政策信息对相关上市公司股价波动的影响——以“专精特新小巨人”企业为例
The Impact of Policy Information on Stock Price Fluctuations of Related Listed Companies—Taking the “Specialized, Refined, Unique, and Innovative Little Giant” Enterprise as an Example
摘要: 政策信息如何影响相关上市公司股价波动?本文从事件研究法出发,选取2021年4月23日关于开展第三批专精特新“小巨人”企业培育工作的通知作为“专精特新”政策信息事件,基于238家“专精特新小巨人”上市公司的股价数据,检验了“专精特新”政策信息的发布与“专精特新小巨人”企业股价波动的因果关系。本文还构建了截面回归,探讨股价波动的其他影响因素。研究结果显示:“专精特新”政策信息对相关上市公司股价波动具有显著的正向影响,企业成长性与研发投入对企业的累计超额收益率具有显著正向影响,政府补贴对企业的累计超额收益率影响显著为负。此外,政策信息对相关上市公司股价波动的影响还存在行业和政府补贴差异。最后,基于以上的研究结果从政府、市场和投资者三个方面分别提出了相应的政策建议。
Abstract:
How does policy information affect stock price fluctuations of related listed companies? Starting from the event study method, this article selects the notice on April 23, 2021 regarding the cultivation of the third batch of specialized, refined, and innovative “little giant” enterprises as the “specialized, refined, unique, and innovative” policy information event. Based on the stock price data of 238 listed companies of “specialized, refined, unique, and innovative little giant”, the causal relationship between the release of “specialized, refined, unique, and innovative” policy information and the stock price fluctuations of “specialized, refined, unique, and innovative little giant” enterprises is tested. This article also constructs a cross-sectional regression to explore other influencing factors of stock price volatility. The research results show that the policy information of “specialization, refinement, uniqueness, and novelty” has a significant positive impact on the stock price fluctuations of related listed companies. The growth of enterprises and R&D investment have a significant positive impact on their cumulative excess return, while government subsidies have a significant negative impact on their cumulative excess return. In addition, there are industry and government subsidy differences in the impact of policy information on the stock price fluctuations of related listed companies. Finally, based on the above research results, corresponding policy recommendations were proposed from three aspects: government, market, and investors.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Berkowitz, D., Lin, C. and Ma, Y. (2015) Do Property Rights Matter? Evidence from a Property Law Enactment. Journal of Financial Economics, 116, 583-593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
Morck, R., Yeung, B. and Yu, W. (2000) The Information Content of Stock Markets: Why Do Emerging Markets Have Synchronous Stock Price Movements? Journal of Financial Economics, 59, 215-260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
Schwert G.W. (1991) Indexes of Unite States Stock Price from 1802 to 1987. The Journal of Business, 63, 399-426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
Brandt, M.W., Brav, A. and Graham, J.R. (2010) The Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle: Time Trendor Speculative Episode? Review of Financial Studies, 23, 863-899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
陆蓉, 徐龙炳. 中国股票市场对政策信息不平衡反应研究[J]. 经济学, 2000(2): 3-7.
|
|
[6]
|
赵立萍. 中国股指波动的政策信息和投资者行为效应影响[J]. 经济论坛, 2012(12): 82-85.
|
|
[7]
|
肖珑. 政策性因素对中国股价波动的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 湘潭: 湘潭大学, 2006.
|
|
[8]
|
银慧. 政策性因素在中国股价波动中的作用[J]. 湖南财经高等专科学校学报, 2005(4): 1-2.
|
|
[9]
|
陈迪. 政策对相关概念股价格的影响——以人工智能板块为例[J]. 对外经贸, 2019(12): 88-92, 120.
|
|
[10]
|
赵振全, 张宇. 国股票市场波动和宏观经济波动关系的实证研究[J]. 数量经济技术研究, 2003(6): 143-146.
|
|
[11]
|
张卫国, 马文霞, 任九泉. 中国股价指数与宏观经济影响因素的协整关系研究[J]. 当代经济科学, 2002(11): 7-11.
|
|
[12]
|
李雄平, 王亚茹, 李永前. 托宾Q理论对上市公司投资价值分析的思考[J]. 当代经济, 2018(17): 26-29.
|
|
[13]
|
陈东, 邢䨬. 政府补贴会提升企业的投资规模和质量吗——基于国有企业和民营企业对比的视角[J]. 山西财经大学校报, 2019(8): 84-99.
|