资产管理人ESG投资的省思与制度因应——基于信义义务的分析
Reflection and Institutional Response on ESG Investment by Asset Managers—Analysis Based on Fiduciary Obligations
摘要: ESG投资以可持续发展、良好的公司治理及社会责任践行为价值导向,基本理念与投资收益模式不同于传统的投资方向。ESG理念纳入资产管理人考量的投资要素时,遭遇了与信义义务存在冲突的质疑。深入剖析可知,ESG投资并未偏离受益人利益最大化需求,符合资产管理人信义义务的内在逻辑,且能够实现与资产管理行业目标的一致性。有必要通过ESG披露与评级制度完善、资产管理人信义义务的体系化构建、资产管理人法律责任的明晰等举措促进资产管理人ESG投资的法治保障,实现资产管理行业良性发展与经济高质量发展的共赢。
Abstract:
ESG investment is value oriented towards sustainable development, good corporate governance, and social responsibility practices. Its basic philosophy and investment return model are different from traditional investment directions. When incorporating ESG concepts into the investment elements considered by asset managers, there have been doubts about conflicts with fiduciary obligations. Through in-depth analysis, it can be seen that ESG investment has not deviated from the need to maximize the interests of beneficiaries, conforms to the inherent logic of the fiduciary obligations of asset managers, and can achieve consistency with the goals of the asset management industry. It is necessary to promote the legal protection of ESG investment by asset managers through measures such as improving the ESG disclosure and rating system, systematizing the fiduciary obligations of asset managers, and clarifying the legal responsibilities of asset managers, in order to achieve a win-win situation between the healthy development of the asset management industry and high-quality economic development.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
章晟, 李士岩. 资产管理业务信托属性分析及其法律监管制度研究[J]. 江汉论坛, 2016(3): 129-133.
|
|
[2]
|
高民尚. 审理证券、期货、国债市场中委托理财案件的若干法律问题[J]. 人民司法, 2006(6): 27-37.
|
|
[3]
|
缪因知. 资产管理内部法律关系之定性: 回顾与前瞻[J]. 法学家, 2018(3): 98-112.
|
|
[4]
|
Garner, B.A. (2009) Black’s Law Dictionary. Thomson West, Oversea Publishing House, 1402.
|
|
[5]
|
刘燕. 大资管“上位法”之究问[J]. 清华金融评论, 2018(4): 25-28.
|
|
[6]
|
白牧蓉, 李其贺. 去刚性兑付时代资产管理人信义义务的回归[J]. 开发研究, 2021(4): 98-108.
|
|
[7]
|
UN PRI (联合国责任投资原则组织)网站相关数据[EB/OL]. https://www.unpri.org, 2022-11-12.
|
|
[8]
|
刘杰勇. 论ESG投资与信义义务的冲突和协调[J]. 财经法学, 2022(5): 162-178.
|
|
[9]
|
梅饶兰. ESG投资对上市企业股票收益率的影响分析[J]. 江苏商论, 2021(12): 118-121.
|
|
[10]
|
Dai, Y. (2021) Can ESG Investing Beat the Market and Improve Portfolio Diversification? Evidence from China. The Chinese Economy, 54, 272-285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[11]
|
张小溪, 马宗明. 双碳目标下ESG与上市公司高质量发展——基于ESG“101”框架的实证分析[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 22(5): 101-122.
|
|
[12]
|
Gordon Smith, D. (2002) The Critical Resource Theory of Fiduciary Duty. Vanderbilt Law Review, 55, 1413-1414, 1438-1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[13]
|
段兵. 大资管时代银行理财的特色化发展[J]. 中国金融, 2022(17): 28-30.
|
|
[14]
|
白牧蓉, 张嘉鑫. 上市公司ESG信息披露制度构建路径探究[J]. 财会月刊, 2022(7): 90-99.
|
|
[15]
|
王涌. 让资产管理行业回归大信托的格局[J]. 清华金融评论, 2018(1): 82-84.
|
|
[16]
|
刘燕. 大资管“上位法”之究问[J]. 清华金融评论, 2018(4): 25-28.
|
|
[17]
|
郭雳, 彭雨晨. 新发展格局下资管业务管理人信义义务研究[J]. 江汉论坛, 2021(7): 137-144.
|