《民法典》时代:CISG在中国法院的适用现状
The Era of “Civil Code”: The Application Status of CISG in Chinese Courts
摘要: CISG是国际贸易领域最有影响力的条约,从88年在我国正式生效至今已有三十几年的时间,各级法院审理的国际货物买卖合同案件越来越多。然而,《民法通则》废止以后,关于国际条约的适用原则仅存在于少数单行法,也没有关于CISG统一的司法解释。从近年来的司法实践看,我国司法机关对CISG的适用仍存在着诸多问题,主要体现在以下方面:涉外民商事审判CISG的适用率太低、对CISG与冲突法规范关系没有正确理解、错误理解CISG第6条,剥夺了当事人的选择权。本文旨在通过分析CISG的适用规则以及国内司法实践,指出我国法院存在的问题及其成因并提出解决方案。
Abstract:
CISG is the most influential treaty in the field of international trade, which has been in effect in China for more than thirty years since 1988. More and more international contracts for the sale of goods are being heard by courts at all levels. However, after the abolition of the General Principles of Civil Law, the principle of application of international treaties only existed in a few laws, and there was no unified judicial interpretation of CISG. From the judicial practice in recent years, there are still many problems in the application of CISG by China’s judicial organs, mainly reflected in the following aspects: the application rate of CISG in foreign-related civil and commercial trials is too low, there is no correct understanding of the relationship between CISG and conflict rules, and there is a misunderstanding of Article 6 of CISG, which deprives the parties of their right to choose. This article aims to analyze the application rules of CISG and domestic judicial practice, point out the problems and their causes in Chinese courts, and propose solutions.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王勇. 论中国法院适用《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》的不足与完善[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2014(2): 153-156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
联合国国际贸易法委员会(2016) [EB/OL]. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/zh/cisg_digest_2016_c.pdf, 2023-08-26.
|
|
[3]
|
(2014) CISG-AC Opinion No. 16, Exclusion of the CISG under Article 6, Rapporteur: Doctor Lisa Spagnolo, Monash University, Australia. The CISG Advisory Council Following Its 19th Meeting, Pretoria, 30 May 2014.
|
|
[4]
|
李佳. 《民法典》背景下《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》的司法适用研究[J]. 上海对外经贸大学学报, 2023, 30(3): 76-87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
车丕照. 论条约在我国的适用[J]. 法学杂志, 2005(3): 96-99.
|
|
[6]
|
张普. 国际民商事条约在我国法院的可适用性及其适用模式[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报, 2022, 37(1): 105-116.
|
|
[7]
|
车丕照. 《民法典》颁行后国际条约与惯例在我国的适用[J]. 中国应用法学, 2020(6): 1-15.
|
|
[8]
|
刘瑛. 论《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》在中国法院的直接适用[J]. 法学评论, 2009, 27(5): 83-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
张普. CISG在我国法院的适用——兼论后民法典时代的条约适用问题[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(4): 100-108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[10]
|
联合国(1991) [EB/OL]. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/a-conf-97-19-ocred-eng.pdf, 2023-08-26.
|
|
[11]
|
胡晓红. CISG在中国适用的方法论思辨[J]. 商业研究, 2011(7): 21-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[12]
|
王杏飞. “指导性案例”法理透视[J]. 政治与法律, 2008(2): 69-75.
|