著作权商业化维权背景下的司法应对——以罗伊视效动漫公司著作权维权系列案为视角
Judicial Response under the Background of Commercialization and Protection of Copyright—From the Perspective of Roi Visual Co., Ltd.’s Copyright Protection Series Cases
摘要: 自我国经济不断平稳发展,著作权人维权意识日益提高,诉诸法院的著作权案件也迅猛增长,大范围的商业维权案也日益增多。在著作权商业维权中,出现了较多同案不同判的现象。本文通过对罗伊视效著作权批量维权诉讼系列案进行深入研究,发现法院在认定合法来源抗辩以及被告赔偿额出现了较多困境。本文认为合法来源的证明标准应当以高度盖然性为标准,不宜苛求被告过高的审查注意义务,只要能说明侵权物品的来源、支付了合理对价即可成立合法来源抗辩。对于判赔额度来说,应在穷尽其他判赔规则之后才适用法定赔偿。
Abstract: With the continuous and stable development of China’s economy, the awareness of copyright owners in safeguarding their rights is increasing day by day. The number of copyright cases seeking legal action in the courts is also rapidly increasing, and a large number of commercial rights protection cases are also increasing. In the commercial protection of copyright, there have been many phenomena of different judgments in the same case. This article conducts in-depth research on the series of lawsuits related to the bulk protection of Roi Visual Co., Ltd.’s copyright, and finds that the court has encountered many difficulties in identifying legitimate sources of defense and compensating the defendant. This article believes that the proof standard for legitimate sources should be based on a high degree of probability, and it is not advisable to impose excessive review and attention obligations on the defendant. As long as the source of the infringing item can be explained and reasonable consideration has been paid, a legitimate source defense can be established. For the compensation limit, statutory compensation should only be applied after exhausting other com-pensation rules.
文章引用:黄文柬. 著作权商业化维权背景下的司法应对——以罗伊视效动漫公司著作权维权系列案为视角[J]. 法学, 2023, 11(5): 3885-3892. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2023.115554

参考文献

[1] 董伟威, 童海超. 知识产权商业维权诉讼的界定与规制[J]. 人民司法, 2014(1): 12-18.
[2] 何震, 杨元新. 商业化维权对著作权侵权案件审理的挑战与应对[J]. 法律适用, 2012(7): 93-96.
[3] 孔祥俊. 以创新的思路保护创新——当前知识产权审判新思考[J]. 人民司法, 2013(9): 31-39.
[4] 闫文军, 李金潇. 著作权法中合法来源抗辩规则的适用[J]. 科技与法律(中英文), 2021(4): 57-65.
[5] 丁文严. 论知识产权侵权诉讼中合法来源抗辩的构成要件[J]. 知识产权, 2017(12): 52-58.
[6] 曹新明. 我国知识产权侵权损害赔偿计算标准新设计[J]. 现代法学, 2019, 41(1): 110-124.
[7] 王迁, 谈天, 朱翔. 知识产权侵权损害赔偿: 问题与反思[J]. 知识产权, 2016(5): 34-39.
[8] 宋健. 知识产权损害赔偿问题探讨——以实证分析为视角[J]. 知识产权, 2016(5): 10-19.
[9] 詹映. 我国知识产权侵权损害赔偿司法现状再调查与再思考——基于我国11984件知识产权侵权司法判例的深度分析[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2020, 38(1): 191-200.
[10] 范晓波. 知识产权的价值与侵权损害赔偿[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2016.
[11] 曾玉珊. 论知识产权侵权损害的法定赔偿[J]. 学术研究, 2006(12): 75-79+147.
[12] 周晖国. 知识产权法定赔偿的司法适用[J]. 知识产权, 2007(1): 3-10.