人工智能时代算法侵害的类型化分析与法律规制
Typological Analysis and Legal Regulation of Algorithm Infringement in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
摘要: 人工智能算法具有复杂性、类人性与危险性,在应用的过程中给社会造成不同类型的侵害。根据侵害的严重性不同,可分为较为轻微的精神性一般人格权侵害、物理世界较为严重的人身和财产损害、物理世界严重的人身财产损害。又可以细分为:信息茧房、对人自由表达的限制、算法歧视、大数据杀熟、算法瑕疵决策侵害、算法错误。针对这些侵害,可以尝试让算法侵权的集体管理机构代行职权、物理世界的人身财产损害实行危险责任、明确算法侵害的集合式责任。
Abstract:
Artificial intelligence algorithms are complex, humanoid and dangerous, and cause different types of harm to society in the process of application. According to the severity of the infringement, it can be divided into relatively minor infringement of general personality rights of the mental nature, more serious personal and property damage in the physical world, and serious personal and property damage in the physical world. It can be subdivided into: information cocoon, restrictions on people’s free expression, algorithm discrimination, big data killing, algorithm flaws, decision-making infringement, and algorithm errors. In view of these infringements, we can try to let the collective management institution of algorithm infringement act on its behalf, implement dan-gerous liability for personal and property damage in the physical world, and clarify the collective liability for algorithm infringement.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
姜野. 算法的规训与规训的算法: 人工智能时代算法的法律规制[J]. 河北法学, 2018, 36(12): 142-153.
|
|
[2]
|
(美)特伦斯∙谢罗夫斯基. 深度学习[M]. 姜悦兵, 译. 北京: 中信出版社, 2019.
|
|
[3]
|
王莹. 算法侵害类型化研究与法律应对——以《个人信息保护法》为基点的算法规制扩展构想[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2021(6): 133-153.
|
|
[4]
|
(美)凯斯∙R∙桑斯坦. 信息乌托邦——众人如何产生知识[M]. 毕竞悦, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2008.
|
|
[5]
|
王涵. “大数据杀熟”背后的技术隐忧[N]. 民主与法制时报, 2021-01-07(05).
|
|
[6]
|
余耀军, 高利红. 人工智能时代的法学教育变革[J]. 新文科教育研究, 2021(2): 56-69.
|
|
[7]
|
丁晓东. 个人信息私法保护的困境与出路[J]. 法学研究, 2018(6): 194-206.
|
|
[8]
|
周子琪. 论算法侵害的私法规制[J]. 湖南社会科学, 2022(3): 87-96.
|
|
[9]
|
王莹. 算法侵害责任框架刍议[J]. 中国法学, 2022(3): 165-184.
|