后半部分为中心[J]. 法律适用, 2021(8): 21-30.
|